Is it worth upgrading my build to an i7-9700K from i5-9600K?


Recommended Posts

I mean the benchmark makes it look like an obvious no-brainer https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-9600K/4030vs4031

 

My build is the following:

 

Be Quiet Pure Base 500 Tower

Be Quiet! STRAIGHT POWER 11 550W Gold 80Plus

Aorus Z390 Pro WiFi

Intel i5-9600K

32GB DDR4 G.Skill Ripjaw PC3200

KFA2 RTX 2070 SUPER NVIDIA

2x M.2 (Samsung 970 EVO 250GB / Windows) (Intel 660p 1TB)

6TB Toshiba X300

 

I game on a Samsung CRG49 (Quake Champions @ 5120x1440) with FreeSync turned on at 100Hz (10bpc in Nvidia settings) and there's no noticeable lag, it looks great actually because the game supports widescreen 😛 But I can probably get the i7-9700K for around €300 (used) which is making me think about it, store price is still around €400 and up.

13 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

I mean the benchmark makes it look like an obvious no-brainer https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-9600K/4030vs4031

Don't know what you mean there.

 

It's a marginal +5% effective speed improvement at the cost of €300-400.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

I don't think so, unless you are getting down on performance. You can always go with a 2080 Super.

 

But if gaming/video-editing, is not a problem, well, not needed.

For just gaming ... nope.

For everyday use ... nope.

 

Instead of using userbenchmark ... I would suggest reading reviews of the 9700k/9600k from various tech sites.  Look at their benchmarks and determine if the cost difference is worth it to you.  Even on eBay ... it seems to be around 80-100 bucks difference between selling the 9600k and buying a pre-owned 9700k.  Speaking of buying a pre-owned CPU, well that in and of itself brings a degree of uncertainty (is it *really* a 9700k or some fake/is the used CPU any good/has it been put through the ringer/warranty/etc)...especially the lower the price.  If you know what I mean.  To eliminate that risk .. you'd be looking about a 200 dollar difference (buying a new 9700k and selling the 9600k).  That is still a "nope", IMO.

7 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Userbenchmark is a joke.

 

 

As Jim said, look at several benchmarks, not just one. Gives you a wider idea.

Thanks guys.. I might max out this board later this year with an i9-9900K if those prices come down, seems it would be better to wait for that 😛 

  • Like 2

You just pre-empted my suggestion of the 9900, not worth the leap for the performance difference! In day to day you probably wouldnt notice much of a difference at all.

 

Intel will have new chips out this year so grab a 9900k once the new chips are out for a discount :) 

Like mentioned in the first reply... it's clearly not worth it. too much $ for not all that much real world performance gain. save the $ and put it towards future upgrades when you will get a solid performance bump for a reasonable price. it's pretty much all about bang-for-the-buck (or thereabouts) if you ask me as I can't see spending tons of $ on hardware when you can get something fast enough for a fraction the cost.

 

but in general... any decent hardware in fairly recent memory tends to last easily for several years before any real need for a upgrade. like with Intel CPU's... if you got at least a decent i5 range, your easily good enough for years to come as I can't see upgrading to a i7 being worth it overall.

 

p.s. hell, I still have a i3-2120, which I got in May 2012 (CPU is released in Feb 2011 I think), and I am going to try to milk that as far as I can as this way when I do upgrade (say in maybe 2-3+ years), ill get a rather large performance increase for minimal $.

Edited by ThaCrip
3 hours ago, Steven P. said:

Thanks guys.. I might max out this board later this year with an i9-9900K if those prices come down, seems it would be better to wait for that 😛 

 

3 hours ago, forster said:

You just pre-empted my suggestion of the 9900, not worth the leap for the performance difference! In day to day you probably wouldnt notice much of a difference at all.

 

Intel will have new chips out this year so grab a 9900k once the new chips are out for a discount :) 

 

Intel don't cut prices.

 

That's why Core i7-7700K is still >$300 today.

32 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Intel don't cut prices.

If you say so, a 9700k is just over 300, which is much cheaper than when it first released. In the UK anyway. 9900k is 440, its expensive but not as much as they were at release - obviously YMMV.

 

Personally my latest rig is a Ryzen system, my last intel was a 4770k 5 years ago, it still performs like a champ but I wanted a Team Red system on the DDR4 platform. Its sweet!

40 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Intel releases new processors that are cheaper, but it doesn't cut prices of existing processors.

17 minutes ago, forster said:

If you say so, a 9700k is just over 300, which is much cheaper than when it first released. In the UK anyway. 9900k is 440, its expensive but not as much as they were at release - obviously YMMV.

 

Personally my latest rig is a Ryzen system, my last intel was a 4770k 5 years ago, it still performs like a champ but I wanted a Team Red system on the DDR4 platform. Its sweet!

Hmm...

 

PCPartPicker Part List

CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K 3.6 GHz 8-Core Processor  ($394.89 @ B&H) 
Total: $394.89
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-02-01 16:16 EST-0500

Just now, Mockingbird said:

Hmm...

 

PCPartPicker Part List

CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K 3.6 GHz 8-Core Processor  ($394.89 @ B&H) 
Total: $394.89
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-02-01 16:16 EST-0500

Like I said... your mileage may vary - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Intel-BX80684I79700K-I7-9700K-3-60GHZ-SKT1151-Noir/dp/B07HHN6KBZ

 

I'm not trying to catch you out dude. Prices vary from region to region, god forbid anyone is trying to build a PC in Australia, Id have to remortgage my house :) 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Yes they tend to hold their price far better than other components, but they do come down..

 

ANYWAY my decision has been made, instead of a CPU upgrade I ordered an NVIDIA Shield (2019) because I am fed up of constant streaming issues with Plex on my Xbox One X, which even Microsoft Devs have confirmed as a bug multiple times but they keep pushing new builds that break it. From one evening to the next after my Xbox seemingly updated I can no longer stream 1080p content without it buffering every 5 mins. My setup is fine, the Plex app on Xbox isn't. 

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, forster said:

Like I said... your mileage may vary - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Intel-BX80684I79700K-I7-9700K-3-60GHZ-SKT1151-Noir/dp/B07HHN6KBZ

 

I'm not trying to catch you out dude. Prices vary from region to region, god forbid anyone is trying to build a PC in Australia, Id have to remortgage my house :) 

With prices like that, no wonder that AMD is outselling Intel by 6:1

4 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Yes they tend to hold their price far better than other components, but they do come down..

 

ANYWAY my decision has been made, instead of a CPU upgrade I ordered an NVIDIA Shield (2019) because I am fed up of constant streaming issues with Plex on my Xbox One X, which even Microsoft Devs have confirmed as a bug multiple times but they keep pushing new builds that break it. From one evening to the next after my Xbox seemingly updated I can no longer stream 1080p content without it buffering every 5 mins. My setup is fine, the Plex app on Xbox isn't. 

Nice, Id love a shield - I run a Plex server on my WD PR4100 NAS, and client on my Apple TV and it's rock solid. If I had a shield I'd stock it full of emulators and roms and make it be my retro gaming bizztch :) 

4 minutes ago, forster said:

Nice, Id love a shield - I run a Plex server on my WD PR4100 NAS, and client on my Apple TV and it's rock solid. If I had a shield I'd stock it full of emulators and roms and make it be my retro gaming bizztch :) 

Yeah I am looking forward to just being able to throw content at it, Plex on Xbox is rubbish, the settings menu crashes and can only be recovered by force quitting the app and the reopening it, so that along with all the streaming bugs is doing my head in.

 

My TV is actually an Android TV but the Plex app on that does not pass through Dolby Atmos/digital properly to my receiver so I can't even default to using that.

 

I'm also going to do this for my Xbox One S upstairs in my bedroom, since that trick works for non HDR content (no good for the Xbox One X 4K setup).

 

Copying for reference:

  • Install Kodi on your Xbox One
  • Launch Kodi, goto addons; search for Plex and install Plex
  • Run Plex Addon
  • In Plex settings enable X265
  • In Plex settings set remote quality to original
  • Set Plex addon to run at Kodi startup.
20 hours ago, Steven P. said:

Yes they tend to hold their price far better than other components, but they do come down..

 

ANYWAY my decision has been made, instead of a CPU upgrade I ordered an NVIDIA Shield (2019) because I am fed up of constant streaming issues with Plex on my Xbox One X, which even Microsoft Devs have confirmed as a bug multiple times but they keep pushing new builds that break it. From one evening to the next after my Xbox seemingly updated I can no longer stream 1080p content without it buffering every 5 mins. My setup is fine, the Plex app on Xbox isn't. 

You'll love it, its own built in plex server is nice and smooth. I rarely watch terrestrial tv anymore I just stream everything :)

 

 oh and while it's still free in beta, geforce stream gaming is way way better than stadia too!

4 hours ago, Daniel F. said:

You'll love it, its own built in plex server is nice and smooth. I rarely watch terrestrial tv anymore I just stream everything :)

 

 oh and while it's still free in beta, geforce stream gaming is way way better than stadia too!

Yeah I just signed up to it, will have a look at it tomorrow :) 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.1 stable launch looms as Linus Torvalds releases the final release candidate by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds has just released what’s expected to be the final release candidate of Linux 7.1, rc7. The Linux founder said that this RC is not small, but smaller than recent releases, which is a good sign because he expects the stable version to drop next week if things continue on this trajectory. Linux kernels see a merge window for the first two weeks of their life, where developers add new features, then there are about seven or eight weeks of release candidates before the stable version. Typically, there are seven release candidates, but if more time is needed, then an eighth release candidate is released too. This week’s RC’s biggest area of fixes was for GPUs, with networking just behind. Torvalds said that the rest of the release was “pretty random and spread out” with some architecture fixes, driver fixes, filesystem improvements, and build fixes for more unusual configs. In terms of specific pieces of hardware receiving improvements in this update, we had more AMD Zen6 models supported and fixes for AMD SDMA 7.1 and GFX11. Hardware that got improvements includes Lenovo laptops, HONOR laptops, and MSI laptops. Here are the changelogs for those: ASoC: amd: acp: Add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15ASH11 Input: atkbd - add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Air 14 (83QK) Input: atkbd - skip deactivate for HONOR BCC-N's internal keyboard ASoC: amd: yc: Add MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG to quirk table ASoC: amd: yc: Enable internal mic on MSI Bravo 17 C7VF When the stable Linux 7.1 is released, it will be up to distribution maintainers, such as Canonical and Red Hat, to release the update to their users via the update manager. Some versions of Linux will get it before others, and some will never get it at all. Fedora and Arch-based distros will be among the first to get it, though. If you don’t get it, the security fixes will be backported to your system’s kernel, so you won’t be at risk, but you won’t get newer hardware support, which is fine if your computer works now.
    • Ideally, the algorithm is smart enough to see the real sender ID and non-spoofed address to block it. Ideally.
    • Helium Browser 0.13.1.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.1.1 changelog: Helium Windows e13ddd4 update: helium 0.13.1.1 (#285) 77ee94b helium/windows: winsparkle updater (built-in auto-update support on Windows) e501e98 helium/windows: refresh updater patches for m149 008faee helium/win: move versioning patches to separate file e114701 helium/updater: implement system install update notifications c9e3cda helium/winsparkle: verboser errors b8f787c helium/windows: more version migrations cd376ed ci: sign update helper with different description 5d2383a build: wire up winsparkle envs 3ff28ff helium/updater: init ca58f6f helium/change-branding: use helium version in more internal places 75b2625 .gitignore: add resources/generated abe78f2 downloads: add winsparkle dep 4ed4429 build: build mini_installer again fabf8e9 update: helium 0.13.1.1 Helium-Chromium 5bf45fed merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.53 (#1857) 3bbe6a3c revision: reset to 1 e3525bb6 helium/zen: reorder patch hunks d48bc496 deps: update ublock to 1.71.0 (#1875) d4e58802 helium/ui: redesign infobar, optimize and rename zen (#1868) c20175cf helium/ui/infobar: redesign, draw proper borders, fix webview relations e8a1bfc1 helium/zen: rename Zen to Frameless in UI, remove feature gates bf560c6a helium/layout: optimize zen top reveal, move out of experiment dir 34ef5f26 patches/brave/chrome-importer: remove os_crypt-related dead code 99cef46c helium/ui: clean up patches, fix accidental string OS gates 5b7dd06c devutils/i18n: add clean command (#1869) 7a32267e helium/updater: add win scaffolding, tighten arch conditions (#1866) d856d800 ci: complete cirrus port to github actions (#1867) c362740d patches: update for chromium 149.0.7827.53 b8a66095 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.53 a3a5471d Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.53 c6a41202 helium/updates: decouple update url from helium services + reformat (#1827) 94344c47 Update to Chromium 148.0.7778.215 95f6fe1c Port CirrusCI jobs to github actions (#3776) Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!