Trying to block a site using hosts file in windows 10, but it's not blocking


Recommended Posts

I am attempting to block a website using the hosts file in win10. I am using the format 127.0.0.1 site.name (does it mater if it's just domain.com does it need the http in front?), saving it (using notepad w/ admin privileges) and then double checking the file. I have even reset the system and it still seems to just ignore the fact that the site in question is blocked. Am I doing something incorrect, or is there something else that needs to be done?

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 21:57, jnelsoninjax said:

I am attempting to block a website using the hosts file in win10. I am using the format 127.0.0.1 site.name, saving it (using notepad w/ admin privileges) and then double checking the file. I have even reset the system and it still seems to just ignore the fact that the site in question is blocked. Am I doing something incorrect, or is there something else that needs to be done?

Expand  

What browser are you testing this with?

Instead of 127.0.0.1, try 0.0.0.0. I currently use https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts to filter traffic, an thats what they use. Hope it helps

  On 16/01/2017 at 22:03, kurupy said:

Instead of 127.0.0.1, try 0.0.0.0. I currently use https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts to filter traffic, an thats what they use. Hope it helps

Expand  

I tried the 0.0.0.0 as well, I noticed that address was in the hosts file already from another program, and I tried replicating that as well, at this point IDK if the issue is that the site is cached and FF is loading the cached version or if there's something else going on.

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:06, jnelsoninjax said:

I tried the 0.0.0.0 as well, I noticed that address was in the hosts file already from another program, and I tried replicating that as well, at this point IDK if the issue is that the site is cached and FF is loading the cached version or if there's something else going on.

Expand  

Try clearing the cache and attempt to visit the website again.

  On 16/01/2017 at 22:08, Circaflex said:

Try clearing the cache and attempt to visit the website again.

Expand  

No effect. Site still loads just fine. Also just a FYI the FF has no extensions installed, so there is no conflict there.

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:08, sc302 said:

If I wanted to block google with a host file this is what I would do


127.0.0.1 google.com


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Expand  

That is exactly how I have it setup: 127.0.0.1 website.com I also have it as 0.0.0.0 website.com

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:17, exotoxic said:

Did you try cleaning the DNS cache?

cmd --> ipconfig /flushdns

Expand  

Had not thought about that, I give it a go.

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:18, jnelsoninjax said:

Had not thought about that, I give it a go.

Expand  

Again, nothing.

Tried in Edge, still goes through

  • Like 1

Why not use opendns or some other block to block the sites you don't want them or yourself to visit. There are far better solutions than to use a host file.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  On 16/01/2017 at 22:25, Circaflex said:

Random thought, but have you tried rebooting after making the edits and attempting to visit the webpage?

Expand  

Not every time, but after initial change I rebooted the machine.

So far I have 1) Cleared the Cache 2)Flushed the DNS 3) Removed all cookies.

@sc302, I am going to do that now! I realized just as you said it that I have the router configured to use OpenDNS and Google's DNS as well, I check which one is the primary (hopefully OpenDNS)

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 23:10, sc302 said:

If you create an account with opendns, you will be able to add your site/house/home internet and block access by category or by site name.  It is free to setup.

Expand  

Well it turns out that there is no way to set the router (Linksys WRT1900AC) to use OpenDNS, it will always default to the ISP's DNS server, which is asinine, but after some extensive research I have determined that to be the case for this router, at least until I install and open source firmware on it.

  • Like 1
  On 17/01/2017 at 00:29, jnelsoninjax said:

Well it turns out that there is no way to set the router (Linksys WRT1900AC) to use OpenDNS, it will always default to the ISP's DNS server, which is asinine, but after some extensive research I have determined that to be the case for this router, at least until I install and open source firmware on it.

Expand  

I assume you are using a static IP if that is the case? If it is dynamic, yu can use a different DNS. You do that by providing the OpenDNS IPs in the DHCP Server settings on the Local Network tab of the Connectivity page.

 

 

they also have a config page here for that router https://support.opendns.com/hc/en-us/articles/228008007-Configuration-for-Linksys-Cisco-AC175-EA6300-EA6500-EA6900-WRT1900AC

  On 17/01/2017 at 00:29, jnelsoninjax said:

Well it turns out that there is no way to set the router (Linksys WRT1900AC) to use OpenDNS, it will always default to the ISP's DNS server, which is asinine, but after some extensive research I have determined that to be the case for this router, at least until I install and open source firmware on it.

Expand  

you are looking in the wrong place.  change the dns to point to opendns in the below screenshot.

 

some give you the opportunity to change it in the internet setting tab (or whatever the equivalent terminology is in the different hardware manufacturers gui), others you change it in the local area connection, LAN or DHCP location). 

 

 

1.jpg

  On 17/01/2017 at 01:14, Circaflex said:

I assume you are using a static IP if that is the case? If it is dynamic, yu can use a different DNS. You do that by providing the OpenDNS IPs in the DHCP Server settings on the Local Network tab of the Connectivity page.

 

 

they also have a config page here for that router https://support.opendns.com/hc/en-us/articles/228008007-Configuration-for-Linksys-Cisco-AC175-EA6300-EA6500-EA6900-WRT1900AC

Expand  

Thanks for that info!

  On 17/01/2017 at 02:23, sc302 said:

you are looking in the wrong place.  change the dns to point to opendns in the below screenshot.

 

some give you the opportunity to change it in the internet setting tab (or whatever the equivalent terminology is in the different hardware manufacturers gui), others you change it in the local area connection, LAN or DHCP location). 

 

 

1.jpg

Expand  

You're correct, I was reading/looking in the wrong spot on the config page!

  • Like 1

Success! I finally got it to block the site in question via OpenDNS! Talk about a giant PITA, but I finally got it.

  • Like 3

Did you bother to do a simple test if host file entry was being used?

 

Edit host file as admin, put in your entries and then try and ping..  If this something else has been looked up recently then you would need to flush the cache..

 

This really is clickity clickity stuff.. So couple things - your browser had it cached, using a proxy so it doesn't even ask local system or dns - the proxy gets asked, etc. Your running some antivirus that prevents changes to hosts file sort of thing.. But its like 2 seconds to validate if what your putting in the host file is being used..

hostfile.png

 

blocksite.png

 

You have to make sure what your putting in the host file is what is actually being looked up too..  ie if your not going to say www.google.com then google.com would work, etc.

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello Could you be kind too help me fix this 3.1gig and not 256gig it says 3.1gig only .someone told me to fix it with this https://www.disk-partition.com/articles/64gb-flash-drive-only-showing-32gb-5740i.html yes my sandisk ultra usb 3.0 256gb wont show up in full .  but i don't know want options i have to use on there can someone  please guide me with step by step instructions please  guide me with step by step instructions on how to repair this .sorry for asking but I've tried but i don't know want i have to do on that programme please help me i am on windows 11 home thank you nick
    • AI is as big a scam as FTX was...run by the same 'group' of people as well.
    • Slack Business+ plan jumps to $15/month as AI features launch by Paul Hill Salesforce has announced a price increase for one of its plans, which will add a few dollars per user each month to organizations' bills. The Slack Business+ plan will see prices rise from $12.50 to $15 per user per month if you pay for a whole year up front; if you pay monthly, the bill will increase from $15 to $18. Salesforce has kept the prices of its Pro plan the same and introduced a new Enterprise+ plan with custom prices for larger organizations. The new price adjustments will take effect on August 17 if you’re planning to renew, and immediately for any new customers. So, if you are renewing before August 17, you will be able to delay this price rise for around a year. The company isn’t just pulling a fast one on customers with these price rises. It’s adding AI to all paid plans, so if you use these features, the increase somewhat justifies them. We saw a similar tactic from Google Workspace back in January. New AI features and deeper Salesforce integration Slack has outlined all the new AI features coming to its Pro, Business+, and Enterprise+ plans starting from July 17. The Pro Plan will have access to conversation and thread summaries, plus huddle notes, while Business+ will have all of those plus: AI Search, Recaps, Translations, File summaries, Workflow generation, and Summarize channels workflow step. The Enterprise+ subscription has all those AI features plus Enterprise search. Additionally, it provides enhanced security, admin controls, governance, and compliance. The company also announced that all plans, including the free plan, will get access to Salesforce Channels, which lets you use Slack and Salesforce together directly within their Customer 360 Apps. Who benefits? By embedding AI right within Slack, organizations should be able to boost efficiency more easily in their daily operations. To ensure that it keeps up with the competition, the company is investing significant resources into its research and development to deliver new innovations. Affected organizations will need to try to find effective ways to use these AI tools to make the price increase worth it, whether this is speeding up tasks to free workers up for other work or something else. The move definitely doesn’t hurt Slack because it’ll make more money whether you use these AI tools or not.
    • Which illegal products? I am asking for a friend.
    • Not having a backup on Earth and another on the moon and another on Mars is also a redundancy failure. Not having a backup in another galaxy is a redundancy failure
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      vivetool earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      pnajbar earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      TBithoney earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      xuxlix earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      Tomek Święcicki earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      675
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      288
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      224
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      195
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      144
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!