Ghost image vs. Format + Re-install...


  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. Ghost image vs. Format + Re-install...

    • Man, I'll Ghost Image the damn thing
      9
    • Meh... I'll reload everything
      16


Recommended Posts

I made an image of my HDD right after i installed windows and got everything working just right...

It takes less than 7min to do the ghost, which does all of the following..

- Formats

- Installs Windows Again

I really like it, because i just have to tell it where the image is, and it does the rest... I do not have to stand around and type in ****. So thats what i would suggest

making IMages is a LOT better than formatting specially when you have settings galore and color settings registry tweaks/hacks all that **** that you'd forget to do again if you did format that along with all the programs you may have installed etc. but i guess a good format is good every once in a while

Ghosting is much better if you had to do what I did last year. Our company is contracted to the bigest steel producer in Africa and they requested a complete change from 386/486 and Pentium1/2 up to P3's running Windows 2000. Now all the PC's were already loaded with Windows 2000 when we received them but they needed to have updates and security settings done as well as Office 2000, Antivirus package and various programs installed. So doing something like 3000 installs was going to be much easier with a ghost.

So for about 2 months I was doing installs on a few hundred PC's. The image sure did help as it only took about 10 minutes per PC. Now to load the whole lot would have been around 2 hours per PC. Work out the difference and multiply that by 3000 and you get the idea on what a time saver it is.

But for a single user I guess formatting and installing once in a blue moon is not gonna be much of a problem. I wanted to image after my last format but never got round to it. Best is do as many updates as possible to the OS. Install must have software then tweak and then finally make an image. That way it is at it's best setup so that you can bugger it all up without a worry.

"Ghosting" is basically creating a copy or "image" of your harddrive which you can use to restore your system with later in case of failure as an example. The benefit of this is its fast, around 10 mins on average as opposed to an hour or two to reinstall manually and then your apps and favorite tweaks.

This image can be burned to cd and can be used as many times and on as many systems as you like. It is an exact copy, so it will restore everything, your apps, settings, and your OS.

Visit www.norton.com and see if they have a trial version of Norton Ghost on offer for download.

Greetz

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure why anyone would want to use Chrome on Android when there are far better browsers that let you disable ads. I personally use Vivaldi and never see ads by default. Am I right in thinking you can't block ads on Chrome for Android?
    • Same time next month y'all, when we see this 💩posted again?
    • I mean, it's not like they did something like force you to have U2's "Songs of Innocence" on your computer with no way to remove it... *coughcough*
    • Going to quote myself from a comment I made to a related article: It's not about the OS, it's about the workflow. OS fans consistently miss this. People have work to do and they've invested a lot of time, effort and even money building their workflows. It's expensive to change, so that change has to offer real benefits that compensate for the cost of updating workflow and sorry, Win 11 just doesn't. Win 11 breaks workflow in weird and pointless ways seemingly either to dumb down the OS (with the same results as we saw when MSFT tried to dumb down Office's menuing system with "SmartMenus") or make it look more like macOS. MSFT seems to have completely lost the basics of UI/UX like FITS and muscle memory in Win 11. If they had made these optional - then sure, but they aren't. That's the same reason most users won't just jump to an entirely new OS - which has an even bigger workflow cost - until there's just no other option. Not only is there the core workflow cost, but the cost of finding new parallel software for the new OS, transferring and possible converting files and dealing with incompatibilities and then redeveloping workflows. It's just not as simple as "switch". And now there IS another option, stay on Win 10 for another year and pray for Win 12 (much as Win 7 users did with Win 8 - which happened when Win 10 came out).
    • At least that album was really good. I don't know if F1 was $200 million well spent yet...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Mentor
      The Werewolf went up a rank
      Mentor
    • First Post
      Myriachan earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      615
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      227
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      166
    5. 5
      Som
      148
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!