Backing up DVD / blu ray & CD collection?


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, DevTech said:

Well, he has done some of those things.

 

1. He has done a direct copy RIP.

 

2. He has viewed the DVD in "native" form and found it lacking (as we suspected would happen).

 

3. Which allowed him to discover that the PS4 upscaling circuit was the "secret sauce" in why he didn't perceive DVD to be low quality.

 

4. Which to me means the next step given that he has 500 DVDs is to figure out how to upscale them in a sophisticated manner (i.e. not direct pixel multiplication) and be happy with the reult before anything else proceeds because:

 

5. Forget MKV/MP4 etc compressed formats for now as a Red Herring, if he can't get a direct original copy to be acceptable!

 

 

Another user asked the question.  Bud man and I answered the question.  

 

That being said, PLEX will upscale     But it won’t be Blu-ray quality, it will be slightly better than dvd quality. It will be tolerable. 

1 minute ago, sc302 said:

Another user asked the question.  Bud man and I answered the question.  

 

That being said, PLEX will upscale     But it won’t be Blu-ray quality, it will be slightly better than dvd quality. It will be tolerable. 

Don't want to be annoying but there is "simple upscale" and then there is "extremely sophisticated upscale" which I tried to show with a photo in the previous post about mosquito artifacts.

 

So I don't have a PS4, but Sony does have a reputation in their DVD/BluRay Players for quality upscaling (in their "pro and pro-sumer" models) so the PS4 might have something leaning into the "extremely sophisticated upscale" category.

 

So where is PLEX on that range and he needs to view it and be happy it is as good as PS4 before he goes any further or it is all a waste of time...

 

Or he could rent a BluRay copy of each of his DVDs and RIP those which in theory should be legal since he already owns the IP rights to those movies when he bought the DVDs... He would just need to find his local Blockbuster... Oh wait...

 

 

 

Exactly which is why he needs to take his DVD and pull it off with makemkv and then watch it with plex or dlna on his tv plex app (if possible) via firestick, ps4,  and see if the quality is good enough..

 

Seems he wants to get rid of ps4 so prob not an option.  I would check with quality of tv app or firestick..

 

If quality is good enough for him, then we can move forward and discuss should he compress or not compress what container is best.  Maybe his player does not like mkv for direct play?  And his current box or future box will have to transcode it on the fly or he will want to use say mp4 with ??? as the actual media for best direct play results

3 hours ago, BudMan said:

What did you hear that mp4 is smaller than mkv?  That is just nonsense - they are containers not the actual media... What the video or audio bit rate and codex will determine its size etc..  Now are you saying the media in the container is exactly the same?  MKV does have more features that mp4 and supports more - if there is a file size difference its got to be insignificant a few bytes..  With the same exact media inside the container..

Just what I heard from a group in FB. Someone said something along, "Why do you have MKV? MP4 is a smaller file." 

 

I don't really care, as I have MKV, MP4, AVI in my DVD Storage.

 

Just something I heard. I see now that my logic is incorrect. :blush:

47 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Exactly which is why he needs to take his DVD and pull it off with makemkv and then watch it with plex or dlna on his tv plex app (if possible) via firestick, ps4,  and see if the quality is good enough..

 

Seems he wants to get rid of ps4 so prob not an option.  I would check with quality of tv app or firestick..

 

If quality is good enough for him, then we can move forward and discuss should he compress or not compress what container is best.  Maybe his player does not like mkv for direct play?  And his current box or future box will have to transcode it on the fly or he will want to use say mp4 with ??? as the actual media for best direct play results

But he said that he already viewed his copy he made and the quality was worse.

I have done some searching and upscale of DVDs to HD is a big giant cluster-xxxx mess.

 

1. Some eyeballs can't see any difference no matter what

 

2. Some people just want annoying black bars to go away and don't mind a pixelated mess if it fills the screen

 

3. Some people think they know tech and post this insanely stupid pronouncement usually very condescendingly:

 

""I don't understand why you bother to do this - upscaling cannot improve the quality of the picture as you cannot add new pixels that didn't exist in the original image."

 

I can't believe how many times I've seen posts similar to that one...

 

4. The noise level is insane, everyone is clueless, all the posts are old from the "DVD era" and false info is everywhere and I want to scream just a little bit...

 

5. I suspect there is a license/patent issue like Dolby because High End Players and High End TVs have specialized chips that handle DVD upscaling very well

 

6. I still haven't located any equivalent PC software to these hardware chips, but just did a "survey" type search so far...

 

 

Some maybe informative links.

 

First software I found that seems to understand the issues:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DScaler

 

Upscaling is part of "Video Post Processing"

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_post-processing

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deblocking_filter

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_denoising

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinterlacing

 

Top Ten Most Misunderstood Things About the DVD Format:

 

http://www.lafcpug.org/Tutorials/basic_dvd_extraction.html

 

Before and after pictures (not real time)

 

G Smart DeInterlace

http://www.nattress.com/Products/FinalTouch/FTGSmartDeint.htm

 

Another before and after with more explanations of conversion issues:

 

Compressor 4: Convert SD to HD

https://larryjordan.com/articles/compressor-up-res/

 

"Here’s the final result. The up-scaled image is on the left, the original, enlarged image is on the right. Even when I reduced the size of these images for this article, there is a significant improvement in image quality when converting from SD to HD using Compressor — look at the detail in the beard, in the fabric of his coat, and the skin texture in the image on the left. The difference is stunnngly apparent when viewed at full HD resolution."

 

 

compressor.thumb.jpg.e962d65f029ad942e09566f59e011bd0.jpg

 

 

 

 

So my conclusion so far is that software like PLEX (and I have also looked at UMS, KODI, and Media Portal) will use MPlayer or something based on libffmpeg to do a decode, then de-interlace, then frame rate convert from 24 fps to 60 fps, and pixel scale from SD to HD and then apply a simple soften filter.

 

It seems to me that to get the same processing that high-end TV's have in their specialized chips will require some darned smart shader code in the GPU to do this real time 60 times a second.

 

There is an OSS GPU based codec that I previously linked to (how many pages back?) that might do some good - I will look at the docs to see how it might be tested.

 

And that is why PLEX does need a little bit of power behind it esp if you have multiple streams going at the same time.  Single stream might be OK with a RPI but I have not tried it on one.  I used to use a PC for that duty as my main pc never powered off due to different testing that I do during the day when I am at work, however I rarely ever have to utilize that any more and it goes to sleep often.  

 

However, as I stated, what I find acceptable and good quality may not be what you find to be acceptable and good quality.  

5 hours ago, DevTech said:

4. Which to me means the next step given that he has 500 DVDs is to figure out how to upscale them in a sophisticated manner

 

 

No not really.

 

See a Lambo is nice, a Ferrari is nice, an Aston is nice  ... but i'm perfectly happy driving my everyday 17 year old family car.

 

I said i noticed the difference the PS4 was making and that it is better than watching the DVD without the upscaling however it doesn't make the DVD suddenly unwatchable or painful to watch. I'm not about to run out and buy Blu-Rays of all my DVDs and if upscaling once ripped is a headache in itself then it's probably something i wont bother with.

 

Also the reason i haven't yet pointed Plex at my rip (or one of the reasons really) is because i wanted to have Plex on the TV directly as it'd be easier. I'm not impatient enough to be unable to wait to see if that's possible. Plugging the Amazon Firestick in is a faff in itself. I know you wont understand that but without photos or a video showing you then you simply wont understand, and i prefer not to leave it plugged in anyway so you'll just have to trust me that if i could've done it without the Firestick then i would've.

 

As it stands...

 

1949800212_Photo27-11-201863224pm.thumb.png.04224a8db719ebd2eb013c02ccab9d1c.png

 

It turns out the TV route isn't an option but as i mentioned in a previous post - i update the thread with this then others who may have the same TV series as me will at least know the situation.

Well use DLNA then - does your TV support DLNA..

 

If you can not plug in the firestick then get a fire cube or an apple tv... or hdmi extension cable to plug the firestick with..

 

What apps does this TV support?  My little tv in the kitchen the roku stick could be seen out the side of the TV so I got a 90 degree adapter adapter.. Problem solved for like $1

 

edit: Ok just looked it was 6$ for a 4 pack.. 2 at 90, and 2 at 270... I one of them on the wall jack for the hdmi line in the kitchen so the cable didn't stick straight out, etc.. They are very useful little adapters for just such an issue.

I would get a stick and leave it plugged in, if the firestick works get one and leave it in or get a roku stick or cast from your phone/tablet if you tv supports casting.  

 

If you decide to purchase another streaming player/smart device, they are pretty cheap.  The roku ultra is pretty sweet, albeit expensive.    The roku app is great and works with all current devices.  

The reason is not so much the stick as that's a piece of ssip to put in the TV. It's the mains for it. Due to where the extension lead has to be located and the other plugs in and about it it's an absolute PITA plugging the damn thing in. I'd have to extension out of the extension lead and it just starts getting messy.

 

As for DLNA, that's one of them words i've seen in this thread where my eyes have just glazed over and i've wondered what you guys are saying 😂

 

And for the apps, they're pretty crappy actually. I'll try remember to get a photo later and show you.

6 minutes ago, sc302 said:

I would get a stick and leave it plugged in, if the firestick works get one and leave it in or get a roku stick or cast from your phone/tablet if you tv supports casting.  

 

If you decide to purchase another streaming player/smart device, they are pretty cheap.  The roku ultra is pretty sweet, albeit expensive.    The roku app is great and works with all current devices.  

I prefer not to leave stuff plugged in if they're not going to be used for a while. It's just something i've always done. The stick/mains plug get warm and i dunno i just prefer it to not be in if it's not being used much. Not sure why, just habit.

 

The stick i have is the Amazon FireStick but not the Alexa one, it's the one before that.

Mains for what - they can be powered by USB port.. Are you saying this TV doesn't have USB port either?

 

You do know if there is a term used that you do not understand - there is this thing called google ;)  Where you can lookup up more than you could ever want to know about the acronym being used or for that matter just ask..

 

In a nutshell its a way for your device (tv) to find something that can stream the media to it (plex server)

^ exactly... Then they not on when your TV not on.. Solve both your complaints..

 

I don't like it that way and plug it into the wall for juice because I like it to be on when the tv turns on, not having to wait for it to boot, etc.  But if you don't have power handy they are designed to be run that way..

 

You know another amazing thing they sell is extension cords and power strips for when you need more plugs in in a location but no actual wall plugs there :)

We had our Roku stick plugged into our power strip. When in sleep mode, aka not running, it runs less than 1 cent an YEAR... (I don't know exact cost, but somewhere around there)

But they get warm don't you know..

 

I could plug one of mine into my killawatt meter and get you an exact cost for idle for 24 hours.  Are we taking bets on how many kwh it uses in a 24 hour period?  I will do it when I get home ;)

5 minutes ago, BudMan said:

But they get warm don't you know..

 

I could plug one of mine into my killawatt meter and get you an exact cost for idle for 24 hours.  Are we taking bets on how many kwh it uses in a 24 hour period?  I will do it when I get home ;)

They get hot when used, not on idle. AFAIK.

 

It doesn't draw THAT much electricity. I swear, you could have a little solar panel on it...

do you have a file sharing option on one of the screens...I believe that is how you envoke the dlna.

 

 

fyi the "Apps Market" is the apps store...if you didn't before, you could search there for PLEX (probably not there though).  You could also search for a dlna player.  

 

There is nothing stating that there is an "Apps Market" in any literature so I couldn't point you there.

This is why you should just use a stick or a box or get a roku tv or fire tv, etc.. These tv makers have zero care for what apps they support or even updating them once they put on one there, etc..

 

I say test it with the fire stick you have... If looks ok then you can get a fire box or decide what other streamer appliance you want - shield tv maybe even...

 

They call the tv smart because it has netflick and amazon and oh wow youtube ;)

 

Your not going to have any sort of idea what your media is going to look like till you actually see it on your TV... We can discuss tech of upscaling and picture quality until the end of days... But until you actually put the picture on your screen your not going to know anything..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!