Recommended Posts

So just like the title says, is it alright to use a single email address for everything even if it's your real name in it? BUT you have unique passwords for all your accounts, using a password manager so you're maxing out the character lengths, changing passwords regularly for accounts you deems important (financial, personal etc) and using 2FA (software token or sms if that's the only option). And are careful to not be a dumb human and click "shiny" emails that look legit?

 

What do you think? I'm sure my spam emails would increase but that's pretty easy to mitigate now a days. I'm just getting tired of having so many email addresses to manage. Especially for an entire family. What are your thoughts and recommendations? Thanks.

2 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

You can always use ThunderBird... To have all your emails in one place...

I've used Thunderbird, Outlook, Windows 10 Mail. I'm just frustrated and tired of managing different email accounts...what for is my question?

12 minutes ago, thisdude said:

I've used Thunderbird, Outlook, Windows 10 Mail. I'm just frustrated and tired of managing different email accounts...what for is my question?

Oh, OK. You never mentioned that. ;)

 

I'm out of ideas then...

I don't advise merging them together due to the spam. I have a throw away address just for that stuff to dump into. If you just have to then how about setting up forwarding for all the various accounts you get so you only have to deal with one address?

20 hours ago, Gotenks98 said:

I don't advise merging them together due to the spam. I have a throw away address just for that stuff to dump into. If you just have to then how about setting up forwarding for all the various accounts you get so you only have to deal with one address?

Yeah but that's what the Spam folder is for no? And I think most of the mainstream email services are pretty good at catching spam today. 

I've only used one address for years, and any spam I actually do get is directed to the spam folder automatically. The problem I run into is the constant slew of news letters and coupons from legit business I gave that email too, usually though a quick unsubscribe click solves that problem. I also use Outlook for its focused inbox feature.

 

Managing multiple email address takes just as much as it does to manage a single email address.

 

 

For personal email I have just used a gmail for quite some time.. If gmail decided to just blow away all the email - there would be a lot of F'd people ;)

 

I do own a domain that I have used for recovery email, etc.  But I do not use this for any sort of normal email.. But since I own the domain, I can always control where email for domain goes and can point that anywhere I need too, etc.  No matter what..

 

But I have gotten lazy over the years and when I sign up for something I just use my gmail. I do use +something addresses that gmail supports for websites - this can help in finding where spam comes from when they use [email protected] as the address.

 

If your serious about just wanting to use single email address you might want to look to owning your own domain.. You can then create any [email protected] you want and send it to where you want.. And as long as you own the domain you can control where email goes.. So no company could just close up shop and cause you pain because your email no longer works.

 

 

Something to keep in mind...  If you are looking to cut down on spam in general, you can always use timebombed email services like 10minutemail.com and the like when u sign up for one-time stuff but don't want to deal with the hassle of spam.  🙂

  • Like 2
On 6/29/2019 at 8:44 AM, shockz said:

I've only used one address for years, and any spam I actually do get is directed to the spam folder automatically. The problem I run into is the constant slew of news letters and coupons from legit business I gave that email too, usually though a quick unsubscribe click solves that problem. I also use Outlook for its focused inbox feature.

 

Managing multiple email address takes just as much as it does to manage a single email address.

 

 

Yeah that's kind of what I'm imagining would happen with just using a single email. So what if spammers get a hold of it. Spam filters are very good today compared to 5, 10 years ago.

20 hours ago, BudMan said:

For personal email I have just used a gmail for quite some time.. If gmail decided to just blow away all the email - there would be a lot of F'd people ;)

 

I do own a domain that I have used for recovery email, etc.  But I do not use this for any sort of normal email.. But since I own the domain, I can always control where email for domain goes and can point that anywhere I need too, etc.  No matter what..

 

But I have gotten lazy over the years and when I sign up for something I just use my gmail. I do use +something addresses that gmail supports for websites - this can help in finding where spam comes from when they use [email protected] as the address.

 

If your serious about just wanting to use single email address you might want to look to owning your own domain.. You can then create any [email protected] you want and send it to where you want.. And as long as you own the domain you can control where email goes.. So no company could just close up shop and cause you pain because your email no longer works.

 

 

I'm not really concerned about any of the majors closing up shop. But if they did I'm sure I'd have plenty of time to transfer emails and switch to another provider. Even when Yahoo email got bought out everyone had plenty of notice to switch and yet Yahoo email is still running. 

 

My biggest concern is just simplifying down to one email to relieve my stress and just wasted time managing multiple email accounts.

 

I've thought about having my own domain to have my own email addresses. However, that would again be another thing to maintain and pay for. I like the idea but don't want to spend time managing it.

20 hours ago, The Rev said:

Something to keep in mind...  If you are looking to cut down on spam in general, you can always use timebombed email services like 10minutemail.com and the like when u sign up for one-time stuff but don't want to deal with the hassle of spam.  🙂

I've used 10minutemail before, very helpful indeed! Great for one off sign ups.

IMO, you should have 2 emails.  One for sign ups and just utter crap where you don't want to receive advertisements, understand that rules have been a thing since the inception of email...if you choose to find that out or not was on your own accord.  Some people have 3 or 4 emails, keeping personal emails personal not intermingling them.  

 

While it may be tiresome to maintain accounts, only 2 or 3 should be constant....the advert one should only be when you sign up for garbage.

1 minute ago, sc302 said:

IMO, you should have 2 emails.  One for sign ups and just utter crap where you don't want to receive advertisements, understand that rules have been a thing since the inception of email...if you choose to find that out or not was on your own accord.  Some people have 3 or 4 emails, keeping personal emails personal not intermingling them.  

 

While it may be tiresome to maintain accounts, only 2 or 3 should be constant....the advert one should only be when you sign up for garbage.

I get that and that's been a mainstay for a long time now. But is it really necessary now with how great spam filters how. Outlook has that great focused feature to help put important emails upfront. Gmail has several tabs to funnel email into.  And I'm starting to think so what if ad companies have my "batman" email? All they are going to do is sell it to other companies that will send more spam that will go directly into my spam folder. Am I being naive?

Just now, thisdude said:

I get that and that's been a mainstay for a long time now. But is it really necessary now with how great spam filters how. Outlook has that great focused feature to help put important emails upfront. Gmail has several tabs to funnel email into.  And I'm starting to think so what if ad companies have my "batman" email? All they are going to do is sell it to other companies that will send more spam that will go directly into my spam folder. Am I being naive?

spam filters aren't that great.  

3 minutes ago, sc302 said:

spam filters aren't that great.  

Are they bad enough to have to sign up for a separate email address that requires you to maintain? I'm not so sure unless it's some shady site you don't want sending email to your single email address. I mean marketing emails from Kohls, GameStop etc aren't so bad and spam filters can easily be trained to always remember to move them to spam right?

those are the easy ones.....

 

it is your email and how you wish to go about treating it.  I know a bit about it, I deal with it every day.  They are far from perfect and capturing the bad stuff properly.  Kohl's, etc and legitimate emails are easy....they are legitimate and will essentially come from only a hand full of sources....they might be annoying, but they are far from the spam that I think of.  What I think of, and am exposed to, is a bit more malicious.

 

Here is a sample of what my users get daily from what seems (to the untrained eye) to be the CEO

Quote

 

Are you available? I am in a meeting and I need to send some gift cards to a client today. I need you to go to any store nearby to get some Google Play gift cards for me. Can you handle this?

 

Thanks. 

 

No spam rules or filters are grabbing that no matter how many times I report this type of email.  I ended up creating a mail server rule to block the message if the Name in the email is the CEO's...his name is kind of unique so it is possible for me to do that....but if it were John Smith, it would be much harder.

On 6/29/2019 at 8:44 AM, shockz said:

I've only used one address for years, and any spam I actually do get is directed to the spam folder automatically. The problem I run into is the constant slew of news letters and coupons from legit business I gave that email too, usually though a quick unsubscribe click solves that problem. I also use Outlook for its focused inbox feature.

 

Managing multiple email address takes just as much as it does to manage a single email address.

 

 

Yeah Outlook has come a long way. And that focused tab is very nice. 

 

Yeah if you’ve had an email since the AOL days there’s no way you can’t have been on some DB leaks or spam list by now. 

14 minutes ago, sc302 said:

those are the easy ones.....

 

it is your email and how you wish to go about treating it.  I know a bit about it, I deal with it every day.  They are far from perfect and capturing the bad stuff properly.  Kohl's, etc and legitimate emails are easy....they are legitimate and will essentially come from only a hand full of sources....they might be annoying, but they are far from the spam that I think of.  What I think of, and am exposed to, is a bit more malicious.

 

Here is a sample of what my users get daily from what seems (to the untrained eye) to be the CEO

No spam rules or filters are grabbing that no matter how many times I report this type of email.  I ended up creating a mail server rule to block the message if the Name in the email is the CEO's...his name is kind of unique so it is possible for me to do that....but if it were John Smith, it would be much harder.

Yeah these basic phishing emails can work really well on the less tech savvy for sure! I work for a big company that has a pretty great on going spam campaign and it'll send out similar ones that are relevant to the work and culture of our company and they regular hook people. 

 

I've got an old school Gmail account, more than one, back when they were only sending invites only. So I regularly get warnings about my account having a password reset, or some clever phishing emails that I'm sure are designed to get access to them. So I totally understand this. But this does happen to everyone no matter what email strategy they use I think. It takes very low effort to mass spam, phish and spear phish people now a days. 

 

But again I'm burnt out on managing multiple email addresses, across different services, switching them around and creating new ones...ugh! I'm thinking that just using a single email for everything, using a password manager with maxed out character length password, 2FA enabled where you can and that's it. Besides exposing myself to more spam/phishing/DB leaks (DB leaks are unavoidable and inevitable I think) do you see any issues with my thinking? 

I wouldn't  want to take the risk of only using 1 email for everything especially when important  things like banking are involved, also don't  forget sites often ask for a different email account for account recovery, its pretty silly to only use 1 in my opinion.

 

There is no maintaining time for more than 1 email account if you collect your email from the same place.

 

 

18 hours ago, SnoopZ said:

I wouldn't  want to take the risk of only using 1 email for everything especially when important  things like banking are involved, also don't  forget sites often ask for a different email account for account recovery, its pretty silly to only use 1 in my opinion.

 

There is no maintaining time for more than 1 email account if you collect your email from the same place.

 

 

How would it be risky using the same email for everything even banking? I mean if the password was weak and not regularly changed, 2FA isn’t enabled yeah I can see that. I’m just curious because I want to see the holes in my thinking here. Again I’m not really concerned about spam or my email ending up on a DB leak because that’s unavoidable (simplest and least harmful is a family member or friend having your contact info and them sending you email, calling, or having an app installed that grabs it) in today’s age. Especially the DB hack/leaks.  Thanks

In my opinion I wouldn't just have 1 email, as already pointed out there is no more time/hassle managing more than 1, just use an email app.

 

But I think you have made your mind up what you want to do and nothing we say will change your mind.

On 7/2/2019 at 1:57 PM, SnoopZ said:

In my opinion I wouldn't just have 1 email, as already pointed out there is no more time/hassle managing more than 1, just use an email app.

 

But I think you have made your mind up what you want to do and nothing we say will change your mind.

I just haven't heard any great arguments other than spam as a reason to have more than one email address.

 

No I haven't totally made up my mind. I'm just not so sure that the old strategy of having more than one email is really needed anymore.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
    • If you have an account with any of Meta's services, you technically have an account with all of their services. You may not use it, but it exists.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!