Is it worth upgrading my build to an i7-9700K from i5-9600K?


Recommended Posts

I mean the benchmark makes it look like an obvious no-brainer https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-9600K/4030vs4031

 

My build is the following:

 

Be Quiet Pure Base 500 Tower

Be Quiet! STRAIGHT POWER 11 550W Gold 80Plus

Aorus Z390 Pro WiFi

Intel i5-9600K

32GB DDR4 G.Skill Ripjaw PC3200

KFA2 RTX 2070 SUPER NVIDIA

2x M.2 (Samsung 970 EVO 250GB / Windows) (Intel 660p 1TB)

6TB Toshiba X300

 

I game on a Samsung CRG49 (Quake Champions @ 5120x1440) with FreeSync turned on at 100Hz (10bpc in Nvidia settings) and there's no noticeable lag, it looks great actually because the game supports widescreen 😛 But I can probably get the i7-9700K for around €300 (used) which is making me think about it, store price is still around €400 and up.

13 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

I mean the benchmark makes it look like an obvious no-brainer https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-9600K/4030vs4031

Don't know what you mean there.

 

It's a marginal +5% effective speed improvement at the cost of €300-400.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

I don't think so, unless you are getting down on performance. You can always go with a 2080 Super.

 

But if gaming/video-editing, is not a problem, well, not needed.

For just gaming ... nope.

For everyday use ... nope.

 

Instead of using userbenchmark ... I would suggest reading reviews of the 9700k/9600k from various tech sites.  Look at their benchmarks and determine if the cost difference is worth it to you.  Even on eBay ... it seems to be around 80-100 bucks difference between selling the 9600k and buying a pre-owned 9700k.  Speaking of buying a pre-owned CPU, well that in and of itself brings a degree of uncertainty (is it *really* a 9700k or some fake/is the used CPU any good/has it been put through the ringer/warranty/etc)...especially the lower the price.  If you know what I mean.  To eliminate that risk .. you'd be looking about a 200 dollar difference (buying a new 9700k and selling the 9600k).  That is still a "nope", IMO.

7 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Userbenchmark is a joke.

 

 

As Jim said, look at several benchmarks, not just one. Gives you a wider idea.

Thanks guys.. I might max out this board later this year with an i9-9900K if those prices come down, seems it would be better to wait for that 😛 

  • Like 2

You just pre-empted my suggestion of the 9900, not worth the leap for the performance difference! In day to day you probably wouldnt notice much of a difference at all.

 

Intel will have new chips out this year so grab a 9900k once the new chips are out for a discount :) 

Like mentioned in the first reply... it's clearly not worth it. too much $ for not all that much real world performance gain. save the $ and put it towards future upgrades when you will get a solid performance bump for a reasonable price. it's pretty much all about bang-for-the-buck (or thereabouts) if you ask me as I can't see spending tons of $ on hardware when you can get something fast enough for a fraction the cost.

 

but in general... any decent hardware in fairly recent memory tends to last easily for several years before any real need for a upgrade. like with Intel CPU's... if you got at least a decent i5 range, your easily good enough for years to come as I can't see upgrading to a i7 being worth it overall.

 

p.s. hell, I still have a i3-2120, which I got in May 2012 (CPU is released in Feb 2011 I think), and I am going to try to milk that as far as I can as this way when I do upgrade (say in maybe 2-3+ years), ill get a rather large performance increase for minimal $.

Edited by ThaCrip
3 hours ago, Steven P. said:

Thanks guys.. I might max out this board later this year with an i9-9900K if those prices come down, seems it would be better to wait for that 😛 

 

3 hours ago, forster said:

You just pre-empted my suggestion of the 9900, not worth the leap for the performance difference! In day to day you probably wouldnt notice much of a difference at all.

 

Intel will have new chips out this year so grab a 9900k once the new chips are out for a discount :) 

 

Intel don't cut prices.

 

That's why Core i7-7700K is still >$300 today.

32 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Intel don't cut prices.

If you say so, a 9700k is just over 300, which is much cheaper than when it first released. In the UK anyway. 9900k is 440, its expensive but not as much as they were at release - obviously YMMV.

 

Personally my latest rig is a Ryzen system, my last intel was a 4770k 5 years ago, it still performs like a champ but I wanted a Team Red system on the DDR4 platform. Its sweet!

40 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Intel releases new processors that are cheaper, but it doesn't cut prices of existing processors.

17 minutes ago, forster said:

If you say so, a 9700k is just over 300, which is much cheaper than when it first released. In the UK anyway. 9900k is 440, its expensive but not as much as they were at release - obviously YMMV.

 

Personally my latest rig is a Ryzen system, my last intel was a 4770k 5 years ago, it still performs like a champ but I wanted a Team Red system on the DDR4 platform. Its sweet!

Hmm...

 

PCPartPicker Part List

CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K 3.6 GHz 8-Core Processor  ($394.89 @ B&H) 
Total: $394.89
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-02-01 16:16 EST-0500

Just now, Mockingbird said:

Hmm...

 

PCPartPicker Part List

CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K 3.6 GHz 8-Core Processor  ($394.89 @ B&H) 
Total: $394.89
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-02-01 16:16 EST-0500

Like I said... your mileage may vary - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Intel-BX80684I79700K-I7-9700K-3-60GHZ-SKT1151-Noir/dp/B07HHN6KBZ

 

I'm not trying to catch you out dude. Prices vary from region to region, god forbid anyone is trying to build a PC in Australia, Id have to remortgage my house :) 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Yes they tend to hold their price far better than other components, but they do come down..

 

ANYWAY my decision has been made, instead of a CPU upgrade I ordered an NVIDIA Shield (2019) because I am fed up of constant streaming issues with Plex on my Xbox One X, which even Microsoft Devs have confirmed as a bug multiple times but they keep pushing new builds that break it. From one evening to the next after my Xbox seemingly updated I can no longer stream 1080p content without it buffering every 5 mins. My setup is fine, the Plex app on Xbox isn't. 

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, forster said:

Like I said... your mileage may vary - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Intel-BX80684I79700K-I7-9700K-3-60GHZ-SKT1151-Noir/dp/B07HHN6KBZ

 

I'm not trying to catch you out dude. Prices vary from region to region, god forbid anyone is trying to build a PC in Australia, Id have to remortgage my house :) 

With prices like that, no wonder that AMD is outselling Intel by 6:1

4 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Yes they tend to hold their price far better than other components, but they do come down..

 

ANYWAY my decision has been made, instead of a CPU upgrade I ordered an NVIDIA Shield (2019) because I am fed up of constant streaming issues with Plex on my Xbox One X, which even Microsoft Devs have confirmed as a bug multiple times but they keep pushing new builds that break it. From one evening to the next after my Xbox seemingly updated I can no longer stream 1080p content without it buffering every 5 mins. My setup is fine, the Plex app on Xbox isn't. 

Nice, Id love a shield - I run a Plex server on my WD PR4100 NAS, and client on my Apple TV and it's rock solid. If I had a shield I'd stock it full of emulators and roms and make it be my retro gaming bizztch :) 

4 minutes ago, forster said:

Nice, Id love a shield - I run a Plex server on my WD PR4100 NAS, and client on my Apple TV and it's rock solid. If I had a shield I'd stock it full of emulators and roms and make it be my retro gaming bizztch :) 

Yeah I am looking forward to just being able to throw content at it, Plex on Xbox is rubbish, the settings menu crashes and can only be recovered by force quitting the app and the reopening it, so that along with all the streaming bugs is doing my head in.

 

My TV is actually an Android TV but the Plex app on that does not pass through Dolby Atmos/digital properly to my receiver so I can't even default to using that.

 

I'm also going to do this for my Xbox One S upstairs in my bedroom, since that trick works for non HDR content (no good for the Xbox One X 4K setup).

 

Copying for reference:

  • Install Kodi on your Xbox One
  • Launch Kodi, goto addons; search for Plex and install Plex
  • Run Plex Addon
  • In Plex settings enable X265
  • In Plex settings set remote quality to original
  • Set Plex addon to run at Kodi startup.
20 hours ago, Steven P. said:

Yes they tend to hold their price far better than other components, but they do come down..

 

ANYWAY my decision has been made, instead of a CPU upgrade I ordered an NVIDIA Shield (2019) because I am fed up of constant streaming issues with Plex on my Xbox One X, which even Microsoft Devs have confirmed as a bug multiple times but they keep pushing new builds that break it. From one evening to the next after my Xbox seemingly updated I can no longer stream 1080p content without it buffering every 5 mins. My setup is fine, the Plex app on Xbox isn't. 

You'll love it, its own built in plex server is nice and smooth. I rarely watch terrestrial tv anymore I just stream everything :)

 

 oh and while it's still free in beta, geforce stream gaming is way way better than stadia too!

4 hours ago, Daniel F. said:

You'll love it, its own built in plex server is nice and smooth. I rarely watch terrestrial tv anymore I just stream everything :)

 

 oh and while it's still free in beta, geforce stream gaming is way way better than stadia too!

Yeah I just signed up to it, will have a look at it tomorrow :) 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!