Offloading ReadyBoost/Swap to a USB 2.0 Flashdrive.


Recommended Posts

I have a fairly old laptop that is very unresponsive. It takes forever to login and to start applications. I have done everything else I can think of, within budget, to try to optimize it:

 

Replaced the 5400RPM drive with a 7200RPM one when the original 5400 drive failed (SSD was just too expensive)

 

Upgraded the RAM to 8GB

 

Disabled most of the appearance effects in windows Performance settings

 

Cleared out junk files

 

Defragmented the harddrive

 

Disabled any non-important or non-essential services/apps from startup.

 

But it's responsiveness is still miserable, and I am pretty sure it's the harddrive (defraggler benchmarked it's random read speed at about 3.2MBps, that's pretty low). I was thinking about using a flashdrive for both readyboost, and to put the swap file on, to see if it would help. Issue is, the system doesn't have USB 3.0 ports AFAIK. Would a USB 2.0 drive even help at all? Especially since, due to the intent being that it would stay plugged into the system, I would need one of those nano-sized ones that are barely the size of the USB port itself so it wouldn't accidentally get off. Aren't those even slower than a normal Flashdrive though? Would using a Nano USB 2.0 flashdrive even give any performance difference at all?

Hello,

 

What is the brand and model of the laptop, and what is the brand and model of the hard disk drive?

 

Also, what version of Windows are you running?

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

8 hours ago, TPreston said:

On average flash drive memory will be slower than your HDD so no

For paging it's actually pretty slick.  Not for the actual page file mind you as I don't think Windows allows that and it'd probably thrash the drive, but ReadyBoost can definitely help.

 

Though, if the hard drive is that bad, it'll still take some time to populate the flash drive and do anything involving writes in Windows.

 

As for nano drives I really have no idea.  They probably don't have great perf since they'd need to dissipate heat one way or another.

1 hour ago, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

What is the brand and model of the laptop, and what is the brand and model of the hard disk drive?

 

Also, what version of Windows are you running?

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

The laptop is a Toshiba Satellite C655D. The harddrive is a HGST Travelstar 7K1000 500GB.

 

Windows 10 Home.

Is the HDD new ?

If it is, you should still look for bad sectors.  (HDD Tune)
If all sectors are OK, and no SMART errors, then go into BIOS - see if AHCI is enabled and not IDE.
(You might have to make some registry changes before editing BIOS setting)

If AHCI was enabled, and it doesnt have some weird power setting (like Energy Saver) 

Then possibly a re-install of the OS is needed.
If you re-install the OS, and the problem is still there - your only other option is to try another HDD.

If your original HDD was corrupted, and you simply cloned it over to a new HDD, then you could have cloned the corruption, too.

I recently had to reimage someone's desktop, installed Win10 and it ran horribly.
I was having licensing issues, so I put win7 on it.
Ran just as bad.  Looked in BIOS, it was set to IDE.
Made the necessary changes - all problems went away.

18 minutes ago, Cyber Akuma said:

Yes , it actually replaced the dying original 5400RPM HDD in the system a few months ago. I am PRETTY sure I ran scans on it before using it to make sure.

Like your avatar BTW - the DIMM for cross bones is clever.

Well, if the HDD is good, did you clone the corrupted image directly over to the new drive, or do a clean install on the new HDD ?

You could try doing  sfc/scannow from an elevated cmd prompt...
But, check the IDE settings in BIOS, before you do the sfc/scannow.

Im logging off for the night, but will check back tomorrow if you haven't gotten anywhere.

Good Luck

Hello,

 

From reading up on the now six-year-old Toshiba Satellite C655D-S5300 I see that it contains an AMD E-240 or a E-350 CPU, which were from a series of low-end processors designed for netbooks.  So, even when the system was new, it wasn't a speed demon.  I have some systems with similar processors (2×ThinkPad X100e, X120e, X140e) and I know they certainly work fine even today, so the performance characteristics you reported with the drive seem way out of line to me.

 

My suspicion is that since it was cloned from a failing drive, a problem might have occurred during the cloning process with making a reliable copy of the operating system.


My suggestion would be to download the bootable version of the Hitachi Global Storage Technology's Drive Fitness Test program and use that to run a full battery of diagnostics against the drive and then wipe it completely.  When that's finished, go ahead and do a clean installation of the operating system.

 

If possible, you'll want to use the recovery media that came with (or you made for) the notebook computer to install the operating system, since I recall getting the various drivers installed was something of a pain.  That said, you can find some of the device drivers here on Toshiba's support site, and there may be some newer video drivers here on AMD's support site (look at the bottom of the E Series APU section), as well as updated drivers here on AMD's support site for AHCI, chipset, RAID and USB support.  You'll want to make use of Windows Update to get the operating system and other device drivers updated, as well.

 

Once you've got your installation of Windows updated, go ahead and reinstall your applications and restore your data from your backups, and I think you'll find that old laptop runs a lot better than it has for a long time.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, While ~104 GB of space may seem generous (at least compared to other e-readers which have 8-32GB), I feel at this price point the device should have a Micro SDXC card slot for expansion, particularly if it allows audio books to be installed and played. I hope to see more reviews of 6" phone-sized e-readers on Neowin in the future. It will be interesting to see how they compare. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 by Razvan Serea Run programs in a sandbox to prevent malware from making permanent changes to your PC. Sandboxie allows you to run your browser, or any other program, so that all changes that result from the usage are kept in a sandbox environment, which can then be deleted later. Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32- and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems. It is being developed by David Xanatos since it became open source, before that it was developed by Sophos (which acquired it from Invincea, which acquired it earlier from the original author Ronen Tzur). It creates a sandbox-like isolated operating environment in which applications can be run or installed without permanently modifying the local or mapped drive. An isolated virtual environment allows controlled testing of untrusted programs and web surfing. Sandboxie is available in two flavors Plus and Classic. Both have the same core components, this means they have the same level of security and compatibility. What's different is the user interface the Plus build has a modern Qt based UI which supports all new features that have been added since the project went open source. The Classic build has the old no longer developed MFC based UI, hence it lacks support for modern features, these features can however still be used when manually configured in the Sandboxie.ini. Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 release notes: Added added DisableCustomTitleOpt=[process,][y|n] to allow [#] sandboxie title markers on custom-titlebar windows (Delphi VCL, Qt, Electron) that were previously skipped to prevent DWM repaint CPU loops #5387 Changed updated bundled ImDisk driver to 3.0.2 #5419 Fixed fix Suppress logs for expected non-user SIDs #5422 SbieSvc.exe: SBIE2218/2219 error when run program as administrator #5417 fixed explorer.exe crashes in Application Compartment when Huorong Security is installed #5423 Download: Sandboxie Plus (64-bit) | 23.5 MB (Open Source) Download: Sandboxie Classic (64-bit) | 3.0 MB Links: Sandboxie Website | GitHub | ARM64 | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Christian Maas' XVI32 is a nice (and very small) hex editor. Speaking of hex editors, many years ago a colleague and I who both worked at Tribal Voice managed to edit a copy of the company's PowWow instant messaging client to make it behave better now that all of its lookup servers and other server-side tech was gone.  The program didn't support NAT (RFC-3022 was introduced in January 2001, the same time Tribal Voice was shuttered), but it still worked okay if you manually set up port-forwarding on your router.  The server at http://powwow.jazy.net/ hosts a copy (usual warnings about downloading and running untrusted code from random internet servers apply). I occasionally use some tools like Funduc Software's Search and Replace and Application Mover when I need to make mass-edits to text-based files or move programs with a hard-coded installation directories, respectively.  When I need to figure out the exact LCD panel inside of a laptop, EnTech Taiwan's Monitor Asset Manager is my go-to tool for that purpose. JD Design's website (now hosted on github.io) has a number of interesting freeware and shareware utilities.  I used to use their TouchPro utility to set the file timestamps on software I was mastering to match its version number (e.g., version 3.00 of a program had all of its files dates set to 3:00AM, and so forth). Karenware has a number of interesting freeware utilities, too. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I still use HexChat! Not really as ancient as the 1994 AutoCAD above my post, but I have never found anything better to replace it. Yes we still operate an IRC server https://www.neowin.net/irc/ 😛 
    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!