Is putting everything in one huge 25GB file a bad idea?


Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Danielx64 said:

The latest Deus Ex has like one massive archive file and several smaller ones. I cant decide if it a bad idea or a good one. I guess that with that huge file you would everything in one block on the harddrive so that performance would be good but IDK.

It depends.  As I understand it, it's good for the applications internal memory management.

 

Lots of first person games use large files such, though perhaps not that large.

45 minutes ago, LostCat said:

It depends.  As I understand it, it's good for the applications internal memory management.

 

Lots of first person games use large files such, though perhaps not that large.

Looks like I need to find a way of getting that large file in one block on the harddrive. Mind you, The Division is quite large but use lots of small files.....

Seems like it would help performance generally and I guess it would help with reducing the game's disk space footprint? Honestly though, being one that likes to poke around in game assets and tweak stuff, I rather preferred when games had looser structures to their data. Unreal engine titles prior to version 3 were great like this, and Quake 3/Doom 3 pk3/4 files were just zips that you could open and modify at will. That was awesome.

 

While I'm sure there's some performance upsides to keeping game data in one big file, I'd imagine the big driver towards the one-big-impenetrable-file structure is to prevent tampering, especially in this age of Denuvo and built-in DLC.

 

I did notice that Mankind Divided takes a hell of a long time to load, but the maps are huge and transitioning around them seems totally seamless.

1 minute ago, Circaflex said:

What exactly do you mean?

Like defragging the entire harddrive but just that one file :)

2 minutes ago, IanHead said:

I did notice that Mankind Divided takes a hell of a long time to load, but the maps are huge and transitioning around them seems totally seamless.

I'm having serious issues with one area on the map where I would only get like 1 frame per second :( Never done that till now.

2 hours ago, Danielx64 said:

Looks like I need to find a way of getting that large file in one block on the harddrive. Mind you, The Division is quite large but use lots of small files.....

I'm just sayin you can go all the way back to FEAR 1 and perhaps before that to find insanely large files in FPS land.

13 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I'm just sayin you can go all the way back to FEAR 1 and perhaps before that to find insanely large files in FPS land.

Yeah, FEAR has those .Arch## files, though iirc it is split up into smaller chunks rather than one enormous one.

1 hour ago, Danielx64 said:

Like defragging the entire harddrive but just that one file :)

use Mark Russinovich's Contig or use Piriform Defraggler which also have similar capability (via its search feature).

Edited by Torolol

So you have bad performance in one particular area of a map in a particular game... You think it has to do with the area that file is located? Then wouldn't that imply hardware, not some file system anomaly? Just trying to follow the logic here... Instead of defragging, perhaps  a checkdisk is in order. Or it's just a bug.

On 2016-08-29 at 8:07 PM, Danielx64 said:

The latest Deus Ex has like one massive archive file and several smaller ones. I cant decide if it a bad idea or a good one. I guess that with that huge file you would everything in one block on the harddrive so that performance would be good but IDK.

For backup it's not cool. Every time the game is updated you have to redo the whole 25GB backup. If the backup is done online or using an external disk on an old computer supporting USB2 only that's not cool.

 

Also if the file gets corrupted you have to redownload the whole thing (if you don't have a backup).

15 minutes ago, LaP said:

For backup it's not cool. Every time the game is updated you have to redo the whole 25GB backup. If the backup is done online or using an external disk on an old computer supporting USB2 only that's not cool.

 

Also if the file gets corrupted you have to redownload the whole thing (if you don't have a backup).

If you're still using USB2 or flaky drives but playing high end games like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided...that is weird.

3 hours ago, LostCat said:

If you're still using USB2 or flaky drives but playing high end games like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided...that is weird.

Why?

 

My PC can still run new games. I wont upgrade it just to get USB3 support ;)

 

Not my fault if cpus did not progress much in the last 10 years. My overclocked core i5 750 is still doing the job at 1080p while paired with a 970. It is starting to show its age lately but it's still good enough.

It's not the packaging but the usage that's important. Guild Wars 2 is one 27GB asset file but has no loading issues. On the other hand, SWTOR takes minutes just to load the tiny interior of your personal starship.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
    • Amazon Prime Day 2026 deal sees Samsung Odyssey 49" 240Hz QD-OLED monitor at lowest price by Sayan Sen Earlier today we covered a very good deal on JBL's BAR 800 Dolby Atmos soundbar system as the unit is available for just $600 as part of Amazon Prime Day 2026 deals. That's not all though as there are many more discounts to choose from. If you are looking for a high-end monitor, Samsung's 49 inch G9 QD-OLED gaming monitor is a solid deal too as it's currently just $855 (purchase link under the specs table down below). It is a super-ultrawide (32:9) 1440p curved gaming monitor and as such should offer a very immersive experience. The G93SC is a 49-inch QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED) screen and that means it should have excellent contrast as well as color reproduction. Brightness is a bit lacking though so if you are looking to set it up in a relatively bright room, you may be better off with something else. Speaking of external light and brightness, the major difference on the G93SC vs the newer G93SD is that the latter comes with Samsung's "Glare Free" technology to reduce glare while the C model packs a glossy finish. The technical specifications of the Samsung G93SC are given in the table below: Specification Value Panel Type OLED Screen Shape Curved Screen Curvature 1800R Resolution DQHD (5120 × 1440) Aspect Ratio 32:9 Brightness (Typical) 250 cd/m² Brightness (Minimum) 200 cd/m² Contrast Ratio 1,000,000:1 HDR Support VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 HDR10+ HDR10+ Gaming Response Time 0.03 ms (GTG) Refresh Rate Up to 240 Hz Viewing Angle 178° Horizontal / 178° Vertical Color Support 1 Billion Colors Color Gamut 99% DCI-P3 (CIE1976) Adaptive Sync FreeSync Premium Pro / G-SYNC Compatible DisplayPort 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 HDMI 1 × HDMI 2.1 Micro HDMI 1 × Micro HDMI 2.1 USB Hub 3 × USB 3.0 Speakers Built-in Speaker Output 5W × 2 Channels Operating Temperature 10°C – 40°C Operating Humidity 10–80% (Non-condensing) Stand Type Height Adjustable Stand (HAS) Height Adjustment 120.0 ± 5.0 mm Tilt -2° (±2°) to 15° (±2°) Wall Mount 100 × 100 mm (VESA) Included HDMI Cable HDMI-to-Micro HDMI Cable Included DisplayPort Cable Yes Get it at the link below: Samsung 49" Odyssey G93SC Series Curved Gaming Monitor, QD-OLED: $854.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US with Prime) Prime subscription can be cancelled within three business days at no cost. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Actually Windows 11 is the GUI from Windows 10 X slapped onto Windows 10. Hence the many performance issues and initial limitations of the UI, like all the restrictions on the task bar placement and features. You could not even right click on the Taskbar and bring up task manager when it first shipped. Windows 10X was truly a new OS from the ground up. Basically a lightweight OS that ran containers for various app types. Win32 got its own container. Performance was not good and OEM’s pushed back on it, but wanted a new OS to push Pc sales. Hence Windows 11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_10X
    • Windows 10 was 6 years old when Microsoft revealed Windows 11. Does this mean Windows 12 is due next year?
    • Congratulations Windows.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!