• 0

Definitive Best PAID Antivirus 2017


Definitive Best PAID Antivirus 2017  

102 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you choose?

    • Avast! Pro/Internet Security
    • AVG Antivirus PRO/Internet Security
    • Avira Antivirus Premium/Pro/Endpoint
    • BitDefender Anti-Virus/Internet Security/Total Security
    • Comodo Endpoint Security/Internet Security Pro
      0
    • Dr. Web Anti-Virus/Security Space
      0
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Internet Security
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security/Endpoint Security
    • F-Secure
    • Kaspersky Anti-Virus
    • MalwareBytes Anti-Malware PRO
    • McAfee Antivirus
      0
    • Panda Antivirus/Internet Security
    • Secureaplus
    • Sophos Endpoint
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
    • Trend Micro Anti-Virus/Internet Security
    • Vipre Antivirus
      0
    • Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus
    • ZoneAlarm Pro
      0
    • Other (please specify below)


Question

It's a new year, and so we have a new poll for Definitive Best Paid Antivirus.The 2016 thread can be found here.


This is a poll for best PAID antivirus software. There is a separate thread for FREE antivirus software here
 
If your choice of paid antivirus software is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1317868-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2017/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
32 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

EXACTLY!

When someone mentions another AV is better than webroot - I automatically assume its because they havent tried webroot.


FWIW - I have given a couple neowinians a webroot license for them to try it out  - I havent had 1 person tell me they uninstalled it...

 

we have deployed it as a second layer of protection in a corp setting, we are forced to use Symantec corp, but webroot happily runs alongside, webroot themselves have been awesome tbh, first a 30day trial, then extended to 60 then 90 days all free. 

 

  • 0
2 minutes ago, Mando said:

we have deployed it as a second layer of protection in a corp setting, we are forced to use Symantec corp, but webroot happily runs alongside, webroot themselves have been awesome tbh, first a 30day trial, then extended to 60 then 90 days all free. 

 

Yes they are quite awesome.  They were eager to give me a super license to help "get the word out".  But I havent gone nuts and have been discreet about who I let have a license, which I am sure is why they keep renewing it for me every 2 years for free. :)

  • 0
2 minutes ago, T3X4S said:

Yes they are quite awesome.  They were eager to give me a super license to help "get the word out".  But I havent gone nuts and have been discreet about who I let have a license, which I am sure is why they keep renewing it for me every 2 years for free. :)

put it this way, if its good enough for Checkpoint Technologies to integrate in their firewalls and UTM solutions, that says bucketloads to me.

  • 0

I had a Bitdefender Internet Security suite but it was more of a pain to run with than any supposed benefit so I've gone back to Windows Defender - period. I feel there is no real need to any third party AV and that most simply fall prey to marketing and/or paranoia. But if $50 makes a person "feel" safe then by all means... go for it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!