Which direction for rear case fan to face?


Recommended Posts

This morning i stripped the PC to clean out all the dust. The only problem is i can't remember which way the rear case fan was facing.

 

It is an Akasa fan. On one side is a foil akasa badge in the middle with nothing covering the fan blades.

 

On the other side is a red akasa badge in the middle with like 'spider' legs blocking (if you will) access to the blades. Also on this side is the wiring for the fan.

 

There are 2 arrows on the base of the fan. One points to the side corner where the wiring has been ran to & the other arrow points towards the side that has the 'spider legs' & the red Akasa badge.

 

I'm just wondering which side of the fan should face OUTWARDS?

 

 

IMG_6900.JPG

IMG_6901.JPG

IMG_6902.JPG

Well either i've now installed it incorrectly (i've just put the label with the red writing to the outside) or i've had it installed incorrectly for years because the wire that connects to the motherboard is now no longer long enough (without loosening the tie).

 

The arrow is pointing to the outside now anyway.

 

Oh 7 i also have a front fan.

As far as I know, the rear fan is always pushing air out, specially if you have front fans which pull air inside.   Fans on the bottom should also pull air in while fans on the top, IMO, should push air out as well, because hot air goes up.

10 minutes ago, George P said:

As far as I know, the rear fan is always pushing air out, specially if you have front fans which pull air inside.   Fans on the bottom should also pull air in while fans on the top, IMO, should push air out as well, because hot air goes up.

Yeah that's what i was thinking also.

 

But i was at the time wondering which way around i should place the fan. Side 1 or side 2.

3 hours ago, Technique said:

Yeah that's what i was thinking also.

 

But i was at the time wondering which way around i should place the fan. Side 1 or side 2.

Your question was answered many times. The side with the logo faces in to the case the side without the logo faces towards the rear. That side blow the air out of the case. If you want to test it hold a tissue on it, it will go with the air flow.

fab.jpgpc-case-fan-direction-l-2337d2151ba630dd.jpg

2 minutes ago, xendrome said:

There are typically arrows on the plastic that show the airflow direction, but yes, air should flow from front to back.

Not all, but yes most 

11 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

I had no idea it took so may posts to determine the direction of air flow on a case fan.:)

I think he just missed the point with our other information...

The arrows are actually right there on the 3rd picture above your thumb.

 

The one pointing to the edge points to the direction of airflow, while the one pointing along the fan indicates rotation (not as important).

 

You would want to install the fan so that the arrow points to where you want the air to flow. Optimal direction for the rear is outwards as per everyone else's suggestion.

 

 

IMG_6902.jpg

36 minutes ago, Hum said:

Without looking at others posts, I always thought Rear fans sucked out heat, while a Front fan blew in air.

Always made sense to me considering that the PSU blows out.  Anytime I built a PC (which has been a while) I always faced the rear fans out.  Side fans out as well as the top fans.

My post from another thread:

 

There is rarely such as thing as "good air flow" - most people use the term mean some sort of imaginary diagram in their head of what the air is doing but in almost every case where is gets a real world test with a heat sensor gun, the imagination is wrong because humans and air think differently.

 

Without test equipment, the single thing completely in your power to accomplish is to aim a fan straight at the item you want to cool. With a modern mobo, it becomes trivial and most people use too many fans.

 

1. blow cool air from outside across cpu water radiator - in typical case, this means turning the fans around to blow the other way.

 

2. only in rare cases can you do anything about the typically weird GPU cooling, but when lucky give it cool air.

 

3. power supply comes with a fan - usually not much can be done with it

 

4. a case fan to blow cool outside air on mobo - usually any slow air movement is good enuff

 

5. a case fan to blow cool outside air on hard drives - usually any slow air movement is good enuff

 

6. rip out all other case fans - they typically just mess things up

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

It is so hard to get people to wrap there head around  a subject where "everybody knows" the answer. The old suck cool air in the front, blow out back myth was promoted by OEM manufacturers like Dell and HP during a time in computer history when components generated far less heat and the OEMS would also tweak the system with tight fitting cases and plastic air ducts all over the place.

 

So since I had a recent post handy, who knows, I might help somebody consider the mythology involved:

 

1. Sucking air requires suction! Suction requires a completely air tight enclosure.

 

2. Blowing air out of the case is similar to suction. A fan blowing outwards will grab the easiest available air which is usually nearby holes in the case. A fan blowing out is just generating Noise for almost no cooling effect.

 

3. Even if you had completely sealed suction which NEVER happens in real life, the air can still decide to do weird things which is why in the real engineering world air flow gets TESTED. Cars, airplanes, computer cases - all the same mysteries of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulence. So if you don't own a Heat Sensor Gun, it's all just guesswork.

 

4. What happens if you blow air inwards instead? A) it is cool air B) you know where it is going for about 6 inches C) it has no problem finding an exit route in a typical leaky case

 

10 minutes ago, techbeck said:

Always made sense to me considering that the PSU blows out.  Anytime I built a PC (which has been a while) I always faced the rear fans out.  Side fans out as well as the top fans.

Wow - that's a lot of fans doing nothing. Rip out all the fans blowing air out and leave the nice big air holes in their place. Most likely your temp measurements will be the same or lower and your ears will feel a liitle bit better.

9 minutes ago, DevTech said:

Wow - that's a lot of fans doing nothing. Rip out all the fans blowing air out and leave the nice big air holes in their place. Most likely your temp measurements will be the same or lower and your ears will feel a liitle bit better.

Just one case I bought.  Back when I wanted one that had blue lights and everything.  Had two big fans on the front blowing air in....small fan on the back, top, and side across from the CPU fan.  Fans didnt cause a lot of noise actually.  And that was back when the IDE ribbon cables were a PITA the route so they did not block airflow.  So helped lower the temp a little.  Most cases I bought just had a couple in the front and then the back.

8 minutes ago, JHBrown said:

For optimal performance, exhaust on the rear/top of the case, and intake up front. This is best for gaming, more FPS(Uber GPU cooling)...

 

 

J335f.jpg

Geesh....guy i used to work with actually suggested this.  Coworkers CPU fan died and his fix was to leave the case open and place a desktop fan to blow air on the CPU to keep it cool.  Needless to say, he was not around much after.

9 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Dev, just drop it. The OP got the message, don't give him a history lesson...

Oh but that is too narrow a point of view.

 

If I thought that the only recipient of what I type in any thread was the OP then I wouldn't be bothering with any of this. I am trying to help people for the benefit of all mankind so to speak since this information is available to the mighty Google.

 

Of course in this particular case I have almost no chance of stemming the tide of miss-information in the old and tired "blow air in the front and suck it out the back at the top because heat rises blah de blah useless meme"

 

Science is not about logical thinking which in this case seems to totally fail people, but instead the root of all Science is TESTING. You can use logic to form a starting hypothesis, but in the end the TESTING is the Science.

 

 

 

17 minutes ago, JHBrown said:

For optimal performance, exhaust on the rear/top of the case, and intake up front. Here is the best for gaming, more FPS(Uber GPU cooling)...

 

 

J335f.jpg

If you read my posts here, your part A) does nothing

 

But your part B) blow air right on the thing that needs cooling is exactly right and the picture is a great example of something that would actually work. If the fan has good bearings and runs at a slow speed, it will cool better and quieter than most solutions!

 

Now spray the whole thing in lime green paint and slap a NVIDIA logo on it...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!