Recommended Posts

Well this is a weird one.

 

Ran the downloaded W10 Anniversary files from MS -- it upchucked after nearly completing.

 

Ran this from the hard drive files -- not an .iso disc burn.

 

[Yes, I probably should have.]

 

Got a bluescreen reading that Windows encountered a problem, needs to Restart.

 

After I restarted, it read to insert a bootable media.

 

I put in the W10 dvd, and tried all the repairs, Reset, etc.

 

Once again, it said C: drive was locked.

 

Another screen message read that Windows/System32/boot/winload.exe was missing or has errors.

 

Here comes the curve:  I somehow got Windows C: drive to boot up !

 

I looked at the 'missing' boot file, and it IS there.

 

I ran the Error check, that supposedly finds file errors.

 

None were found.

 

 

I'm afraid to turn OFF the computer until I'm fairly certain that all is well.

 

Should I do the Command Prompt chkdsk /f -- or what do you guys suggest ?

 

I may have left out some detail, I'm a bit upset.

 

Many thanks for your suggestions !

 

  • zhangm changed the title to A little help please with W10 Anniversary Install and Bad Boot file

Is this a winload.exe digital signature problem (0xc0000428)? I had this yesterday, and what a pain in the ass. I hadn't booted this computer in 3 months, and I'm on the fast preview builds. I had to reset my BIOS/UEFI date so that the PC could boot. This might help

I didnt get the same error, but I did get 0xc000000d (kept coming up with  a recovery message), a few days ago

 

I found out that this is related to TPM 1.2 / bitlocker. It's MS's way of telling you to update to TPM 2.

 

After I disabled TPM / removed the TPM 1.2 module, the error disappeared

 

Wouldnt be surprised if your prob is similar, because you cant boot into windows, if you get the 0xc000000d error either.

 

Altho if I pressed reset a few times, Windows did load

 

 

 

 

14 minutes ago, Hum said:

OK, got my needed personal files backed up.

 

Guess I will try the long chkdsk ....

 

This volume will be checked the next time the system restarts.

is this the same hdd as last weeks issues buddy?

Thanks for your post John.

 

I guess I solved my own problem.

 

I ran chkdsk from Windows, and again from the Command window/reboot/DOS.

 

One or the other seems to have cleared up the problem.

 

I apparently now have the updated Anniversary edition.

 

I noticed some graphics changes.

 

Thanks again to those who helped.

 

Case Closed [fingers crossed] :s

49 minutes ago, John.D said:

I found out that this is related to TPM 1.2 / bitlocker. It's MS's way of telling you to update to TPM 2.

After I disabled TPM / removed the TPM 1.2 module, the error disappeared

 

I think you are right John.

 

What is TPM and where is it ?

 

I found this:

 

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/keep-secure/tpm-recommendations

34 minutes ago, Eric said:

A TPM (Trusted Platform Module) is a chip on the motherboard. There should be an option in the BIOS or EFI settings to turn it on and off.

I could not find TPM in the BIOS.

I found this on TPM:

 

Dell TPM 2.0 Update Utility

 

I downloaded and ran File Name:DellTpm2.0_Fw1.3.0.1_V2.exe

 

http://www.dell.com/support/home/bb/en/bbbsdt1/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=95C8J

 

After running it from within Windows, I restarted and did not get a problem message.

 

I am not really sure if the program did anything.

 

It only took a split second and no message came up.

 

I did not see anything about running it from a USB drive, DOS.

 

I did not see the TPM info under the BIOS area.

 

 

If any of you want to try changing your TPM firmware, read over the Dell page carefully.

 

 

 

 

 

Well apparently this Dell TPM 2.0 Update Utility is the solution. :yes:

 

Thank you John, and thanks to Dell.

 

I waited a while to see if any more problems popped up with the Boot.

 

Hard to believe the TPM could be updated in a split second.

 

But I wont argue with results.

The TPM thing would only apply if there is a TPM module / chip on the system. Obviously nothing will happen if it doesnt exist

 

If that TPM 2 file fixed it then the chip must support it or that file must update it or something

 

Cant say that I've heard of TPM chips being updateable with a file tho

 

 

 

13 minutes ago, Hum said:

According to Dell, the TPM can be flashed.

 

But I don't think it did anything.

 

I can't do a full AVG scan without it crashing the PC.

Unless using bitlocker, tpm has no bearing on that. 

2 hours ago, Eric said:

A TPM is required for Secure Boot, too.

Would you know where in the BIOS TPM would be listed ?  I couldn't find it. [AMD motherboard]

 

This is something interesting ... After the W10 Anv. Update, I got around to running a Registry scan.

 

Dozens of invalid entries were found and deleted.

 

We'll see if things run smoothly now.

 

If not, I have a burned DVD with the Update on it, ready to go.

 

I will wipe the hard drive and try a clean Install.

9 minutes ago, Hum said:

Would you know where in the BIOS TPM would be listed ?  I couldn't find it. [AMD motherboard]

 

This is something interesting ... After the W10 Anv. Update, I got around to running a Registry scan.

 

Dozens of invalid entries were found and deleted.

 

We'll see if things run smoothly now.

 

If not, I have a burned DVD with the Update on it, ready to go.

 

I will wipe the hard drive and try a clean Install.

Just a word of advice, those registry scanners often do more harm than good, especially if you just hit scan and delete, without really understand what it is you are deleting/removing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!