Recommended Posts

I get slow loading when reading new pages (fine once cache'd)

 

It takes like 5 seconds to load a page. Says "waiting for ***.com". Then after that the page loads up slow. The pictures take an extra 10 seconds to reappear.

 

I know this happening on FireFox as well as Chrome.

 

I tried looking around and they suggested I use Google DNS. So I did so, noticed no difference.

 

I'm on Linux Mint 18.2 (so Budman doesn't get confused again)

 

Is this a fault on my IPS, or? My Dad, on the same network, notices this as well...

 

Any pointers here? If you need more info, ask. (Writing this at 12AM)

 

Edit: I have a fast internet, too. 100/10

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/
Share on other sites

So use the tools the browsers give you in what is taking so long..

 

webdev.thumb.png.62bd909ff6e45e2c7e7a41f681510502.png

 

So we can see exactly what part of the page is taking so long, be it the specific domain does not resolve?  Something else?

 

Maybe its just packet loss on your isp connection?  Your saying your speedtests show 100/10 all the time?  Do a sniff on your machine when you load a page.. We can see if lots of retrans are happening, etc.. Wireshark is your friend...  Yes runs on linux ;)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598139838
Share on other sites

I get 100 on a good day, but, still, net is fast on speedtest.

 

6902395649.png

 

I just thought changing DNS would help as it helped others.

 

 

I did this with gmail:

 

3VReuOI.png

 

Want to help me with wireshark? I never used it before.. (downloaded)

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140112
Share on other sites

Well clearly there is some IPv6 going on there.. I would guess that is your problem..

 

Turn off ipv6 and see if you like your internet better..

 

Also not seeing your full speed pretty anytime you test points to a problem.. If you were a few Mbps what your paying for ok - but your at half of what you should get..

 

Your client is going to try ipv6, then when that doesn't work it will then do ipv4.. So yeah you can see delays on the switch, etc.  If you do not like the performance your getting - turn it off.. Does it work better?

 

edit:  BTW - here is mint forum saying that disable ipv6 fixed their google sites being slow

https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=191127

[SOLVED] All google related sites are REALLY SLOW

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140160
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mindovermaster said:

I tried looking around and they suggested I use Google DNS. So I did so, noticed no difference.

I really dislike when someone just says, "use google dns." Instead, you should benchmark various dns servers and see which one gives you the best performance, for all you know, googles dns could be worse than your isps.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140192
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

I really dislike when someone just says, "use google dns." Instead, you should benchmark various dns servers and see which one gives you the best performance, for all you know, googles dns could be worse than your isps.

Yep, this is a great tool for exactly that..

 

https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140194
Share on other sites

I dislike it when people say benchmark dns and pick the one that are 2 ms different - like that is going to make a difference <rolleyes>.

 

Can you benchmark these dns servers with the domains you use?  And at different times so to test how well the cache is updated after ttl expires by other users on this same forwarder asking for the domain and letting it be cached before I might need it, etc..

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140202
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Well clearly there is some IPv6 going on there.. I would guess that is your problem..

 

Turn off ipv6 and see if you like your internet better..

 

Also not seeing your full speed pretty anytime you test points to a problem.. If you were a few Mbps what your paying for ok - but your at half of what you should get..

 

Your client is going to try ipv6, then when that doesn't work it will then do ipv4.. So yeah you can see delays on the switch, etc.  If you do not like the performance your getting - turn it off.. Does it work better?

 

edit:  BTW - here is mint forum saying that disable ipv6 fixed their google sites being slow

https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=191127

[SOLVED] All google related sites are REALLY SLOW

But IPv6 is set to ignore via network settings... So would that be at my router level, perhaps?

 

Edit: Scratch that... IPv6 is disabled in my router as well.

Edited by Mindovermaster
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140204
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BudMan said:

I dislike it when people say benchmark dns and pick the one that are 2 ms different - like that is going to make a difference <rolleyes>.

I don't believe that is what I said, but on to your point I 100% agree. That is why I question people when they say to switch to google/open dns without validating anything. If the difference is 2ms, obviously switching dns will not solve the issue. I just think, blindly following some forum users advice of "use google dns" is a bad idea.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140208
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Edit: Scratch that... IPv6 is disabled in my router as well.

Simple sniff would show.. I thought that clients6 said v6 on it... I just checked it does have ipv4 address and ipv6 address..  So can not tell for sure from that info..  Take a sniff and post it up so we can see if packet loss, lots of retrans, etc. etc.  How long something takes to respond from when you send syn, etc

 

What I would suggest you do is clear your browser cache, close your browser - start up wireshark.. Then go to some sites you say are slow and some that you say are fast.. And then post that sniff.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140250
Share on other sites

@BudManI'm using WireShark 2.2.6 from my repository. Can you tell me what I'm supposed to do?

 

@CircaflexI'm using an Arris modem. I can't remember which model, but it's on TW's (spectrum) modem list.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140288
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

@BudManI'm using WireShark 2.2.6 from my repository. Can you tell me what I'm supposed to do?

 

@CircaflexI'm using an Arris modem. I can't remember which model, but it's on TW's (spectrum) modem list.

Is it an old modem? Or was it recently replaced? Have you upgraded your speeds since purchasing/leasing said router? Have you ever received your full advertised speeds? Is it possible, your modem is to old to handle the newest speeds? It being on their list really doesn't mean much. Flip it over, grab the model or login to the modem gui and it should give you the model there as well.

 

https://www.lifewire.com/wireshark-tutorial-4143298

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140300
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

Is it an old modem?

Or was it recently replaced?

Have you upgraded your speeds since purchasing/leasing said router?

Have you ever received your full advertised speeds?

Is it possible, your modem is to old to handle the newest speeds? It being on their list really doesn't mean much. Flip it over, grab the model or login to the modem gui and it should give you the model there as well.

No, we just bought it about a year ago. We bought it ourself, as we didn't want to pay $10/month (TimeWarner back then) to rent their modem.

I already see massive speeds. We used to get 17/1. Now it's usually 100/10 (120/11 when on VPN)

I'm not hurdling over my monitors to look at it. 192.168.0.1 doesn't work...

It works fine, don't worry, it can run at the given speed from the ISP.

 

@BudManWhen I start it up I see this:

 

eifAN6F.png

 

Since starting it, I don't see much happening...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140340
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

No, we just bought it about a year ago. We bought it ourself, as we didn't want to pay $10/month (TimeWarner back then) to rent their modem.

I already see massive speeds. We used to get 17/1. Now it's usually 100/10 (120/11 when on VPN)

I'm not hurdling over my monitors to look at it. 192.168.0.1 doesn't work...

It works fine, don't worry, it can run at the given speed from the ISP.

 

@BudManWhen I start it up I see this:

 

eifAN6F.png

 

Since starting it, I don't see much happening...

https://www.lifewire.com/wireshark-tutorial-4143298

https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html/

http://www.linuxandubuntu.com/home/how-to-use-wireshark-to-inspect-network-traffic

https://www.concise-courses.com/security/wireshark-basics/

https://www.howtogeek.com/104278/how-to-use-wireshark-to-capture-filter-and-inspect-packets/

 

7 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

It works fine, don't worry, it can run at the given speed from the ISP.

Clearly that isn't the case, you state you should be getting 100/10, yet your speed results show 54/12. Something is not working as it should... If your dad is noticing this too, on a different device, clearly something is wrong. Whether its your modem, router, or ISP, but something seems to be "off" if it isn't just your device.

 

 

Edited by Circaflex
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140346
Share on other sites

You have to capture on the interface your using... It sees a lot of interfaces there.. Scroll down and pick the interface your on.. Your wired right... So should be like eth0, or rel0 or igb0, etc.. depending on the brand of nic you have.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140348
Share on other sites

I do have wireless on my motherboard, but it is not enabled. So am wired, yes.

 

I cant find eth0, or like anything you said. Has the following:

 

enp0s31f6

any

Loopback

wlp5s0

bluetooth0

nflog

nfqueue

usbmon (different numbers)

 

Unless one of those things refers to my eth0?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140356
Share on other sites

@CircaflexSometimes, it is slower, some days it is higher. Know anything about fluctuation? And that was only ONE scan to ONE server. I just did it once to prove a point.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1351594-slow-loading/#findComment-598140362
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!