Single instance of tinyproxy Or have to setup multiple instances of tinyproxy


Recommended Posts

My VM has 5 private IP addresses: 10.20.57.11 - 15

I have to map different outbound WAN IP for each of the above IP.

10.20.57.11 -- mapped to 20.20.20.20

10.20.57.12 -- mapped to 20.20.20.21

and so on..

I can get it done  through the firewall.

 

Now what I want is to setup a forward proxy on port 9090 for all private IPs such that

--- when 10.20.57.11:9090 is used in browser settings, the user will get WAN IP 20.20.20.20

--- when 10.20.57.12:9090 is used in browser settings, the user will get WAN IP 20.20.20.21

and so on

 

Can this be achieved through single instance of tinyproxy? Or we have to setup multiple instances of tinyproxy with different IPs?

 

Any other better approach would also do... thanks in advance.

 

 

 

What firewall are you doing this in?

--> Its Cisco FIrepower 4120

 

you already mapped your outbound traffic?

--> Even though outbound traffic is mapped in fw, do we not need any service on some port for users to use?

--> users will not have access to the server but can only use the service through their browsers.

 

 

so you want a reverse proxy?  Running inside your firewall?  And you want it listening on 9090??

 

Sorry dude but at a complete loss to what your trying to accomplish here. 

 

If you have some services behind a firewall, and you own multiple public IPs.  And you have configured your services to use different public IPs?  Why do you not just do a simple port forward on the normal ports?  if you want an added security of a reverse proxy or the ability to get to multiple private IPs via the name in the uri .. like http://www.domaina.com vs http://www.domainb.com ok then.

 

But as of your current posts I just do not get what your wanting to do?? 

  • 2 weeks later...
  On 23/10/2016 at 14:01, BudMan said:

so you want a reverse proxy?  Running inside your firewall?  And you want it listening on 9090??

 

Sorry dude but at a complete loss to what your trying to accomplish here. 

 

If you have some services behind a firewall, and you own multiple public IPs.  And you have configured your services to use different public IPs?  Why do you not just do a simple port forward on the normal ports?  if you want an added security of a reverse proxy or the ability to get to multiple private IPs via the name in the uri .. like http://www.domaina.com vs http://www.domainb.com ok then.

 

But as of your current posts I just do not get what your wanting to do?? 

Expand  

Simple port forward is what we used to do till now.  Only IT personnel have access on these servers (that other team members will not have access to these) and  IT use to port forward to mentioned servers and then other team in the office use to access it locally. But we have to remove dependency of IT on productivity of other team. Sometimes IT are busy with other tasks to work on their requests efficiently.

 

For this reason we have to deploy a mechanism for other team members to use specific IP (different private nw) and port to have  outbound requests going through specific WAN IP.

 

so you want a reverse proxy?  ---- > No, I want a forward proxy running inside the firewall listening on port 9090 so that other team members can access the service.

 

Sorry if I am not able to explain it properly

 

 

"For this reason we have to deploy a mechanism for other team members to use specific IP (different private nw) and port to have  outbound requests going through specific WAN IP."

 

What???

 

So these servers are open to the public??  I am at a complete and utter loss to what your wanting to do??  If you have servers on your network that you do not want users to access locally.  But they are available to the public??  That makes ZERO freaking sense.

 

If you have local webserver, what could they be doing that you don't want your company users to access?  They sure would not have access to admin the servers, etc.

 

Sure if you want to put a proxy local to access something local, and then create a firewall rule to only allow that proxy to access that something.  You sure and the hell do not need multiple proxies running to do that..

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • LG Electronics sees profit dip but boosts shareholder returns by Paul Hill LG Electronics (LGE) has reported consolidated sales of 20.74 trillion Korean Won (approximately $15.14 billion USD) and an operating profit of 639.4 billion Korean Won (approximately $466.75 million USD) for the second quarter of 2025. The firm saw both its revenue and operating profits decline year-over-year due to external factors such as US tariff policies, ongoing geopolitical issues in the Middle East, and a slowdown in consumer spending. While the company has faced challenges, the company is aiming for what it called qualitative growth by strengthening its subscription services, direct online sales, and business-to-business (B2B) segments. Key areas of growth for LGE include automotive electronics, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, and the webOS platform. The US tariffs are a major headache for companies around the world, given the size of the market there and President Trump's demands for bringing manufacturing to the States. To combat the rising US tariffs, LGE is trying to optimize global production and refine its market-specific approaches for premium and mass-market products. While the company’s profits dipped, it announced an interim dividend of 500 Korean Won (approximately $0.37 USD) per share for both common and preferred, with another payout later in the year that should take the total for 2025 to at least 1,000 Korean Won (approximately $0.73 USD). You must be holding the stock on August 8, 2025, to get the payout on August 22, 2025. The firm also said it will cancel 761,427 common treasury shares on July 31, 2025, making shares more scarce which could increase the value of remaining shares for investors. In terms of LGE’s various business divisions, things were mixed. Its Home Appliance Solution (HS) business achieved year-over-year sales growth, maintaining profitability, thanks to a dual strategy for premium and volume segments and growth in online sales and subscriptions. Its Media Entertainment Solution (MS) business experienced declines in sales and operating profits with the latter turning negative due to market uncertainties and stiff competition. Its Vehicle Solution (VS) business showed growth in sales and operating profit thanks to increased orders from European automotive makers. Finally, its Eco Solution (ES) business saw domestic sales increase, but overseas sales growth was limited due to US tariffs. This led to a slight year-over-year drop in operating profit due to higher costs. Image via Depositphotos.com
    • "Microsoft plans to remove the MSN feed..." Yaaay, finally the horrible dumpster fire of badly translated tabloid trash is going away! Good riddance! "...and replace it with Copilot Discover..." Oh ffs...
    • Similar to how Nvidia stopped caring about the consumer market a while ago and now just pays lip service to it because it prints money.
    • Yep same as every company, sadly. The biggest bank in Australia just laid off a bunch of staff even though they made record profits, then advertised the roles in India
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Itbob513626 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Itbob513626 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      EdwardFranciscoVilla went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Week One Done
      MoJo624 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      aeganwn earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      618
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      243
    3. 3
      Xenon
      159
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      126
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      122
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!