Recommended Posts

Well this is a weird one.

 

Ran the downloaded W10 Anniversary files from MS -- it upchucked after nearly completing.

 

Ran this from the hard drive files -- not an .iso disc burn.

 

[Yes, I probably should have.]

 

Got a bluescreen reading that Windows encountered a problem, needs to Restart.

 

After I restarted, it read to insert a bootable media.

 

I put in the W10 dvd, and tried all the repairs, Reset, etc.

 

Once again, it said C: drive was locked.

 

Another screen message read that Windows/System32/boot/winload.exe was missing or has errors.

 

Here comes the curve:  I somehow got Windows C: drive to boot up !

 

I looked at the 'missing' boot file, and it IS there.

 

I ran the Error check, that supposedly finds file errors.

 

None were found.

 

 

I'm afraid to turn OFF the computer until I'm fairly certain that all is well.

 

Should I do the Command Prompt chkdsk /f -- or what do you guys suggest ?

 

I may have left out some detail, I'm a bit upset.

 

Many thanks for your suggestions !

 

  • zhangm changed the title to A little help please with W10 Anniversary Install and Bad Boot file

Is this a winload.exe digital signature problem (0xc0000428)? I had this yesterday, and what a pain in the ass. I hadn't booted this computer in 3 months, and I'm on the fast preview builds. I had to reset my BIOS/UEFI date so that the PC could boot. This might help

I didnt get the same error, but I did get 0xc000000d (kept coming up with  a recovery message), a few days ago

 

I found out that this is related to TPM 1.2 / bitlocker. It's MS's way of telling you to update to TPM 2.

 

After I disabled TPM / removed the TPM 1.2 module, the error disappeared

 

Wouldnt be surprised if your prob is similar, because you cant boot into windows, if you get the 0xc000000d error either.

 

Altho if I pressed reset a few times, Windows did load

 

 

 

 

14 minutes ago, Hum said:

OK, got my needed personal files backed up.

 

Guess I will try the long chkdsk ....

 

This volume will be checked the next time the system restarts.

is this the same hdd as last weeks issues buddy?

Thanks for your post John.

 

I guess I solved my own problem.

 

I ran chkdsk from Windows, and again from the Command window/reboot/DOS.

 

One or the other seems to have cleared up the problem.

 

I apparently now have the updated Anniversary edition.

 

I noticed some graphics changes.

 

Thanks again to those who helped.

 

Case Closed [fingers crossed] :s

49 minutes ago, John.D said:

I found out that this is related to TPM 1.2 / bitlocker. It's MS's way of telling you to update to TPM 2.

After I disabled TPM / removed the TPM 1.2 module, the error disappeared

 

I think you are right John.

 

What is TPM and where is it ?

 

I found this:

 

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/keep-secure/tpm-recommendations

34 minutes ago, Eric said:

A TPM (Trusted Platform Module) is a chip on the motherboard. There should be an option in the BIOS or EFI settings to turn it on and off.

I could not find TPM in the BIOS.

I found this on TPM:

 

Dell TPM 2.0 Update Utility

 

I downloaded and ran File Name:DellTpm2.0_Fw1.3.0.1_V2.exe

 

http://www.dell.com/support/home/bb/en/bbbsdt1/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=95C8J

 

After running it from within Windows, I restarted and did not get a problem message.

 

I am not really sure if the program did anything.

 

It only took a split second and no message came up.

 

I did not see anything about running it from a USB drive, DOS.

 

I did not see the TPM info under the BIOS area.

 

 

If any of you want to try changing your TPM firmware, read over the Dell page carefully.

 

 

 

 

 

Well apparently this Dell TPM 2.0 Update Utility is the solution. :yes:

 

Thank you John, and thanks to Dell.

 

I waited a while to see if any more problems popped up with the Boot.

 

Hard to believe the TPM could be updated in a split second.

 

But I wont argue with results.

The TPM thing would only apply if there is a TPM module / chip on the system. Obviously nothing will happen if it doesnt exist

 

If that TPM 2 file fixed it then the chip must support it or that file must update it or something

 

Cant say that I've heard of TPM chips being updateable with a file tho

 

 

 

13 minutes ago, Hum said:

According to Dell, the TPM can be flashed.

 

But I don't think it did anything.

 

I can't do a full AVG scan without it crashing the PC.

Unless using bitlocker, tpm has no bearing on that. 

2 hours ago, Eric said:

A TPM is required for Secure Boot, too.

Would you know where in the BIOS TPM would be listed ?  I couldn't find it. [AMD motherboard]

 

This is something interesting ... After the W10 Anv. Update, I got around to running a Registry scan.

 

Dozens of invalid entries were found and deleted.

 

We'll see if things run smoothly now.

 

If not, I have a burned DVD with the Update on it, ready to go.

 

I will wipe the hard drive and try a clean Install.

9 minutes ago, Hum said:

Would you know where in the BIOS TPM would be listed ?  I couldn't find it. [AMD motherboard]

 

This is something interesting ... After the W10 Anv. Update, I got around to running a Registry scan.

 

Dozens of invalid entries were found and deleted.

 

We'll see if things run smoothly now.

 

If not, I have a burned DVD with the Update on it, ready to go.

 

I will wipe the hard drive and try a clean Install.

Just a word of advice, those registry scanners often do more harm than good, especially if you just hit scan and delete, without really understand what it is you are deleting/removing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Digisecret 2.1.431 Pro and Wzipse 4.0. Both are encrypted self-extracting archives.
    • Google reshuffles its AI coding team as it struggles to catch Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is already reorganizing the AI coding “strike team” it created roughly two months ago, as it attempts to find ways to close the gap with Anthropic in one of generative AI’s most commercially important areas. According to The Information, Google DeepMind is expanding the team’s focus to include “midtraining,” rather than concentrating only on coding tools and agents. Midtraining takes place after a model’s broad initial training but before the final stages that prepare it to follow instructions and perform specific tasks. In simple terms, it gives developers another opportunity to expose a model to carefully selected data before it is polished for release. That could help Google improve Gemini’s underlying coding abilities instead of relying only on better prompts, interfaces, or post-training. Previous research has found that midtraining can be particularly effective for code and mathematics, where models must move from general language knowledge to more structured tasks. Google reportedly created the original strike team in April. It was led by Google DeepMind research engineer Sebastian Borgeaud, who previously worked on model pretraining, and focused on complex, long-running programming jobs. Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Google DeepMind chief technology officer Koray Kavukcuoglu were also reportedly involved in the effort. DeepMind researchers were said to believe that Anthropic’s coding tools were outperforming Google’s Gemini models, prompting the company to give the project more attention. Anthropic has made coding a central part of its AI strategy through Claude Code and its Claude model family. The company has continued improving that area, with Claude Opus 4.8 offering upgrades for coding and other agentic tasks, along with the now-unavailable Mythos and Fable models. The reshuffle also comes at a time when Google faces increased competition for AI researchers. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer recently announced that he was leaving Google for OpenAI, while two other researchers who contributed to Gemini and DeepMind projects are reportedly preparing to join Anthropic. It remains unclear whether the reorganized team will produce a new public Gemini model or developer product. No release date, team size, or specific performance target has been disclosed. Source: The Information
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      413
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!