Recommended Posts

Xbox One and PS4 are getting a slight bump on current gen with the Xbox One S and PS4 Neo. More so with Neo. Consoles has always gone with this style of refresh. Why do gamers feel cheated out with this update than in Xbox 360S/E and PS3 slim?

 

 

1 hour ago, ACTIONpack said:

Xbox One and PS4 are getting a slight bump on current gen with the Xbox One S and PS4 Neo. More so with Neo. Consoles has always gone with this style of refresh. Why do gamers feel cheated out with this update than in Xbox 360S/E and PS3 slim?

 

 

Technically the One S isn't a bump, it's just like the 360 slim. Scorpio  will be the increase, but doesn't release til Holiday 2017. Neo we don't know when it's coming out, but if it's close to the Scorpio release, then it may as well just be called the next gen*. 

*I know it's not next gen and will play current gen games.

5 minutes ago, wakjak said:

Technically the One S isn't a bump, it's just like the 360 slim. Scorpio  will be the increase, but doesn't release til Holiday 2017. Neo we don't know when it's coming out, but if it's close to the Scorpio release, then it may as well just be called the next gen*. 

*I know it's not next gen and will play current gen games.

Technically it is a bump - http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-xbox-one-s-has-a-gpu-overclock-and-we-have-benchmarked-it

3 minutes ago, xendrome said:

I wouldn't necessarily call a tiny overclock much of a bump, still going to run the same games, just at better framerate finally. With Neo there will be games with noticeably better quality/framerate with Neo/Non-neo versions of games.

  • Like 1

The difference is older games on the newer console can perform better on the newer console.

When the Xbox360 was going through it's revisions, they had a faster cpu and had to lock / down clock the cpu to match the previous versions of the console to make the performance nearly identical. 

 

Console revisions are typically not popular. Some examples:

Xbox360 getting the HDMI connector after the fact.

The PS3 removing the PS2 hardware in later revisions.

Neither made older games magically run better.

 

Think of it this way, you buy the brand new 2015 Brand X car as soon as it hits the lots.

3 months later, the same base model gets some cool upgrades. You would feel a bit of burn.

 

Sony and Microsoft are headed into uncharted territory with dramatic hardware upgrades for the "same" generation console.

They have to find a balance between time of hardware refreshes and cost of the console. 

 

A lot of people still see a gaming console a "console", not a computer.

Part of the reason the backlash about Microsoft original plan to use steam software model. 

 

Edited by Eternal Tempest
2 hours ago, ACTIONpack said:

Xbox One and PS4 are getting a slight bump on current gen with the Xbox One S and PS4 Neo. More so with Neo. Consoles has always gone with this style of refresh. Why do gamers feel cheated out with this update than in Xbox 360S/E and PS3 slim?

 

 

Because this is the first time ever, AFAIK, that a refresh is faster than the original. Even though the performance increase is quite small, some people are obviously not going to be happy with the fact that their original X1 is slower.

 

P.S. It seems you're confusing X1 S with the upcoming Scorpio, which is going to compete with Neo.

 

40 minutes ago, Eternal Tempest said:

When the Xbox360 was going through it's revisions, they had a faster cpu and had to lock / down clock the cpu to match the previous versions of the console to make the performance nearly identical. 

All x360 revisions had the EXACT same CPU and GPU blocks in their chips, with exactly the same specs and clock speeds. There was no down-clocking.

 

The main issue came up when they went with a single chip design for the X360 S, instead of the usual two chip design for the preceding 360s. That move unintentionally caused the latency between CPU and GPU to drop, because now they were on the same chip and next to each other, instead of being in different chips on different parts of the motherboard. This would have increased the performance by a very small amount.

 

To counter this and to keep the performance the same, they artificially increased the latency on the new chip on purpose. That was the only difference between 1 chip and 2 chip x360s. Performance remained exactly the same.

 

EDIT: I found the article. The "FSB Replacement" block, which didn't exist on older 360s, adds that artificial latency. All the other blocks are the same as the old ones.

 

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2010/08/microsoft-beats-intel-amd-to-market-with-cpugpu-combo-chip/

Edited by eddman
  • Like 1

It's a non topic, a 3 FPS increase isn't worth noticing or talking about compared to past upgrades. Way bigger slaps in the mouth where the PS3 with PS2 hardware removal and 360 missing HDMI on first release as posted above.

  • Like 2
5 hours ago, ACTIONpack said:

Xbox One and PS4 are getting a slight bump on current gen with the Xbox One S and PS4 Neo. More so with Neo. Consoles has always gone with this style of refresh. Why do gamers feel cheated out with this update than in Xbox 360S/E and PS3 slim?

 

 

Because people feel cheated everytime something new comes along that is better (even if its only marginally so) than their current device.

 

The Xbox One came out November 2013, almost 3 years ago. Now we have a new xbox that is only marginally better, with a more powerful one coming next year so a 4 year refresh cycle. It'll still play the same games, run the same apps, but nooo gamers got to complain about absolutely everything.

 

I remember when the xbox one S was announced at E3 there were a bunch of people on this forum (and others) complaining that they just bought a new xbox and now MS announces a new one. Who's fault is that? It's been known for months and months that MS and Sony were going to announce new consoles at E3...why wouldn't you wait?

 

I seriously don't know why people want a 7 year refresh cycle between consoles. The amount of technological improvements that happen between year 1 and year 7 is significant. I mean think of how games changed between 2005 (release date of Xbox 360 and PS3) and 2013 (release date of Xbox one and ps4), especially in the graphics arena. In 2005 1080P TVs were just starting to come out. We're now on 4K and none of the current consoles (Xbox One, Xbox One S, PS4) can handle 4K gaming at all, and hell at times they struggle with 1080 content as well. Its very likely that by 2020 we'll have a new standard that is better than 4K. 

 

When its all said and done, gamers are the biggest bunch of whiners and complainers ever. Doesn't matter what Microsoft, Sony, EA, Activision, Blizzard, etc etc etc do, there will be a huge chunk of them that have nothing better to do than complain about how company X is destroying everything and gaming is ruined and the world is going to come to an end. (and yes I am well aware of the irony of me complaining about gamers complaining hahaha). 

Edited by -Razorfold
On 8/7/2016 at 1:27 AM, -Razorfold said:

Because people feel cheated everytime something new comes along that is better (even if its only marginally so) than their current device.

 

The Xbox One came out November 2013, almost 3 years ago. Now we have a new xbox that is only marginally better, with a more powerful one coming next year so a 4 year refresh cycle. It'll still play the same games, run the same apps, but nooo gamers got to complain about absolutely everything.

 

I remember when the xbox one S was announced at E3 there were a bunch of people on this forum (and others) complaining that they just bought a new xbox and now MS announces a new one. Who's fault is that? It's been known for months and months that MS and Sony were going to announce new consoles at E3...why wouldn't you wait?

 

I seriously don't know why people want a 7 year refresh cycle between consoles. The amount of technological improvements that happen between year 1 and year 7 is significant. I mean think of how games changed between 2005 (release date of Xbox 360 and PS3) and 2013 (release date of Xbox one and ps4), especially in the graphics arena. In 2005 1080P TVs were just starting to come out. We're now on 4K and none of the current consoles (Xbox One, Xbox One S, PS4) can handle 4K gaming at all, and hell at times they struggle with 1080 content as well. Its very likely that by 2020 we'll have a new standard that is better than 4K. 

 

When its all said and done, gamers are the biggest bunch of whiners and complainers ever. Doesn't matter what Microsoft, Sony, EA, Activision, Blizzard, etc etc etc do, there will be a huge chunk of them that have nothing better to do than complain about how company X is destroying everything and gaming is ruined and the world is going to come to an end. (and yes I am well aware of the irony of me complaining about gamers complaining hahaha). 

You forgot Ubisoft/Warner Brothers... as the both of them do actually ruin gaming :p 

On 07/08/2016 at 1:27 AM, -Razorfold said:

I remember when the xbox one S was announced at E3 there were a bunch of people on this forum (and others) complaining that they just bought a new xbox and now MS announces a new one. Who's fault is that? It's been known for months and months that MS and Sony were going to announce new consoles at E3...why wouldn't you wait?

It wasn't known, it was rumoured. Only as we reached June did leaks hit the internet with info about MS' E3 presentation did we know some detail. Prior to that, Phil Spencer had denied the claims in the months before.

 

Sony too did not comment on Neo's existance until the Friday before E3, and only then it was to tell gamers not to expect any news / announcement of it at E3.

On 8/6/2016 at 2:48 PM, ACTIONpack said:

Consoles has always gone with this style of refresh. Why do gamers feel cheated out with this update than in Xbox 360S/E and PS3 slim?

I like how you say that gamers are clueless but you don't know what you are talking about.

 

On 8/6/2016 at 8:27 PM, -Razorfold said:

When its all said and done, gamers are the biggest bunch of whiners and complainers ever.

The gaming demographic will always be made up of a large amount of youth; teenagers and 20-somethings. Many teenagers and 20-somethings are filled with criticism and quick judgement and are very vocal about it on various online forums. There are many gamers with more respectable opinions that aren't as vocal about their opinions, they are simply enjoying their preferred titles.

 

 

Some of you guys should look to improve your cognitive and writing skills. Too much analysis of popular opinion followed by thinking those popular opinions represent everyone involved with the topic.

It is simply not the case.

  • Like 2
16 minutes ago, madd-hatter said:

I like how you say that gamers are clueless but you don't know what you are talking about.

 

What am I clueless about? Why the blanket statement without any backing?

24 minutes ago, ACTIONpack said:

What am I clueless about? Why the blanket statement without any backing?

The area of your original statement that I quoted and the other responses within this thread should make it apparent.

Just now, Circaflex said:

That's ironic, your thread title has a blanket statement in it.

 

My statement was addressing the internet all these gamers that are up in arms about this version of Xbox. The Xbox 360 Slim didn't get this backlash.

For what it's worth, I'm paying this "update" the exact same amount of interest as I treated the slim models. If my console breaks and I need a replacement, I'll look in to the Neo. Otherwise, I don't see the point, I'm happy with things as they are at the moment.

40 minutes ago, ACTIONpack said:

My statement was addressing the internet all these gamers that are up in arms about this version of Xbox. The Xbox 360 Slim didn't get this backlash.

Nobody feels cheated about the X1S.

 

All of the people you are referring to as "clueless" are discussing the Xbox One 'Scorpio' and PS4 Neo. They are not "slim" versions of the console; they are major upgrades to the current hardware.

  • Like 2

As a PC gamer, I find it absolutely absurd that an Xbox One doesn't play Xbox and Xbox 360 games, and that a PlayStation 4 doesn't play PS1, PS2, and PS3 games. I understand why they don't; my issue is with the fact that profit is a large factor. I bought a PS3 instead of a PS4 because it has a bigger library (and I got a great deal). Of course, I've been saying this since the Super NES came out.

 

I agree that the Xbox One S is the same, more or less, as the Xbox 360 S. It's just a smaller version. Oh, and it does 4K too, but if you can afford a 4K TV, you won't get any sympathy from me about "having to" buy a new Xbox One three years after the last one. I know it's a fallacy, but it's once I choose to cling to. When you buy a console, you buy the unit for what it can do at the time. There's no contract, real or imagined, that the company won't make a better one in three years. Hell, it's no better for PC gamers. I spent ~$300 on a graphics card, only to be told six months later it was on the "not good enough" side for Steam VR. Oops? Nah, not really. It happens. And I don't really care about VR, I'm just unhappy that, to get VR, in addition to what I already paid, I would have to pay even more for better parts.

  • 2 weeks later...
On 17/08/2016 at 4:56 AM, The Evil Overlord said:

ohh, the fun we could have if we could build a console the way we could build a pc.......

Why would you want to lower yourself to that kind of level. PC would still be better.

  • Like 1
On ‎8‎/‎6‎/‎2016 at 3:19 PM, wakjak said:

I wouldn't necessarily call a tiny overclock much of a bump, still going to run the same games, just at better framerate finally. With Neo there will be games with noticeably better quality/framerate with Neo/Non-neo versions of games.

The overall experience is noticeably better. The UI, streaming from USB, DLNA, many apps not just games. I'm with you though, it's not a major performance bump, and the level of performance improvement the S provides should have been there from the get go.

 

However, getting 4K and HDR and getting the Power Supply internal is a worthy mid-life update, especially with the $150 trade-in that went on for a month and the pretty reasonable cost for new users. XBox One, w 4K/HDR streaming and UHD Bluray for $299 ...

 

As for Scorpio, let's face it, it's going to be a few more years before a console can truly straight up play any games other than Othello at 4k resolution. Most PCs cannot, not without high-end SLI and a high end processor. If it does, it's going to cost close to $1000, the GPU alone will need to have $600 GPU capability. I haven't followed what Sony is promising with Neo, but I will most likely always go with Xbox One for Xlive and the controller. The PlayStation controller to me is the worst thing ever for American hands. But some seem to love it. That's why choice is good.

11 minutes ago, Crisp said:

Why would you want to lower yourself to that kind of level. PC would still be better.

PC is better, but still a bull in a china shop in the living room. That's why Xbox Play Anywhere appeals to me. I can get all the high-end graphics when I play solo on the PC, and have the game on the console when outside of the cave. Having X1 peripherals become ubiquitous on the PC is also a great idea.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!