• 0

Problem With ABC (BitTorrent) Freezing


Question

I have used ABC for over 3 months now, and ever since the beginning, it randomly freezes my PC (including mouse/sound/keyboard etc.) for 5/10 seconds at a time, then everything is back to normal for 5/10 seconds then it freezes again. Only when you close all open programs (Internet Explorer, Outlook Express, MSN Messenger, ABC etc.) does it stop freezing, but then the Internet stops working (i.e. after the first freeze occurs, then no program can access the Internet). Only a restart works. My system/software specifications are below:

ABC v2.6.1 (using the Shad0w's Bittorrent experimental S-5.8.7 core)

Windows XP Professional (SP1)

Asus A7N8X Deluxe (nForce 2)

AMD Athlon XP 2700+

512 MB PC2700 DDR-RAM (DDR333)

Sapphire Atlantis Radeon 9800 Pro (128 MB)

Western Digital 80 GB 7,200 RPMS Special Edition (8 MB Cache) (x2)

Any ideas?

PS. It used to happen when I used to run Shad0w's Bittorrent (before I started to use ABC), so I assume it has something to do with the core (that Shad0w created).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/132840-problem-with-abc-bittorrent-freezing/
Share on other sites

25 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
try azureus client

it doesn't use shadow's core and it has option "slowly connect to new peers" to stop some routers from crashing..might fix your problem

or try offical client.

I uninstalled ABC and installed Azureus_2.0.6.0_setup.exe

When I click on a .torrent file, it downloads the link which should then open the client (Azureus in this case) but it doesn't. Nothing happens. So I went to C:\Program Files\Azureus and double-clicked on Azureus.exe but again, nothing opened/happened. Any ideas?

  • 0
Yeah, if you've had problems with shadow's core in the past then I guess the only solution is to change clients.

But I have tried a different client lol. Azureus is even worse (i.e. it won't even load lol)

  • 0
have you tried the default client? it's at version 3.3 at the moment.

I get really bad speeds with the default client, never above 20 KBs download, even though my connection is a 1MB cable connection (1024/256 : 128 KBs/32 KBs). Something to do with the light in the corner always being yellow, meaning the connection is having problems, probably due to the router. I get no problems (apart from the annoying freezing) with Shad0ws core

  • 0

I managed to get Azureus v2.0.6.0 to work (by installing J2SE 1.4.2) but it started doing the freezing thing! Oh, and Eike's version of the BitTorrent Client can never connect to any tracker. Argh! Am I jinxed?

  • 0

Sounds exactly like the problem I had, random freezing.

My Bit Torrent would D/L for a short bit then the entire PC would freeze, only a reboot would get me back up & running & this happened very frequently.

Do you have a NetGear FA311 Adapter, cause if so then that is exactly your problem (Well, it was mine).

The one that XP installs as default works fine with everything else but it was found that the driver had problems with Bit Torrent.

I currently use Driver FA311 v130, but I believe this was a Beta (Solved my problem anyway), Netgear have now updated their offical driver to version 1.8 (not tested by myself).

Netgear Driver Page

If you wish to try the Beta Driver (Released by Netgear) then give me a shout & I will send it over to you as it fixed my problem. :)

Edited by Midnight Mick
  • 0
I uninstalled ABC and installed Azureus_2.0.6.0_setup.exe

When I click on a .torrent file, it downloads the link which should then open the client (Azureus in this case) but it doesn't. Nothing happens. So I went to C:\Program Files\Azureus and double-clicked on Azureus.exe but again, nothing opened/happened. Any ideas?

Azureus is a java client.

  • 0
Sounds exactly like the problem I had, random freezing.

My Bit Torrent would D/L for a short bit then the entire PC would freeze, only a reboot would get me back up & running & this happened very frequently.

Do you have a NetGear FA311 Adapter, cause if so then that is exactly your problem (Well, it was mine).

The one that XP installs as default works fine with everything else but it was found that the driver had problems with Bit Torrent.

I currently use Driver FA311 v130, but I believe this was a Beta (Solved my problem anyway), Netgear have now updated their offical driver to version 1.8 (not tested by myself).

Netgear Driver Page

If you wish to try the Beta Driver (Released by Netgear) then give me a shout & I will send it over to you as it fixed my problem. :)

Yeah, that's my network card. God I love Neowin lol

Could you send me the working drivers please? Maybe PM me your MSN Messenger address or something?

  • 0

I would advise you to try out the official released drivers from Netgear first.

The ones that I gave a link to.

If they don't fix your problem then Email me via this board an Email address where I could send the Beta drivers to as I do not use Messenger. :)

  • 0
They appear to be working now, although ABC seems to take a lot longer to connect, and the download speeds seem lower too. Oh well

Its lower becasue you have firewall on, just open the ports that you use. ABC and Azureus are both fast and reliable BitTorrent Clients.

  • 0
Its lower becasue you have firewall on, just open the ports that you use. ABC and Azureus are both fast and reliable BitTorrent Clients.

I don't know how. I don't use a software firewall, and I am using a SURFboard SB4100 cable modem with a Linksys Etherfast Cable/DSL Router with 4port 10/100 Switch router

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!