Can't get a bad Certificate out of the system & browsers


Recommended Posts

Hello Gentlemen,

 

I am running into an issue where all the browsers, and the system itself, have an incorrect certificate for my site
(https://www.thejuicegrinder.com), with Chrome reporting ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID because it has a certificate stored for my mail servers for some reason when I enter the URL.

It has the bad certificate somewhere in the system, because if I try to access it programatically via vb.net I get a SSL error too.
 

I have cleared the cache in Chrome, Edge, etc. I have cleared SSL state, etc. etc. etc.
All the stuff that Googling suggests, I have done.

Of course, going to the site on other machines or a VM there is no problem.

 

Does anyone have any suggestions? I'm stumped.

You need to get a new certificate or a wildcard certificate that uses the right common name, if you did you may just need to replace the certificate being served for the domain server side with the proper one as it is probably sharing the mail certificate by default.  Or if you do have a certificate that does have the proper common name you need to insure it is tied to be served from that domain.  As it is showing as invalid for other machines too:

 

https://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html#hostname=https://www.thejuicegrinder.com

 

Certificate Issues:

https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.thejuicegrinder.com&s=23.254.129.10&latest

 

Or you may need to 

ITops;

 

TL;DR first reply.

That's what I cannot figure out - the certificate is properly installed in IIS, I have no idea why there is an issue.

You see that, but LOL, it works fine on other machines?

 

Your first link shows an issue, then the 2nd one says it's fine.


I'm totally confused - the cert people said it was fine, that shows it isn't, it don't work on my machine but does on others.

Edited by Mr. Black

For the site that SSL is binded to the IP of the site and the mail cert binded to the to others?  If so restart IIS and do a fresh openssl cert test from your host to see what is going on.

 

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-server-2012-R2-and-2012/cc732443(v=ws.11)

 

In a worst case scenerio remove all the certificates and re-add them after restarting IIS.  More then likely something could be binded to it in memory.  If that doesn't work restart the physical server (Windows Fix).

I'm not sure where the issue arose, but I changed IIS to "Use All Unassigned" and the issue stopped.
I also added Use Server Name Identification.
 

Was working fine before, so...
Doesn't matter, I'm transferring servers and will have enough IP's for them to truly be dedicated to one purpose (i.e. current is shared)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!