Trying to block a site using hosts file in windows 10, but it's not blocking


Recommended Posts

I am attempting to block a website using the hosts file in win10. I am using the format 127.0.0.1 site.name (does it mater if it's just domain.com does it need the http in front?), saving it (using notepad w/ admin privileges) and then double checking the file. I have even reset the system and it still seems to just ignore the fact that the site in question is blocked. Am I doing something incorrect, or is there something else that needs to be done?

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 21:57, jnelsoninjax said:

I am attempting to block a website using the hosts file in win10. I am using the format 127.0.0.1 site.name, saving it (using notepad w/ admin privileges) and then double checking the file. I have even reset the system and it still seems to just ignore the fact that the site in question is blocked. Am I doing something incorrect, or is there something else that needs to be done?

Expand  

What browser are you testing this with?

Instead of 127.0.0.1, try 0.0.0.0. I currently use https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts to filter traffic, an thats what they use. Hope it helps

  On 16/01/2017 at 22:03, kurupy said:

Instead of 127.0.0.1, try 0.0.0.0. I currently use https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts to filter traffic, an thats what they use. Hope it helps

Expand  

I tried the 0.0.0.0 as well, I noticed that address was in the hosts file already from another program, and I tried replicating that as well, at this point IDK if the issue is that the site is cached and FF is loading the cached version or if there's something else going on.

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:06, jnelsoninjax said:

I tried the 0.0.0.0 as well, I noticed that address was in the hosts file already from another program, and I tried replicating that as well, at this point IDK if the issue is that the site is cached and FF is loading the cached version or if there's something else going on.

Expand  

Try clearing the cache and attempt to visit the website again.

  On 16/01/2017 at 22:08, Circaflex said:

Try clearing the cache and attempt to visit the website again.

Expand  

No effect. Site still loads just fine. Also just a FYI the FF has no extensions installed, so there is no conflict there.

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:08, sc302 said:

If I wanted to block google with a host file this is what I would do


127.0.0.1 google.com


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Expand  

That is exactly how I have it setup: 127.0.0.1 website.com I also have it as 0.0.0.0 website.com

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:17, exotoxic said:

Did you try cleaning the DNS cache?

cmd --> ipconfig /flushdns

Expand  

Had not thought about that, I give it a go.

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 22:18, jnelsoninjax said:

Had not thought about that, I give it a go.

Expand  

Again, nothing.

Tried in Edge, still goes through

  • Like 1

Why not use opendns or some other block to block the sites you don't want them or yourself to visit. There are far better solutions than to use a host file.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  On 16/01/2017 at 22:25, Circaflex said:

Random thought, but have you tried rebooting after making the edits and attempting to visit the webpage?

Expand  

Not every time, but after initial change I rebooted the machine.

So far I have 1) Cleared the Cache 2)Flushed the DNS 3) Removed all cookies.

@sc302, I am going to do that now! I realized just as you said it that I have the router configured to use OpenDNS and Google's DNS as well, I check which one is the primary (hopefully OpenDNS)

  • Like 1
  On 16/01/2017 at 23:10, sc302 said:

If you create an account with opendns, you will be able to add your site/house/home internet and block access by category or by site name.  It is free to setup.

Expand  

Well it turns out that there is no way to set the router (Linksys WRT1900AC) to use OpenDNS, it will always default to the ISP's DNS server, which is asinine, but after some extensive research I have determined that to be the case for this router, at least until I install and open source firmware on it.

  • Like 1
  On 17/01/2017 at 00:29, jnelsoninjax said:

Well it turns out that there is no way to set the router (Linksys WRT1900AC) to use OpenDNS, it will always default to the ISP's DNS server, which is asinine, but after some extensive research I have determined that to be the case for this router, at least until I install and open source firmware on it.

Expand  

I assume you are using a static IP if that is the case? If it is dynamic, yu can use a different DNS. You do that by providing the OpenDNS IPs in the DHCP Server settings on the Local Network tab of the Connectivity page.

 

 

they also have a config page here for that router https://support.opendns.com/hc/en-us/articles/228008007-Configuration-for-Linksys-Cisco-AC175-EA6300-EA6500-EA6900-WRT1900AC

  On 17/01/2017 at 00:29, jnelsoninjax said:

Well it turns out that there is no way to set the router (Linksys WRT1900AC) to use OpenDNS, it will always default to the ISP's DNS server, which is asinine, but after some extensive research I have determined that to be the case for this router, at least until I install and open source firmware on it.

Expand  

you are looking in the wrong place.  change the dns to point to opendns in the below screenshot.

 

some give you the opportunity to change it in the internet setting tab (or whatever the equivalent terminology is in the different hardware manufacturers gui), others you change it in the local area connection, LAN or DHCP location). 

 

 

1.jpg

  On 17/01/2017 at 01:14, Circaflex said:

I assume you are using a static IP if that is the case? If it is dynamic, yu can use a different DNS. You do that by providing the OpenDNS IPs in the DHCP Server settings on the Local Network tab of the Connectivity page.

 

 

they also have a config page here for that router https://support.opendns.com/hc/en-us/articles/228008007-Configuration-for-Linksys-Cisco-AC175-EA6300-EA6500-EA6900-WRT1900AC

Expand  

Thanks for that info!

  On 17/01/2017 at 02:23, sc302 said:

you are looking in the wrong place.  change the dns to point to opendns in the below screenshot.

 

some give you the opportunity to change it in the internet setting tab (or whatever the equivalent terminology is in the different hardware manufacturers gui), others you change it in the local area connection, LAN or DHCP location). 

 

 

1.jpg

Expand  

You're correct, I was reading/looking in the wrong spot on the config page!

  • Like 1

Success! I finally got it to block the site in question via OpenDNS! Talk about a giant PITA, but I finally got it.

  • Like 3

Did you bother to do a simple test if host file entry was being used?

 

Edit host file as admin, put in your entries and then try and ping..  If this something else has been looked up recently then you would need to flush the cache..

 

This really is clickity clickity stuff.. So couple things - your browser had it cached, using a proxy so it doesn't even ask local system or dns - the proxy gets asked, etc. Your running some antivirus that prevents changes to hosts file sort of thing.. But its like 2 seconds to validate if what your putting in the host file is being used..

hostfile.png

 

blocksite.png

 

You have to make sure what your putting in the host file is what is actually being looked up too..  ie if your not going to say www.google.com then google.com would work, etc.

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9060 XT launches above MSRP and is available to buy now by Sayan Sen At Computex 2025 this year, AMD announced its RX 9060 XT mid-range desktop GPUs. The new graphics card landed in both 8GB and 16GB flavors and targets 1080p as well as light 1440p gaming. The community and some of the media criticized the 8GB VRAM model, but AMD defended the move explaining how the smaller memory buffer is not a cause of worry for the majority. Both the 8 GB and the 16 GB RX 9060 XT are now available for purchase. A new driver is out too with Adrenalin version 25.6.1. However, as always, day one stocks would likely be highly limited, similar to other GPUs or any other product, like the Nintendo Switch 2, that also landed today. Third-party AIB (add in board) vendors like Gigabyte, for example, are selling the 8GB at $329 (SEP is $299) currently on Amazon US, so expect some markup. The technical specifications of the Radeon RX 9060 XT are given below: Specification Value GPU Architecture AMD RDNA™ 4 Core Compute Units 32 Video Memory 16 GB / 8GB GDDR6 Infinity Cache 32 MB Core Boost Clock Up to 3.13 GHz Memory speed/bandwidth 20 Gbps / 320 GB/s AI Performance 821 TOPS (INT4 with sparsity) Raytracing & AI Accelerators 32 3rd Generation Raytracing Accelerators; 64 2nd Generation AI Accelerators PCIe Interface PCIe® 5.0 x16 Display Outputs DisplayPort™ 2.1a, HDMI® 2.1b Total Board Power (TBP) 160W* If you notice, we have an asterisk for the TBP value in the table above. That is because AMD says that it can vary between 150 and 182 watts. Performance-wise, we know the $349 16 GB variant is close to the Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti in rasterization but falls behind in ray tracing. Meanwhile, the 8GB model, priced the same as the GeForce RTX 5060 at $299, should be better, as both 8 Gig and 16 Gig SKUs are identical spec-wise outside of memory capacity. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It actually looks decent, although trailers could make the worst nonsense look watchable sometimes. I'm not a fan of the "extended" Aliens universe (Prometheus, Covenant), but I liked Romulus so will definitely give this a shot.
    • I just don't think it's possible for a government to be 100% state-owned in its companies. Every government depends on private technologies to function. There are very smart technology teams at Google, Microsoft, Intel, AMD, Nvidia, IBM, Apple, Amazon. What the US government wants are these people working together.
    • I agree with keeping defense contractors local, but... The goal proposed here isn't to cut spending (though I think that is also a worthy goal), the goal is to ensure spending is being properly accounted for. I'm not sure why working with US based companies would make proper accounting more difficult than going international. I assume the point you are making is that after several rounds of audit failures and cuts, they would be forced to look for cheaper venders, but again, PASS THE F***ING AUDIT, then the cuts don't happen. Everyone was losing their minds when some of the Covid PPP money was misused, and yes, that was bad, but the DoD misplaces many times that amount of money every year, and no one seems to care. It is totally unacceptable for the 2nd biggest government expenditure to be an unaccountable black box.
    • I don't know man.. when I go incognito and I fill in an amount and click on Donate with Debit or credit card, it takes me to a page where I can choose the country and bank/credit card details to fill in. It does not require a PayPal account. No biggie either way.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      jbatch earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Yianis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      GTRoberts went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      406
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      181
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      175
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      170
    5. 5
      Xenon
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!