Recommended Posts

I have cisco nexus 3548 and I created a monitor session while as 10Gi source port gi1/0/1 and 10Gi destination port Gi1/0/24. So my source port has 10Gi duplex traffic while my destination is only able to receive 5Gi duplex traffic.

 

I have a scenario as I have 30 10Gi lines ie. each line will be having 10Gi tx traffic and 10Gi rx traffic, so now I want to create 30 span/monitor session such that I can do one-to-one port mirroring of each of these lines at a single instance of time.

So my present limitation is my cisco 3548 switchcan have only 2 maximum active span session at single instance of time with also the limitation of only able to mirror 5 gi taffic when traffic exceeds 5Gi.

 

So now I want to purchase a switch which can fulfill my above scenario ie. having 30 active span session at a single instance of time while able to mirror all traffic without any limitation.

Budget is not an issue so please let me know if anybody can suggest

huh??  Why and the hell would you need 30 span sessions?

 

Also your saying you are seeing 10ge of traffic on port your spanning, but on the span your only able to see 1/2 of it??  Then I would guess you set the sampling to 2.. where you only see 1 out of 2 packets.. This is setting that can be adjusted.. Didn't think sampling was on by default so you must of turned it on.  Or your only doing 1 direction ie ingress or egress?

 

If I look here..

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus3548/sw/verified_scalability/6_x/b_N3548_Verified_Scalability_6_x/verified-scalability.html

 

Says it can do 4 bi-directional sessions.

 

Pretty sure you can do some really odd things if you enable the warp span licensing on those switches.  Those switches are low latency switches..

 

If your wanting to monitor traffic of 30 different ports all the same time.. Your talking using taps not the switch itself..  I know of no switch that can do that many active span sessions..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • That's helpful, thanks. The key issue as I see it is that the issuer of the verification is still getting that request from WhateverNaughty.com, which immediately becomes a problem if this is a government issuer, etc. but it's a huge problem for any user with any issuer. I guess the solution, and maybe this goes without saying and I've missed it in your fine posts, is that the requester is also anonymized. That way, the issuer doesn't have a record of X person requested verification for Y website. And anyone who hacks that data is going to get precisely nothing. This only works is, as you say, this is a one-time challenge each time, and we all agree that no one is keeping/storing that data for any use anyway. After all, "is this person 18+ age" would only respond Yes/No, which is hardly actionable by anyone...as long as the asker only gets Yes/No and the Answerer doesn't know or care who's asking. :) Are both ends anonymized?
    • It definitely can be especially if you live in a dorm or frat/sorority house during your time in college. However, for many who live at home or in their own off campus residence and commute to classes it can be just about the classes. That is how it was for me. Except for classes, time in the library and some time in the student union mostly for eating and taking a break between classes, I was never on compus
    • As one person commented on my use of my old Pocophone, they are also MP3 players.
    • They do not. I know this personally, but let's use some evidence instead. For example, Europe and other nations aren't drenched in neverending ads like we are (think soccer being the most popular world sport and yet there are no ads during/delaying the gameplay itself, unlike every sport in America). The truth is that it's all just a ridiculous shell game between marketing/ad people who want to keep their jobs and websites/networks who want to keep charging for air time for ads to be funded. And, of course, the enshittification of everything for ever increasing quarterly returns for Wall Street only matters here, not everywhere else. We all know that consumers ignore commercials and block the ads now, so we know it doesn't lead to enough sales to justify this cashola merry-go-round. But they are still thinking like this is still the good old days of TV and, quite frankly, they don't know any better... The better solution, of course, is sponsorship -- a way of advertising your product and associations in a meaningful way, without bombarding annoyed consumers with the same damn ad for the same damn product at every single forced commercial break.
    • That is also my understanding of Apple's support for their older devices.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Celilo earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      447
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      166
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      153
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      macoman
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!