Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've just moved to a new place and I've had to run a 10m CAT6 from my cable router to a small Netgear 5 port Gigabit switch to get to the other side of the room with a wired connection. Because I'm a bit of a perfectionist should I use CAT7 instead? Would I benefit from it or for that small distance is it worth it or is the improvement so small it makes no difference? All network experts help very welcome! 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1311168-cat6-or-cat7-at-home/
Share on other sites

no your not going to get faster with 7 vs 6..   7 is not even a recognized by TIA/EIA  Cat 6 with the new 802.3bz standard will allow 5gig so pretty sure you ok with 6 ;)

 

You know there is new 8 and 8.1 and 8.2 maybe you should look for that ;)  Gig is support by 5e anything over that is just not really needed. 5e cable will be able to do 2.5ghz under the new 802.3bz as soon as we start seeing switches and nics.

  • Like 3

Hi Mike! And thanks :) The cable is attached around the skirting boards of the walls so no. 

 

Thanks for the response +Budman. Is CAT6a & 7 not better for shielding etc? Would this not be better for connection speeds and a faster ping return? Or would it be so small of an increase it wouldn't make any difference? I have already put normal CAT6 in and all is fine, I get around 180mbps down from the router sometimes about 200mbps and the cable being used is a 10m Ethernet Cable CAT6 Full Copper FTP Screened Network Lead RJ45.

 

 

No its not going to make your ping times faster..  5e is rated for gig..  Your not going any faster than gig..  So how exactly would it make it faster?  If you want shielding then buy shielded 5e, or 6..

So essentially my Cat5 cable I have now is fine? Im guessing what I have is not shielded - 

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/White-10m-Ethernet-Cable-CAT6-Full-Copper-FTP-Screened-Network-Lead-RJ45-/380891748970?ssPageName=ADME:X:RRNTB:GB:3160

 

Thanks for your help.

Well that says ftp on it, so would assume its F/UTP or is F/FTP or S/FTP but I would assume F/UTP which means it has a foil shield around all the cables.  So your twisted pairs are not individually shielded.

 

Pretty much any home use case just plain jane UTP would be fine..

You will see ZERO difference.. Like I said UTP would be fine.. Your not running your cable over a transformer or electric generator or atop florescent lights are you?  Do run or tinker with electromagnetic generation in your spare time as a hobby near your networking equipment? Do you run your microwave with all the shielding removed? with your cable running next to it?

 

What do you think could possible be the difference?  Your ping times go from .4 ms to .399 ms?

 

Lets go over it a again.. You will see ZERO difference between a certified 5e cable or a 6 or even a 6a.. 7 or 8 or 8.1 or 8.2 your not going to see any difference in speed.  Now if you tried to use some cat 3 cable or some shoddy cat 5 that didn't work with gig.. Cat 5 is certified to be gig as well.  Then ok then you might see an issue.  I don't think normal cat 5 has been even made in years and years.  All 5e.. Which is fine.. What that cat 6 got was norhing more than a couple extra cents spent..

 

How long do you think it takes for the electrons to travel over that 10 m cable??  Do you think the speed of the electrons actually change if cable is 5e or 6?? The biggest delay in your traffic is that switch not the wire.  Does not matter if you bought that 10K$ ethernet cable http://arstechnica.com/staff/2015/02/to-the-audiophile-this-10000-ethernet-cable-apparently-makes-sense/ or the cable for 1 buck..  If its a certified cable then its fine. 

  • Like 1

i totally understand the need to get the "latest and greatest" but budman is right. Cat 5e is already rated for 1Gbit, so youre fine using that cable still. but then again, you said you used Cat 6 already, so youre good. no need to change anything.

Thats all I needed to hear :)

 

I'm no networking genius so I wanted to make sure as I've not even tinkered for some 6-7 years so not much has moved on since then. 

 

And nope +Budman so far I'm not networking near any energy power plants or putting the CAT6 near my home made electric chair so all is good :rolleyes:

 

Thanks Jason S I will leave it as it is :)

 

Thanks for your help guys! I appreciate it.

What that cat 6 buys him is now when/if he goes with 802.3bz when hardware becomes available he will be able to use the to get 5gbps over the cat 6.  Until such time all he got was a few extra cents spent on the cable.

 

If was in need a cable, what I would be concerned with is if actually a certified cable - then the options, like color ;)  Or end the boots on the end.  There are different styles that some are easier to remove from a nic/switch port than others.  Some can be a real pain - I don't like the ones with little plastic boots over the clip - some of those can be a pain to release if in a tight spot, etc.

 

Most likely the cost between a 5e and 6 with all other things being equal as far as options like the length, the boot type the color is going to be small - then sure get the cat 6.  But I sure wouldn't stress over it.  Especially if cable is going to be used in a place that is easy to replace for when you go to 10ge or 802.3bz

 

I have a 5e run in my attic that connects my computer room/office to the front of the house (av cabinet) when 802.3bz becomes available and affordable I will most likely switch out that cable.  But your talking maybe 30 mins or so to run the new cat 6 and a few bucks for the cable.  So I am not concerned that I went with 5e vs 6 back then.  At that point in time (few years back) is was a few $ difference so I just went with the 5e.

2 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Some can be a real pain - I don't like the ones with little plastic boots over the clip - some of those can be a pain to release if in a tight spot, etc.

 

I believe that satan was allowed to work on earth for one day, and he made that design. 

7 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

I have 1000 feet in a box that is labeled CAT6E .

 

cat6 - What is the difference between Cat 6 and Cat 6e Ethernet ...

6e is not a standard.

 

Quote

Cat 6e: Category 6 Enhanced (6e) is an augmented specification (not standard) designed to double transmission frequency to 500 MHz. By wrapping Category 6e in grounded foil shielding, full 10-Gigabit Ethernet speeds can be reached without sacrificing the max cable length of 100 meters.

 

3 minutes ago, sc302 said:

I see another 5-10 years before anything above 1Gb/s will be affordable for home use.

I don't see it being that long before your seeing 802.3bz at reasonable prices.  I would think more like 1-2 years.

4 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

it is better than standard

It is theoretically better than STANDARD QUALITY.  It may add to the AGREED STANDARD, but I would always always always get a cable that is rated precisely to an AGREED STANDARD.

 

Capitalisation to highlight the different usages of the word "standard" which I feel have been lost a little in the posts.

  • Like 2
Just now, Nik Louch said:

It is theoretically better than STANDARD QUALITY.  It may add to the AGREED STANDARD, but I would always always always get a cable that is rated precisely to an AGREED STANDARD.

 

Capitalisation to highlight the different usages of the word "standard" which I feel have been lost a little in the posts.

As one that use to use this wire it is way better than Cat6 as it is shielded. The shield is there for a reason. It is used in areas that require shielding.

3 hours ago, BudMan said:

How long do you think it takes for the electrons to travel over that 10 m cable??  Do you think the speed of the electrons actually change if cable is 5e or 6?? 

To be pedantic, the electrons don't actually need to travel from one end to the other to carry information; it's the wave (electromagnetic wave) propagating from one to the next that does.

3 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

As one that use to use this wire it is way better than Cat6 as it is shielded. The shield is there for a reason. It is used in areas that require shielding.

Completely agreed that it is theoretically and potentially practically better.  But saying it's "better than standard" is an ambiguous thing to say - the word standard is being thrown around in different contexts.  I would always adhere to an agreed standard specification - and if shielding is your bad, there are agreed standard specifications for that.  6e is not an agreed standard specification.

Just now, Andre S. said:

To be pedantic, the electrons don't actually need to travel from one end to the other to carry information; it's the wave (electromagnetic wave) propagating from one to the next that does.

You see, it's like a pipe, and there's a big bucket at one end... ;)

1 hour ago, BudMan said:

I don't see it being that long before your seeing 802.3bz at reasonable prices.  I would think more like 1-2 years.

Supposedly ASUS are not interested in adding 802.bz support in their routers. They plan to move directly to 10GbE, but I don't know the timeframe. Bit stupid if you ask me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!