Parental controls enabled on the router for a specific computer but the rules do nothing


Recommended Posts

My niece has a nasty habit of wanting to sleep all day and stay up all night, her dad decided to enable the parental controls on the router (Linksys EAB300) and restrict the internet to cut off at after a specified time. However this does not happen, neither does the block certain websites. Is this something related to the router itself? The connected PC is connected via Ethernet and shows up on the network map.

would not surprise me if it was a bug in the firmware.

 

you could try installing OpenWRT to see if that works better. shouldn't be an issue reverting back if you need either with linksys routers (Y)

 

https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/firewall/fw3_configurations/fw3_parent_controls

After a quick Google search ... it seems that you need to disable IPV6 on the router.

 

Another option, depending on the device, why not enable those parental controls...or I don't know...grounding the kid.  :) 

  On 27/09/2019 at 13:16, Brandon H said:

would not surprise me if it was a bug in the firmware.

 

you could try installing OpenWRT to see if that works better. shouldn't be an issue reverting back if you need either with linksys routers (Y)

 

https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/firewall/fw3_configurations/fw3_parent_controls

Expand  

I will mention this to him, see what he thinks. Thanks!

  On 27/09/2019 at 13:20, Jim K said:

After a quick Google search ... it seems that you need to disable IPV6 on the router.

 

Another option, depending on the device, why not enable those parental controls...or I don't know...grounding the kid.  :) 

Expand  

So is there any reason to enable/disable IPV6? Other device I suspect you mean the desktop? Yeah it Windows 10, and I will look into enabling the controls on the system. As for grounding the kid, trust me, if she were my child this would not be an issue at all, but her dad is lazy and doesn't want to be a parent.

  On 27/09/2019 at 13:20, Jim K said:

After a quick Google search ... it seems that you need to disable IPV6 on the router.

 

Another option, depending on the device, why not enable those parental controls...or I don't know...grounding the kid.  :) 

Expand  

that is a bad limitation on the linksys firmware if the parental controls don't effect IPV6 traffic ....

another reason to go OpenWRT with the LuCi webUI; it should be able to apply the rules on all interfaces :)

 

  On 27/09/2019 at 14:57, jnelsoninjax said:

So is there any reason to enable/disable IPV6? Other device I suspect you mean the desktop? Yeah it Windows 10, and I will look into enabling the controls on the system. As for grounding the kid, trust me, if she were my child this would not be an issue at all, but her dad is lazy and doesn't want to be a parent.

Expand  

disabling IPV6 won't hurt anything in most cases but it honestly shouldn't be needed.

 

and yes he means the parental controls in the Windows Control Panel on the desktop itself; that I'd leave as a backup option as depending on how persistent the kid is that would be easier to circumvent than router level blocing.

  On 27/09/2019 at 15:02, Brandon H said:

it honestly shouldn't be needed.

Expand  

It isn't needed, ipv6 has no actual need currently..  And yeah it can be a bit of a pain to curtail from a security point of view. Unless you have the skill set and tools to properly manage it.. The simple solution is to just disable it.. And should be done at the router and the desktop - since what happens if the user just smart enough to turn it back on via the desktop..

  • 3 weeks later...

So lets get some specifics of what your trying to block exactly and how.. What specific site are you trying to block? 

 

Also problem with schedules other then just turning off wifi completely at a specific time is if the states are not flushed on the schedule.. If they went to say www.domain.com before the time to be off hit, then the state has been created already.  And if the control does not kill that state - then they would still be allowed.

 

Does the schedule prevent any new connections?

  On 18/10/2019 at 11:10, BudMan said:

So lets get some specifics of what your trying to block exactly and how.. What specific site are you trying to block? 

 

Also problem with schedules other then just turning off wifi completely at a specific time is if the states are not flushed on the schedule.. If they went to say www.domain.com before the time to be off hit, then the state has been created already.  And if the control does not kill that state - then they would still be allowed.

 

Does the schedule prevent any new connections?

Expand  

Not trying to block sites, trying to disable internet access at certain times.

  On 27/09/2019 at 12:58, jnelsoninjax said:

neither does the block certain websites

Expand  

But you stated you tried both..

 

Ok so your just trying to do a schedule thing at say 9pm no internet for client xyz...   After the time of cut off, try going to something you are sure have not gone to before..  If new stuff is blocked - but old stuff still works its most likely just states are not being killed.. If you can go to stuff that your sure client has never gone to before, then it just not working at all.

While it may prevent Internet access, I'm not sure that this is the way forward if the plan is to prevent her staying up all night. As an example, I have a couple of TB worth of music, tv, films and games. Even if someone cuts my Internet access I have days of material to work with.

 

If he wants his daughter to go to bed at a reasonable hour the best idea is to impose a restriction like, "no phones or laptops in the bedroom."

 

EDIT: Actually, I think we've had this discussion before. In which case that means the last attempt didn't work, I'm not sure implementing the "no internet access" will have an affect either. If the father is annoyed by the behaviour the only thing for him to do is step up and set some ground rules.

  On 18/10/2019 at 11:19, BudMan said:

But you stated you tried both..

 

Ok so your just trying to do a schedule thing at say 9pm no internet for client xyz...   After the time of cut off, try going to something you are sure have not gone to before..  If new stuff is blocked - but old stuff still works its most likely just states are not being killed.. If you can go to stuff that your sure client has never gone to before, then it just not working at all.

Expand  

I tried the website blocking when the time did not work. I will try again this evening when the schedule is set to run, I am assuming that just because time X is reached and the computer is still actively accessing the internet (Netflix, YouTube, etc) it will not just stop because the time is reached. Is this a correct assumption?

  On 18/10/2019 at 11:47, Nick H. said:

While it may prevent Internet access, I'm not sure that this is the way forward if the plan is to prevent her staying up all night. As an example, I have a couple of TB worth of music, tv, films and games. Even if someone cuts my Internet access I have days of material to work with.

 

If he wants his daughter to go to bed at a reasonable hour the best idea is to impose a restriction like, "no phones or laptops in the bedroom."

 

EDIT: Actually, I think we've had this discussion before. In which case that means the last attempt didn't work, I'm not sure implementing the "no internet access" will have an affect either. If the father is annoyed by the behaviour the only thing for him to do is step up and set some ground rules.

Expand  

You are correct, Nick, daddy needs to grow up and make his baby be more responsible, but I suspect that it will not happen, and at this point anything I try to say/do is pointless.

  On 18/10/2019 at 12:25, jnelsoninjax said:

the computer is still actively accessing the internet (Netflix, YouTube, etc) it will not just stop because the time is reached. Is this a correct assumption?

Expand  

Yeah the only way for active stuff to be killed is for that the router to kill all active states/sessions when the schedule kicks off - unlikely that some soho 20$ shitbox does that ;)

yep, I blame the firmware which is why I recommended trying to install openWRT on it to see if that helps before jumping to a new device :)

 

it tends to be hit or miss with the advanced features on consumer routers with the OEM firmware

 

edit: I have a Linksys WRT1900AC router so I can tell you from experience some things just don't work properly in their default firmware. OpenWRT allows me to do SO MUCH more with it.

  On 18/10/2019 at 13:24, Brandon H said:

OpenWRT allows me to do SO MUCH more with it.

Expand  

Yup 3rd party firmware is really the only way to get these things to do more than get you connected... I doubt they do any sort of testing of their so called "advanced" features ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Scientists explain how bigger does not mean better for electric vehicles during colds by Sayan Sen Image by Blomst via Pixabay A new study by Cornell University researchers, working with Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit (TCAT), has found that electric buses use a lot more energy in cold weather, especially in places like Ithaca, where the roads are hilly and winters can be harsh. TCAT started testing seven battery-electric buses (BEBs) in 2021 as part of a pilot program funded by a federal grant. Over two years, the buses ran on 41 different routes in Tompkins County.However,t the buses had issues during colder months, with lower driving range and performance. To understand why, researchers looked at real-world data and developed what they called “Optimal Temperature Zone” (OTZ) models—these models show how much energy the buses would have used in ideal temperatures between 16°C and 30°C. When temperatures dropped to between −4°C and 0°C, the buses used about 48.0% more energy, including both power used to drive and energy regenerated through braking, compared to OTZ predictions. Even in the wider range of −12°C to 10°C, energy use still jumped by 28.6%. Half of this extra energy went into heating the batteries themselves. These bus batteries work best at about 24°C, so when it’s cold, they need extra power to warm up before the bus can even get moving. The other major factor was the cabin’s heating system, especially on urban routes where doors open and close often, letting in cold air. “With an all-electric vehicle, the battery is the only onboard energy source,” said Max Zhang, senior author of the study and a professor at Cornell. “Everything has to come from it.” The study also found that regenerative braking—the process that lets the battery recharge a bit while the bus slows down—didn’t work as well in cold conditions. One reason is that these bus batteries are huge, about eight times bigger than typical electric car batteries, and it’s harder to keep the temperature even across all the battery cells. To improve the buses' performance in winter, the researchers suggested a few short-term fixes: parking them indoors to keep them warmer, charging batteries while they’re still warm, and reducing the length of time the doors stay open during stops. On a bigger scale, cities might need to rethink their transit infrastructure. That includes checking how many charging stations they have, whether buses can be kept in heated garages, and how to adjust routes and schedules. “You have to try to optimize the schedule of all of the buses and to consider the capability of your infrastructure – how many charging stations you have, and if you have your own garage,” said lead author and PhD student Jintao Gu. The team found that rural routes, which have fewer stops, use less extra energy in cold weather than urban ones. That could help transit agencies decide which routes are better for electric buses during colder months. “One of the lessons we’ve learned is that these buses should be designed for the whole country, including states with colder climates,” said Zhang. “But any lessons are good lessons. This helps us learn as a society and do better.” Source: Cornell University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • Appears to be 150W PSU (Core Ultra 9) so most power delivery ports wouldn't even support it.
    • I wasn't implying people should be forced to use a single launcher. I prefer user choice. If Windows includes a decent game launcher, great, people might choose to use it if they want to. If it sucks, no one will use it. I would be completely against anyone being forced in that direction, just like I am against being forced to use 3rd party launchers if I choose to use Steam.
    • Sounds good, but that'd require Microsoft to develop and API of some sort and then get all the developers to support it... but everyone knows that while others will support Microsoft, Microsoft won't support itself and will kill off the feature... again. Microsoft has tried this trick in Windows 9x era, they tried it with the games library in Vista, they tried a big push for Games for Windows Live, and then again in Windows 8 with the WPA apps via their mobile/windows phone eco system. Now they're trying it again, and it's lets not forget that this isn't a push to make PC gaming better. It's not. To do that they need to provide at least the same level of quality and feature set of Steam, otherwise why else are gamers going to not use Steam. Right now Xbox app and everything Microsoft centric around the PC gaming front is exclusively for their new Xbox brand push to make everything an Xbox. Your Toaster, your cat, your PC, your VR headset, everything is a Xbox and that'll last for this generation of Xbox now probably. Then, like Microsoft always has done and will do, they'll drop it like a hot potato and everyone will be left crying. Point in case, bringing Xbox games to the ROG handheld, their entire point of this... They're marketing it as if it's an Xbox console in a handheld, yet, it's not. There are going to be Xbox gamers who think, they'll be able to pickup their Xbox one games and play them on a handheld like Nintendo and Steam Deck users... except they're going to quickly find out that their Xbox game library is almost entirely missing or games they've already purchased on the Xbox need to be purchased again on the 'this is an Xbox' handheld.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tesla maxwell earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      Camlann earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      fredss earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      fabioc earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      GoForma earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      637
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      224
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      219
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      142
    5. 5
      Xenon
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!