Recommended Posts

Well this is a weird one.

 

Ran the downloaded W10 Anniversary files from MS -- it upchucked after nearly completing.

 

Ran this from the hard drive files -- not an .iso disc burn.

 

[Yes, I probably should have.]

 

Got a bluescreen reading that Windows encountered a problem, needs to Restart.

 

After I restarted, it read to insert a bootable media.

 

I put in the W10 dvd, and tried all the repairs, Reset, etc.

 

Once again, it said C: drive was locked.

 

Another screen message read that Windows/System32/boot/winload.exe was missing or has errors.

 

Here comes the curve:  I somehow got Windows C: drive to boot up !

 

I looked at the 'missing' boot file, and it IS there.

 

I ran the Error check, that supposedly finds file errors.

 

None were found.

 

 

I'm afraid to turn OFF the computer until I'm fairly certain that all is well.

 

Should I do the Command Prompt chkdsk /f -- or what do you guys suggest ?

 

I may have left out some detail, I'm a bit upset.

 

Many thanks for your suggestions !

 

  • zhangm changed the title to A little help please with W10 Anniversary Install and Bad Boot file

Is this a winload.exe digital signature problem (0xc0000428)? I had this yesterday, and what a pain in the ass. I hadn't booted this computer in 3 months, and I'm on the fast preview builds. I had to reset my BIOS/UEFI date so that the PC could boot. This might help

I didnt get the same error, but I did get 0xc000000d (kept coming up with  a recovery message), a few days ago

 

I found out that this is related to TPM 1.2 / bitlocker. It's MS's way of telling you to update to TPM 2.

 

After I disabled TPM / removed the TPM 1.2 module, the error disappeared

 

Wouldnt be surprised if your prob is similar, because you cant boot into windows, if you get the 0xc000000d error either.

 

Altho if I pressed reset a few times, Windows did load

 

 

 

 

14 minutes ago, Hum said:

OK, got my needed personal files backed up.

 

Guess I will try the long chkdsk ....

 

This volume will be checked the next time the system restarts.

is this the same hdd as last weeks issues buddy?

Thanks for your post John.

 

I guess I solved my own problem.

 

I ran chkdsk from Windows, and again from the Command window/reboot/DOS.

 

One or the other seems to have cleared up the problem.

 

I apparently now have the updated Anniversary edition.

 

I noticed some graphics changes.

 

Thanks again to those who helped.

 

Case Closed [fingers crossed] :s

49 minutes ago, John.D said:

I found out that this is related to TPM 1.2 / bitlocker. It's MS's way of telling you to update to TPM 2.

After I disabled TPM / removed the TPM 1.2 module, the error disappeared

 

I think you are right John.

 

What is TPM and where is it ?

 

I found this:

 

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/keep-secure/tpm-recommendations

34 minutes ago, Eric said:

A TPM (Trusted Platform Module) is a chip on the motherboard. There should be an option in the BIOS or EFI settings to turn it on and off.

I could not find TPM in the BIOS.

I found this on TPM:

 

Dell TPM 2.0 Update Utility

 

I downloaded and ran File Name:DellTpm2.0_Fw1.3.0.1_V2.exe

 

http://www.dell.com/support/home/bb/en/bbbsdt1/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=95C8J

 

After running it from within Windows, I restarted and did not get a problem message.

 

I am not really sure if the program did anything.

 

It only took a split second and no message came up.

 

I did not see anything about running it from a USB drive, DOS.

 

I did not see the TPM info under the BIOS area.

 

 

If any of you want to try changing your TPM firmware, read over the Dell page carefully.

 

 

 

 

 

Well apparently this Dell TPM 2.0 Update Utility is the solution. :yes:

 

Thank you John, and thanks to Dell.

 

I waited a while to see if any more problems popped up with the Boot.

 

Hard to believe the TPM could be updated in a split second.

 

But I wont argue with results.

The TPM thing would only apply if there is a TPM module / chip on the system. Obviously nothing will happen if it doesnt exist

 

If that TPM 2 file fixed it then the chip must support it or that file must update it or something

 

Cant say that I've heard of TPM chips being updateable with a file tho

 

 

 

13 minutes ago, Hum said:

According to Dell, the TPM can be flashed.

 

But I don't think it did anything.

 

I can't do a full AVG scan without it crashing the PC.

Unless using bitlocker, tpm has no bearing on that. 

2 hours ago, Eric said:

A TPM is required for Secure Boot, too.

Would you know where in the BIOS TPM would be listed ?  I couldn't find it. [AMD motherboard]

 

This is something interesting ... After the W10 Anv. Update, I got around to running a Registry scan.

 

Dozens of invalid entries were found and deleted.

 

We'll see if things run smoothly now.

 

If not, I have a burned DVD with the Update on it, ready to go.

 

I will wipe the hard drive and try a clean Install.

9 minutes ago, Hum said:

Would you know where in the BIOS TPM would be listed ?  I couldn't find it. [AMD motherboard]

 

This is something interesting ... After the W10 Anv. Update, I got around to running a Registry scan.

 

Dozens of invalid entries were found and deleted.

 

We'll see if things run smoothly now.

 

If not, I have a burned DVD with the Update on it, ready to go.

 

I will wipe the hard drive and try a clean Install.

Just a word of advice, those registry scanners often do more harm than good, especially if you just hit scan and delete, without really understand what it is you are deleting/removing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      119
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!