Microsoft Kernel Patch CPU Before and After Benchmarks Thread


Recommended Posts

Here is a thread where users can post benchmarks of their CPU before and after the update from Microsft.

 

Intel Core i7 477R CPU 3.20GHz 

Brix Pro

 

Before patch 

 

39488119491_30104f8c4e_b.jpg

 

After

 

25618130438_d94ae4538f_b.jpg

 

Benchmark software 

PerformanceTest

https://www.passmark.com/products/pt.htm

  • Like 3

Not sure why I am getting result that is opposite of what I expected. :/

I am running Windows 10 1709 (16229.192) after patched, downloaded from this link:

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4056892

 

 

 

Lenovo Laptop

 

SuperPi Mod 1.9 WP
==================
Before (1M): 14 seconds
Before (8M): 157 seconds

 

After (1M): 14 seconds
After (8M): 153 seconds


PassMark PerformanceTest (CPU)
==============================
Before: 3797, 3812, 3823 (Average: 3810)
After : 3844, 3837, 3846 (Average: 3842)


Geekbench 4 (CPU)
=================
Before (Single-Core): 3139, 3146, 3146 (Average: 3144)
After  (Single-Core): 3156, 3172, 3188 (Average: 3172)

 

Before (Multi-Core): 5588, 5602, 5574 (Average: 5588)
After  (Multi-Core): 5556, 5556, 5576 (Average: 5563)

 

(I lost the links for before patched)

 

Score link for after patched:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6101200
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6101313
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6101448


Jetstream 1.1
=============
Before: 165.50
After : 164.57

 

 

 

HP Laptop

 

SuperPi Mod 1.9 WP
==================
Before (1M): 9 seconds
Before (8M): 112 seconds

 

After (1M): 9 seconds
After (8M): 112 seconds


PassMark PerformanceTest (CPU)
==============================
Before: 5955, 5961, 5875 (Average: 5930)
After : 6197, 6099, 5797 (Average: 6031)


Geekbench 4 (CPU)
=================
Before (Single-Core): 4668, 4672, 4644 (Average: 4661)
After  (Single-Core): 4661, 4679, 4700 (Average: 4680)

 

Before (Multi-Core): 9209, 9180, 9168 (Average: 9186)
After  (Multi-Core): 8755, 8743, 9275 (Average: 8924)

 

Score link for before patched:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6101071
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6101179
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6101271

 

Score link for after patched:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6102483
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6102564
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6102847


Jetstream 1.1
=============
Before: 264.45
After : 253.10

  • Like 2

Great idea Warwagon:)

 

here is the start of mine 

 

Benchtools used on sig rig @1080p

 

  • Cinebench 4D
  • 3D Mark (Timespy Extreme)
  • Novabench
  • Rog RealBench
  • Passmark

Before Patch 

 

Passmark CPU test BEFORE

image.thumb.png.2a0caaf441a5705f451f4729244e8af9.png

 

Passmark CPU AFTER

image.thumb.png.22faf2114646503b195c9f2f77df1aae.png

 

Cinebench 4D BEFORE

  • CPU Benchmark = 966CB
  • OpenGL Bench = 140 FPS

AFTER

  • CPU Benchmark = 975CB ???
  • OpenGl Bench = 149.95 FPS ???
     

3D Mark timespy extreme BEFORE

  • 3998

AFTER

  • 3997 ????

Novabench 

  • 2713

After

  • 2703
     

RealBench BEFORE

  • Image Editing 212,486/ Time 25.0745
  • Encoding 93,501/time 56.9829
  • OpenCL 113,529/ Ksamples per sec 20877
  • Heavy Multitasking 110,647
  • Time 68.9761
  • System Score 132,540

RealBench AFTER

  • Image Editing 208.830/Time 25.5135
  • Encoding 92,841/time 57.3881
  • OpenCL 113,529/ Ksamples/sec 20922
  • Heavy Multitasking 103,867/Time 73.4779
  • System Score 129,766

 

Overall slightly slower with some benches, Cinema 4D benches.....anyones guess! :p

 

before and after had all the same processes running and apps, what i have noticed however, Asus AI Suite 3 wont run :p

 

btw Webroot Secure anywhere working no problem at all post patch,

  • Like 2

Tried some differnet benchmark software which didn't give the greatest info, but you can see the results.

 

Intel Pentium N3700 1.60GHz

 

Before

 

38793771664_5533e6e52b_b.jpg

 

After

 

38793771734_fb1cd59f13_b.jpg

 

  • Like 2
  On 04/01/2018 at 12:44, alexander3133 said:

Not sure why I am getting result that is opposite of what I expected. :/

 

Expand  

It’s in the realm of measurement accuracy/error. 

  On 04/01/2018 at 18:58, Elliot B. said:

So, no difference.

 

The whole thing was overblown.

Expand  

Maybe for Windows. It’s real in Linux. 

ok 

 

Lenovo X201 Test. (old system)

 

Core i7 ULV M620@2.67ghz

 

Benches used 

  • Cinema4D
  • Passmark

 

Passmark Before 

5a4e8383b9af7_lappypre.thumb.jpg.6024137879040880573249a58fc44833.jpg

 

AFTER 

5a4e958691f73_lappypost.thumb.jpg.259bfe9816feb65a582df57b81d53235.jpg

 

Cinema 4D

CPU = 204cb

OpenGL= 0.78 FPs (LMFAO)

 

AFTER

CPU= 207cb ????

OpenGL= 0.79

 

Hardly thorough benchmarking but both higher than before patch....go figure!

 

I would like to see some benchies submitted with AMD chips for a more rounded dataset tbh.

 

Teacup, meet storm ;) 

 

 

  On 04/01/2018 at 21:36, Mockingbird said:

I installed the update and it turns out that kernel VA shadow is off.

 

No wonder it's not having any performance impact.

Expand  

good info to know mate, thank you.

The reason why older CPUs see a larger performance hit is the absence of PCID. PCID mostly mititgates the performance hit. Not sure how far it goes back (haswell maybe?), but seventh and 8th gen Intel CPUs should not feel the burn.

  On 05/01/2018 at 00:28, adrynalyne said:

The reason why older CPUs see a larger performance hit is the absence of PCID. PCID mostly mititgates the performance hit. Not sure how far it goes back (haswell maybe?), but seventh and 8th gen Intel CPUs should not feel the burn.

Expand  

what about my stellar perf on that X201? 

 

M620 i7 ULV? 

  On 05/01/2018 at 00:35, Mando said:

what about my stellar perf on that X201? 

 

M620 i7 ULV? 

Expand  

Further research and discussion with co-workers on my end  has shown that unless the process/app/whatever is making sys calls, it’s not going to make much of a difference. 

 

 

  On 05/01/2018 at 00:37, adrynalyne said:

Further research and discussion with co-workers on my end  has shown that unless the process/app/whatever is making sys calls, it’s not going to make much of a difference. 

 

 

Expand  

I also read something similar, the performance hit is only when making sys calls, so a VM would potentially have a performance decline, correct?

  On 05/01/2018 at 00:40, Circaflex said:

I also read something similar, the performance hit is only when making sys calls, so a VM would potentially have a performance decline, correct?

Expand  

ill get back to you on that tomms mate, I set up a W10 VM and 2k16 server VM for testing at work before leaving today. On Lenovo X Series hosts running Esxi 6. (12 Xeons per host)

 

corpwide were assessing and deciding if its worth pushing the patch out, Sec dir above us reckons while its a stinker, it doesnt pose any real world threat to our global estate at this point in time. for one the systems need to be compromised before this is even a "thing", games already lost at that point.

  • Like 3
  On 05/01/2018 at 00:40, Circaflex said:

I also read something similar, the performance hit is only when making sys calls, so a VM would potentially have a performance decline, correct?

Expand  

Unknown. I’m way out of my comfort zone with the complexity of this. 

  On 05/01/2018 at 00:43, adrynalyne said:

Unknown. I’m way out of my comfort zone with the complexity of this. 

Expand  

yep, im the same, grasping some of it, but bowing to my Sec teams superior knowledge in this field, im just helping them spread the workload, cos im nice like that (and im whoring myself to Global Corp Sec team for a new role with them from home :P)

 

im sick of going into an office and dealing with retarded end losers directly as well as server/site adm work (which i love!), im getting too old to enjoy juggling multiple roles at a single site, and my boss is an inept A-hole :p but thats another story!

 

might even post a soapbox article on todays events re: NTP settings and synching issues, i was without words when i discovered what had been setup. put it this way, in general Default GPO holds every policy estate wide....no just no!! /faceplant! thats a starter for 10 in what i discovered!

  On 04/01/2018 at 18:28, Mando said:

 

before and after had all the same processes running and apps, what i have noticed however, Asus AI Suite 3 wont run :p

 

Expand  

Im having the same issue with Asus AI Suite 2, were you able to find a fix ?

  On 05/01/2018 at 00:56, jamester64 said:

Im having the same issue with Asus AI Suite 2, were you able to find a fix ?

Expand  

Nah mate, tried reinstalling and no dice. no new version atm either. meantime ive set it all up in bios manually, inc fan tuning.

 

Ive emailed Asus support to notify them of my findings. 

  On 05/01/2018 at 00:58, Mando said:

Nah mate, tried reinstalling and no dice. no new version atm either. meantime ive set it all up in bios manually, inc fan tuning.

 

Ive emailed Asus support to notify them of my findings. 

Expand  

Strange that AsusFanControlService is still running in the background so at least I got that :-) I just cant get the GUI to open :-(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • man i remember hearing about new icons years ago and we still are at this......
    • That's entirely speculation. If he wants these on the road, I would assume (and hope) that he's tested the crap out of these things in real world scenario simulations until he (and any government regulators) are 100% convinced that they are as safe as a human driver before letting them on the streets of a real city. You don't test an automated ton of steel and aluminum with a big engine capable of going up to 200 mph by sticking it a public street with a human behind the wheel "just in case" and hoping for the best.
    • Get a lifetime subscription to AdGuard Family Plan for only $15.97 by Steven Parker Get rid of annoying and intrusive ads and protect your device from malware with this advanced ad blocking app Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can get a lifetime subscription to AdGuard Family Plan for just $15.97. Meet the world's most advanced ad blocker! AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for the best web experience. The software combines the world's most advanced ad blocker, a whole privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This amazing software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent & phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $39.99, that's a saving of $130 (-76%). For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included Use coupon FAMPLAN when checking out to apply additional discount Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Spoken like a truly committed Tesla Fanboi. Somehow everything is Waymo's fault... including Tesla's 10+ years of failed FSD promises, Tesla's Swazticar PR, Tesla's blatant inability to not get their vehicles involved in nationwide recalls, and Tesla drivers' inability to drive cars... yup, sounds like it's all Waymo's fault. Jfc, Waymo's about to map+deploy NYC... Tesla can't even drive down a hill without random midroad hard stops in flat-as-earth Austin... and yet it's Tesla eating Waymo's lunch?! WUT?!?!!
    • We really do live in the dumbest timeline.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Camlann earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      fredss earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      fabioc earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      GoForma earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      GoForma earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      649
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      224
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      220
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      144
    5. 5
      Xenon
      136
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!