Recommended Posts

Would it not be nice to be able to write filenames in one's own handwriting? This feature was in development last decade when Windows Vista was codenamed "Longhorn." The recent emphasis on pen input from Microsoft with the introduction of Windows Ink has called to mind this Ink File Name feature that can benefit current Windows 10 users who interact with their devices using a pen.

The ability to write filenames (and perhaps certain metadata properties, more on this later) provides another way to add filenames without using a physical keyboard. Perhaps more importantly, it enables a richer level of personalization, where users—and content creators—who store or create files can view them just as they appear in their own handwriting.

LH3i.png

Microsoft showed this feature during the Professional Developers Conference of 2003 in the "Longhorn" shell:

Quote

I'm going to take this document right here -- and anyone who loves their Tablet will notice that we have ink file names right in the shell view.

Microsoft had also filed a patent in 2003 for functionality related to create and display handwritten information within an operating system interface:

Quote

Aspects of the present invention relate to systems and methods that allow users to receive, save, access, render, and/or display handwritten information in objects managed by an operating system and/or that are accessible by the operating system. For example, systems and methods according to at least some examples of the invention allow the operating system to receive, save, access, render, and/or display handwritten information (e.g., in the form of electronic ink) for use as file names (e.g., for files, documents, graphics, etc. saved on or accessible by the computer system); author identifiers; keywords or comments associated with a file, document, or object; and the like.

US07634729-20091215-D00000.png

The patent suggests that the handwritten information could also represent document metadata, for example, such as a document's author. A general illustration of what this could look like is shown above. I realize that not all of the functionality described in a patent may necessarily be implemented, but it does provide an overview of what an inking feature could provide. With that said, the ability to write filenames—an aspect of the invention described in the patent—was intended for Windows Vista.

Ink File Names.png

The company would later discuss the feature during Windows Hardware Engineering Conference of 2004 as part of its Tablet PC efforts. Note how the image suggests that one would be able to save files with their own handwriting.

There is no evidence to suggest that the addition of the Ink File Name feature would remove traditional input methods or even text-based file names, so there is no reason that it should not be available as an option. At first glance the feature might seem to be a small detail, but the small details add up to making a positive user experience (a statement I am sure that @LimeMaster agrees with). Thank you @LimeMaster for starting the suggestion at the Feedback Hub in Windows 10.

While the feature arguably should have been fully incorporated over a decade ago, you may be able to make it a part of Windows 10 if you leave feedback at the Feedback Hub.

  • Like 3
2 minutes ago, firey said:

Ugh, could you imagine using someone elses computer that has written all their folder names and trying to decipher what they wrote? 

Well there could be—actually I think there was in at least one pre-release "Longhorn" build—an option to show only text-based file names.

Just now, Ian W said:

Well there could be—actually I think there was in at least one pre-release "Longhorn" build—an option to show only text-based file names.

So you have to turn it on when you start using their PC.. then turn it off again before they call you up and ask why it's not working anymore.  Remote Support nightmare.

1 minute ago, firey said:

So you have to turn it on when you start using their PC.. then turn it off again before they call you up and ask why it's not working anymore.  Remote Support nightmare.

What if they would not appear during a remote session (i.e., only text-based file names are shown)? Your points are excellent points to consider, of course, but certainly there could be a way to make the feature practical for all users.

Just now, Ian W said:

What if they would not appear during a remote session (i.e., only text-based file names are shown)? Your points are excellent points to consider, of course, but certainly there could be a way to make the feature practical for all users.

What about anyone that brings their computer into a shop for repairs? Like don't get me wrong having that kind of interaction is nice... but at the same time when it comes to different screens, resolutions, ability.. having one set of clear font used is..well... nice.  

  • Like 2
Just now, firey said:

What about anyone that brings their computer into a shop for repairs? Like don't get me wrong having that kind of interaction is nice... but at the same time when it comes to different screens, resolutions, ability.. having one set of clear font used is..well... nice.  

I understand that but it should be an option that allows the users to have it turned on or off ..

 

Some people like to use handwriting.   Including the signatures. I don't mind handwritten notes, file names, etc. 

 

iOS 10 has handwritting feature in the messages app such as "Thank you" "Happy Birthday" etc.  Which you can see it here.

Just now, TAZMINATOR said:

I understand that but it should be an option that allows the users to have it turned on or off ..

 

Some people like to use handwriting.   Including the signatures. I don't mind handwritten notes, file names, etc. 

 

iOS 10 has handwritting feature in the messages app such as "Thank you" "Happy Birthday" etc.  Which you can see it here.

While it's all well and good when the text fills the screen.. try writing a meaningful filename that can be read by anyone in the space that a small font takes up.  It will be way too compressed or illegible.  Also text in files.. go ahead and write.. but for filenames on a desktop or in a directory... 

On 7/27/2016 at 6:59 PM, firey said:

What about anyone that brings their computer into a shop for repairs? Like don't get me wrong having that kind of interaction is nice... but at the same time when it comes to different screens, resolutions, ability.. having one set of clear font used is..well... nice.  

At the moment I am uncertain what could be done to address this issue, besides using the option that was previously mentioned, but as you suggested it could be inconvenient to switch the option on and then off.

Perhaps the handwriting feature could be disabled by default to limit its use?

Edit: Perhaps an interface element such as the details pane or status bar could always show the text-based file name, even if handwritten file names are displayed in the shell.

On 7/27/2016 at 7:06 PM, firey said:

While it's all well and good when the text fills the screen.. try writing a meaningful filename that can be read by anyone in the space that a small font takes up.  It will be way too compressed or illegible.  Also text in files.. go ahead and write.. but for filenames on a desktop or in a directory... 

For this, could one not scale the icons (and thus the handwriting)?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      453
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!