Recommended Posts

I have 6 files that absolutely will not delete...

 

every file is 0KB, if you try to rename them it says could not find this item this is no longer located in {x} verify the items location and try again..

 

if you try to delete them in explorer you get the same message...

 

go to command prompt same message...

 

boot in windows pe and do it in that command line same message....

 

I've tried 3rd party tools no luck.

 

It's almost like the MFT table record was made but no actual file and now it's just confused?

 

Reformatting the drive of course fixes the problem... but the program that makes them keeps randomly making them (it's a file transfer utility) when doing a temp file for storage while the transfer is in progress..

 

Check disk doesn't help.....

 

any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1383854-cant-delete-0-byte-file-windows-10/
Share on other sites

it's an annoying NTFS bug. I've run into it more than once myself since the XP days.

it's supposedly a rare bug though so if it's happening consistently like you say then I'd report it to the program owner of the file-transfer tool.

 

Usually the above suggestion from Eternal Tempest will solve it but I have had the rare occasion where I ended up having to format the drive to get rid of a glitched entry.

  On 17/06/2019 at 12:29, softwaretested said:
  • Make sure the apps associated with those files are not running. You might need to check Task Manager to look at the running processes there. 
  • Try deleting in Safe Mode. 
  • Close all Windows Explorer processes (via Task Manager). 
  • Or use an app. 
Expand  

I don't think you read this thread first :P

 

  On 17/06/2019 at 13:02, CrashGordon said:

I'd look into finding a file transfer utility that didn't cause this issue in the first place.

Expand  

it's system we can't ditch... it's a data feed from a company we deal with that sends EDI files.. this isn't just some FTP client, it's their requirement we use this specific system

  On 17/06/2019 at 13:09, Laser said:

Unlocker usually works on these types of files

 

https://unlocker.en.softonic.com/

Expand  

nope, doesn't work

 

I can't even get them to delete from a linux USB boot 

I'll add this, we did NOT have this issue until we went to server 2016 and windows 10... now it's all the time

  On 15/06/2019 at 03:21, bledd said:

Do this.

 

Open CMD in an elevated mode (right click, run as admin)

 

If the file is in..

 

C:\Users\USERNAME\Documents\filename.wtf

 

del "\\?\C:\Users\USERNAME\Documents\filename.wtf"

 

 

 

 

One of those stupid Windows filesystem bugs.

Expand  

doesn't work either

you can try malwarebytes fileassassin https://www.malwarebytes.com/fileassassin/

 

Usually a third party tool, utilizing a apple mac, or linux would be able to delete those files.  

 

can't you utilize robocopy to copy/transfer your files/folders, it is very fast and pretty easy to use.

  • 4 weeks later...
  On 11/07/2019 at 19:52, neufuse said:

yep returns no errors

Expand  

Have you checked the smart data with something like crystal disk info? Maybe the smart data will show a current pending sector .. maybe it's sitting on data right there?

Create a blank directory and use robocopy to overwrite whatever directory you're having issues with. 

 

  Quote

Create a blank folder somewhere, for example:



 

C:\Blank_Folder\

 

Now lets say all of the junk you want to delete is located here:

D:\Keep\Keep\DESTROY\****\***.... etc .etc ..etc...

 

You're going to use robocopy to Copy that blank folder over top of the DESTROY folder... with /E for subfolders and files... with the /MIR switch which will purge anything that is not in the source (there is nothing... its a blank source)

robocopy c:\Blank_Folder\ D:\Keep\Keep\DESTROY\ /E /MIR
Expand  

 

Make sure you don't get source and destination confused and back up any files you actually need.
 

  • 11 months later...

still having this issue...... if you try to do anything to these zero byte files it says they can't be found by ANY applications that try to delete them

 

it's almost like NTFS's MFT table has a link but the link points no where

the exact error message is 

 

Could not find this item

 

This is no longer located in {path}. Verify the item's location and try again.

  On 20/06/2020 at 13:24, neufuse said:

still having this issue...... if you try to do anything to these zero byte files it says they can't be found by ANY applications that try to delete them

 

it's almost like NTFS's MFT table has a link but the link points no where

the exact error message is 

 

Could not find this item

 

This is no longer located in {path}. Verify the item's location and try again.

Expand  

Did you ever try Linux? 

  On 20/06/2020 at 13:31, adrynalyne said:

Did you ever try Linux? 

Expand  

same thing it's like the file isn't there but there is a record to it in the MTF table

  On 20/06/2020 at 13:38, LostCat said:

I had this happen before with a file (twice iirc) and somewhere around 3/4 or 4/5 of file unlock tools wouldn't get rid of it.  I wish I remembered what worked o.o

 

Try Lockhunter?

Expand  

same issue, says path doesn't exist, and lock hunter says nothing is locking the file

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This super-powerful GaN charger with four ports is 50% off by Taras Buria Some time ago, I reviewed the Cuktech 10, a powerful 100W GaN charger with three ports. It left positive impressions, and since then, it has served me as my primary charger for my phone, watch, laptop, and tablet. Recently, Cuktech offered me the opportunity to take a look at the model 15, a more powerful 140W GaN charger, this time, with four ports. Right now, this powerful charger is available with a massive discount at just $50.99 (with coupon applied). The Cuktech 15 is the same as the Cuktech 10, just slightly bigger, more powerful, and with one extra port. It has a light metallic finish, but overall, it retains the brand's identity and features. The four ports are well spaced out, and the black plastic insert with a cyan rim has a ribbed texture for better grips. Although I live in Europe, Cuktech sent me a US variant with a retractable plug. Okay, I guess. The ability to retract the plug makes it extra portable, which is nice. A high-power 240W five-foot cable is also included. The charger measures 3.11 x 2.56 x 1.26 inches and weighs 0.737 lbs. The Cuktech 15 has four ports: two high-power Type-C ports, one Type-C port with a lower output, and one Type-A port. The first two Type-C ports can deliver a full 140W in single-port mode (PD 3.1 supported), which is nice—no asterisk or caveats here with combined power or something. If you need the full 140W for one device, you get it. Ports are capable of working in the following modes: Single-port Type-C1 / C2: 140W max 5V 2A, 5V 3A, 9V 3A, 11V 6.1A, 12V 3A, 15V 3A, 20V 5A, 28V 5A Type-C3: 33W max 5V 2A, 5V 2.4A, 9V 2A, 12V 1.5A, 11V 3A Type-A: 18W max 5V 2A, 5V 3A, 9V 2A, 12V 1.5A Multi-Port Type-C1 + C2: 100W + 33W or 65W + 65W Type-C1/C2 + Type-C3: 100W + 33W Type-C1/C2 + Type-A: 100W + 18W Type-C1 + Type-C2 + Type-C3: 65W + 60W + 7.5W or 45W + 45W + 18W Type-C1 + Type-C2 + Type-C3 + Type-A: 65W + 60W + 7.5W As you can see, the charger is pretty robust, and it can power two pretty powerful laptops at once and even have enough oomph to charge a smartphone, albeit at a lower power. Another thing worth mentioning is that the Cuktech 15 delivers "clean" power with pretty low pulsations at about 25-50 mV. The rule of thumb is that the lower the pulsations, the better the charger is for your device's battery health. In this area, Cuktech's charger does not disappoint, and they deliver way better results than 100 mV, which is considered a standard for a good charger. Cuktech uses gallium nitride technology, which enables smaller, more powerful and efficient charging. Speaking of efficiency, the charger is rated for 78% average or 64% at a 10% load. When charging at 120W, I received an average of 80-85%, which is good. Of course, when charging at peak power, it gets hot, but not too much. The Cuktech 15 140W usually costs $99.99, which is undoubtedly not cheap. However, right now, you can get it for half the price, which is a very good deal, considering you get a high-quality charger with plenty of ports and very high power output. Like with the Cuktech 10, you cannot go wrong with this one. CUKTECH 15 140W four-port GaN charger - $50.99 | 30% off + a 20% off coupon As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Awesome book, just hope they don't screw up Rocky and the story
    • KDE's KClock is getting Wayland Picture-In-Picture support by David Uzondu The KClock app for KDE Plasma over the years has received a number of updates, like better integration with KRunner and a dedicated background service (kclockd) for managing alarms. Now, it looks like KDE devs want to add something cool: pop-out timers using the new Picture-in-Picture protocol for Wayland. Image: Kai Uwe Broulik This all started from a simple observation. Kai Uwe Broulik, a KDE developer, saw someone using a small timer window during a presentation and thought it was a good idea. The problem is that achieving this kind of "always on top" behavior is handled differently between the old X11 display server and the newer Wayland. With X11, an application could pretty much do whatever it wanted. If a program wanted to draw a drop-down menu, it would just create a borderless window, place it in a specific spot, and grab all user input. Wayland operates on a different philosophy. As Broulik notes, under Wayland, the application describes what it wants, and the compositor gets to decide how to handle it. A drop-down menu is an XDG Popup. The application tells the compositor which button spawned it, and the compositor handles the placement and behavior. This is much more secure and consistent. It also means an application cannot just decide to keep its window on top of everything else. This restriction prevents a web browser from implementing an overlay video player under Wayland. To get around this in a standardized way, a proper Wayland support model for Picture-in-Picture, or PiP, was needed. Enter the xx-pip-v1 protocol. It is a new protocol designed specifically for creating floating PiP windows, and KWin, Plasma's compositor, recently gained support for it. Because it is an experimental protocol, its use is gated behind an environment variable, KWIN_WAYLAND_SUPPORT_XX_PIP_V1. A new protocol is fine for demos, but it needs a real application to find its weaknesses. So Broulik implemented it in KClock. This work allows KClock to offer pop-out timers and even a pop-out stopwatch in a small PiP window. The user could get system-wide options to control where the PiP window appears, or if it appears at all, and have that setting apply to every single application that uses the protocol. You can check out the merge request on GitLab for more technical details about this feature.
    • Nothing of course; it is just a classic syndrome of MAGA pathology.
    • They use it to assessment's in the UK already. Have a friend who said they basically feed response's and prompt during assessment's for many mental health conditions now (essentially tick boxes these days enough ticks and you got it) the AI can prompt questions to ask if its unsure how to score something. It's really good at recognising fractures and broken bones also.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      TIGOSS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      henryj earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      CarolynHelen earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      henryj earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      196
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      163
    4. 4
      Xenon
      81
    5. 5
      Som
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!