Is putting everything in one huge 25GB file a bad idea?


Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Danielx64 said:

The latest Deus Ex has like one massive archive file and several smaller ones. I cant decide if it a bad idea or a good one. I guess that with that huge file you would everything in one block on the harddrive so that performance would be good but IDK.

It depends.  As I understand it, it's good for the applications internal memory management.

 

Lots of first person games use large files such, though perhaps not that large.

45 minutes ago, LostCat said:

It depends.  As I understand it, it's good for the applications internal memory management.

 

Lots of first person games use large files such, though perhaps not that large.

Looks like I need to find a way of getting that large file in one block on the harddrive. Mind you, The Division is quite large but use lots of small files.....

Seems like it would help performance generally and I guess it would help with reducing the game's disk space footprint? Honestly though, being one that likes to poke around in game assets and tweak stuff, I rather preferred when games had looser structures to their data. Unreal engine titles prior to version 3 were great like this, and Quake 3/Doom 3 pk3/4 files were just zips that you could open and modify at will. That was awesome.

 

While I'm sure there's some performance upsides to keeping game data in one big file, I'd imagine the big driver towards the one-big-impenetrable-file structure is to prevent tampering, especially in this age of Denuvo and built-in DLC.

 

I did notice that Mankind Divided takes a hell of a long time to load, but the maps are huge and transitioning around them seems totally seamless.

1 minute ago, Circaflex said:

What exactly do you mean?

Like defragging the entire harddrive but just that one file :)

2 minutes ago, IanHead said:

I did notice that Mankind Divided takes a hell of a long time to load, but the maps are huge and transitioning around them seems totally seamless.

I'm having serious issues with one area on the map where I would only get like 1 frame per second :( Never done that till now.

2 hours ago, Danielx64 said:

Looks like I need to find a way of getting that large file in one block on the harddrive. Mind you, The Division is quite large but use lots of small files.....

I'm just sayin you can go all the way back to FEAR 1 and perhaps before that to find insanely large files in FPS land.

13 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I'm just sayin you can go all the way back to FEAR 1 and perhaps before that to find insanely large files in FPS land.

Yeah, FEAR has those .Arch## files, though iirc it is split up into smaller chunks rather than one enormous one.

1 hour ago, Danielx64 said:

Like defragging the entire harddrive but just that one file :)

use Mark Russinovich's Contig or use Piriform Defraggler which also have similar capability (via its search feature).

Edited by Torolol

So you have bad performance in one particular area of a map in a particular game... You think it has to do with the area that file is located? Then wouldn't that imply hardware, not some file system anomaly? Just trying to follow the logic here... Instead of defragging, perhaps  a checkdisk is in order. Or it's just a bug.

On 2016-08-29 at 8:07 PM, Danielx64 said:

The latest Deus Ex has like one massive archive file and several smaller ones. I cant decide if it a bad idea or a good one. I guess that with that huge file you would everything in one block on the harddrive so that performance would be good but IDK.

For backup it's not cool. Every time the game is updated you have to redo the whole 25GB backup. If the backup is done online or using an external disk on an old computer supporting USB2 only that's not cool.

 

Also if the file gets corrupted you have to redownload the whole thing (if you don't have a backup).

15 minutes ago, LaP said:

For backup it's not cool. Every time the game is updated you have to redo the whole 25GB backup. If the backup is done online or using an external disk on an old computer supporting USB2 only that's not cool.

 

Also if the file gets corrupted you have to redownload the whole thing (if you don't have a backup).

If you're still using USB2 or flaky drives but playing high end games like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided...that is weird.

3 hours ago, LostCat said:

If you're still using USB2 or flaky drives but playing high end games like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided...that is weird.

Why?

 

My PC can still run new games. I wont upgrade it just to get USB3 support ;)

 

Not my fault if cpus did not progress much in the last 10 years. My overclocked core i5 750 is still doing the job at 1080p while paired with a 970. It is starting to show its age lately but it's still good enough.

It's not the packaging but the usage that's important. Guild Wars 2 is one 27GB asset file but has no loading issues. On the other hand, SWTOR takes minutes just to load the tiny interior of your personal starship.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Still hate Windows 11, I stuck it on my gaming machine again just for a nose to see what they had done, still as bad. Will restore Windows 10 back on it, suit MS anyway, they don't want me to run Windows 11 on it.
    • Ms did go with the you must sign into an account thing with Windows 8 for a while. The same sort of thing they are doing with Windows now and the MS account.
    • Hello, What sort of Microsoft Authenticator account login approval requests are you getting?  It is a generic authentication app and can be used with all sorts of services (Microsoft Account, Google Account, websites and services that support multi-factor authentication, etc.). Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Windows 8? Nah. I found Window 8 worked well, get a third party start menu to get rid of the start screen, I used Start is back and windows 8 was pretty good. I used it even when Windows 10 came out as I found Windows 10 was iffy on my machine at the time was AMD FX Bulldozer based. It was only when I updated the innards to Ryzen that I had no choice but to go to Windows 10 as MS made it difficult to stay with Windows 8. ME, yes, that was not great, I liked the look of it, but it was not stable, shame really because Windows 98SE was the best of the dos based Windows.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!