Ryzen is a monster, Intel preparing 12 core desktop CPU to combat it


Recommended Posts

According to various benchmark leaks over the past several days, compiled and analyzed in the video below AMD Ryzen 1700X and 1800X are beating Intel i7 6950X (10/20 CPU that costs over 1700$) in synthetic multithreaded benchmarks. Apparently Intel has no chip in their desktop lineup to counter the Ryzen and some info appeared that they will go for 12 core solution ASAP. It is really crazy how fast AMD's baby seems to be.

 

 

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, LostCat said:

I believe some of it, but I'm not going to crow about it until the reviews and product are actually out.  All this half baked prerelease hype is just so much noise.

No Mans Sky...

  • Like 4
9 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I believe some of it, but I'm not going to crow about it until the reviews and product are actually out.  All this half baked prerelease hype is just so much noise.

Of course these are to be taken with a grain of salt, but considering that the information from multiple sources is more or less the same I am leaning towards these being legit. In the end we are few days from NDA lift, but this makes me truly excited even if I will not build Ryzen PC any time soon as i7 3770k still works well for what I need it.

13 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

if Ryzen can help drive prices down that's all I really care about in the end :)

Prices down ... performance up. :) 

 

I hope all the hype is real ... and Intel responds in kind. 

 

Competition is good ...

  • Like 3

I'm still trying to see the benefit of replacing my 3rd gen i7. My PC doesnt skip a beat in any games, most are played on high settings and if anything, replacing the GPU would be top of my list otherwise I can't justify replacing anything.

 

However, I am glad AMD are finally back in the race, Intel have dominated for far too long.

15 minutes ago, StrikedOut said:

I'm still trying to see the benefit of replacing my 3rd gen i7. My PC doesnt skip a beat in any games, most are played on high settings and if anything, replacing the GPU would be top of my list otherwise I can't justify replacing anything.

 

However, I am glad AMD are finally back in the race, Intel have dominated for far too long.

A lot of people still think their 2600k or older kit is still good enough, and there are a lot of situations where it really isn't.  I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people think their kit is better than it is...I know I did.

 

(related article, not mine obviously - ) http://techreport.com/review/31410/a-bridge-too-far-migrating-from-sandy-to-kaby-lake

42 minutes ago, Yogurth said:

Of course these are to be taken with a grain of salt, but considering that the information from multiple sources is more or less the same I am leaning towards these being legit. In the end we are few days from NDA lift, but this makes me truly excited even if I will not build Ryzen PC any time soon as i7 3770k still works well for what I need it.

I'm not saying it's wrong, just that it's noise.  I'd far rather have a general picture of games people actually play and storage benchmarks and other things that will affect me directly rather than a few nigh useless general purpose benchmarks and some games I don't even care about.

 

I just think it'll be worth the wait just to have reviews from people who put the time and effort into giving you the whole picture.

18 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I'm not saying it's wrong, just that it's noise.  I'd far rather have a general picture of games people actually play and storage benchmarks and other things that will affect me directly rather than a few nigh useless general purpose benchmarks and some games I don't even care about.

 

I just think it'll be worth the wait just to have reviews from people who put the time and effort into giving you the whole picture.

At the 5:15 mark of the video there is a screenshot of a sheet with various benchmarks and power consumption (this is also surprising how efficient Ryzen is) , the lower half of the table is filled with gaming benchmarks. Even here Ryzen looks good.

1 hour ago, Brandon H said:

if Ryzen can help drive prices down that's all I really care about in the end :)

A few days ago intel slashed prices on a bunch of chips - the 6950X dropped 35% I believe.
Some, dropped as much as 50%.

This is great for consumers for that simple fact.
If this chip comes out and is just marginally fast, it still help competition.
If it comes out to be a world-beater, intel's response might be the real thing to hope for.

If Ryzen is comparable to intel's flagship chip @ $500 less, then intel;s next launch might be a real jump, and something for other's to take note of when it comes time to upgrade.

Like I said in the other Ryzen threads - I will wait until I see real-world performance metrics.

Synthetic benchmarks mean next to nothing to me.  A graph showing a huge performance delta could simply be a millisecond of difference.

29 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I'm not saying it's wrong, just that it's noise.  I'd far rather have a general picture of games people actually play and storage benchmarks and other things that will affect me directly rather than a few nigh useless general purpose benchmarks and some games I don't even care about.

 

I just think it'll be worth the wait just to have reviews from people who put the time and effort into giving you the whole picture.

Here's the 1700X gaming leak. We'll know soon enough.

I've yet to see any REAL numbers to back up all the hype AMD is pushing, thing is they have been full of it in the past and rather not get stung, again, by them 

1 hour ago, Jim K said:

Prices down ... performance up. :) 

 

I hope all the hype is real ... and Intel responds in kind. 

 

Competition is good ...

Must be real as I don't remember seeing this sort of price slashing across the entire Intel's CPU line-up...ever. It certainly isn't a coincidence.

3 hours ago, Brandon H said:

if Ryzen can help drive prices down that's all I really care about in the end :)

intel cpu lineup is going down while amd ryzen cpu is going up!? a far cry from the fx cpu price years ago... amd is now dictating cpu prices...

Just checked newegg. Intel cpus still over-priced as ever.

 

If intel releases this 12 core/24 thread cpu on anything other than a mainstream chipset (z170-z270), its not going to help them.

 

God I hope Ryzen lives up to the hype.....

 

3 hours ago, T3X4S said:

Synthetic benchmarks mean next to nothing to me.  A graph showing a huge performance delta could simply be a millisecond of difference.

Thank you for saying this, it amazes me how many people do not realize this when looking at graphs. They see a huge bar graph, yet the difference is minimal when you check the axis and see what is being compared. I hope this all turns out true, I'd love to run another AMD rig.

  • Like 2
11 hours ago, Yogurth said:

According to various benchmark leaks over the past several days, compiled and analyzed in the video below AMD Ryzen 1700X and 1800X are beating Intel i7 6950X (10/20 CPU that costs over 1700$) in synthetic multithreaded benchmarks. Apparently Intel has no chip in their desktop lineup to counter the Ryzen and some info appeared that they will go for 12 core solution ASAP. It is really crazy how fast AMD's baby seems to be.

 

 

Err Intel were always releasing the 6 core (12 threads) CPUs after Kabylake q3 2017. this has been known for some time buddy, its got diddly squad to do with AMDs Ryzen.

 

Ill wait for real world tests and not ones fabricated by AMD to beef up their retail offerings, they all do it.

 

I hope they are as potent as they claim, competition is good and Intel will step up a gear again.

  • Like 2
3 hours ago, Mando said:

Err Intel were always releasing the 6 core (12 threads) CPUs after Kabylake q3 2017. this has been known for some time buddy, its got diddly squad to do with AMDs Ryzen.

 

Ill wait for real world tests and not ones fabricated by AMD to beef up their retail offerings, they all do it.

 

I hope they are as potent as they claim, competition is good and Intel will step up a gear again.

No not 6 core, 12 core/24 threads in X line  to replace i7 6950X.

http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-review-leak-gaming-overclock-benchmarks/

Things are looking good on that leak.  Not perfect, but good.  I'm still planning to get a 1600X though I think...not sure yet.

 

And I still need to see Tech Reports frame time info and price/perf graph.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!