Why new laptops ship with old drivers?


Recommended Posts

I bought a new laptop recently, and AMD Ryzen. I installed a drivers utility to check that everything was up to date and it detected quite a few drivers out of date, display, CPU, etc, one of them marked as being from 2017, when the laptop had not been built yet.

 

Why would a manufacturer ship a new laptop with old drivers? I am asking this because perhaps there is a reason for me not to update to the latest drivers or I am just wondering if the software I am using to update the drivers, a free utility that I found in DuckDuckGo, might be giving me the wrong dates about the old drivers. 

I wouldn't mess around with this if everything was working properly. There could be a number of reasons why the drivers are older. The newer versions which the utility is pulling down may be generic drivers whereas the manufacturer has customised drivers specific to their hardware. It could also just be an error on the driver checkers part.

 

It's also possible that your laptop had the Microsoft drivers for some hardware and the driver update utility has pulled in newer ones from the manufacturer. This isn't always necessary.

 

Do you have an example of a driver which was updated?

How old is old?

 

That laptop could have been sat on a shelf in a warehouse for months whilst new drivers were released so I wouldn't ever expect any piece of hardware to come out of the box fully up to date.

 

I personally would recommend going direct to the manufacturer to get drivers - if it's an AMD CPU then go to AMD for the drivers.

28 minutes ago, Vince800 said:

Do you have an example of a driver which was updated?

I remembered something that is probably important, the laptop came without Windows installed.

 

I installed  the official Windows 10 image that I downloaded from the official Microsoft website and I bought the registration number for Windows 10 Pro from a reseller in ebay for 5 Euros, activated without problems.

 

Perhaps it is a Windows problem and it does not have to do with the manufacturer.

 

I do not remember the specifics of the drivers what were updated, it was eight and one of them was the graphics card chipset and the other one for the network card.

Edited by fastcat

Driver utilities are the worst thing ever. They look for any file that has an older date without knowing what or why. 
 

Did you actually visually inspect these drivers in device manager to confirm it? Who was the provider? The devices? 
 

Not all files get updated regularly because they are at stable, working versions. Driver utilities don’t care who the source of the newer file is, they will run with it. Even if it’s not designed or known to work with your machine. 

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, fastcat said:

I remembered something that is probably important, the laptop came without Windows installed.

 

I installed  the official Windows 10 image that I downloaded from the official Microsoft website and I bought the registration number for Windows 10 Pro from a reseller in ebay for 5 Euros, activated without problems.

 

Perhaps it is a Windows problem and it does not have to do with the manufacturer.

 

I do not remember the specifics of the drivers what were updated, it was eight and one of them was the graphics card chipset and the other one for the network card.

No perhaps it's a problem with the driver utility you used.

 

It's best to follow the advice from @adrynalyne above and check in device manager in future instead of using questionable update tools.

  • Like 2

There's a couple reasons a new laptop could have older drivers. OEMs don't update their base image that they flash too frequently. The laptops/towers also sit in a warehouse longer than you'd think as well.

 

Some drivers update rather frequently so it's not hard to think how a machine sitting in a warehouse or on the shelf unused would quickly have drivers go out of date.

 

Most of the time there's no issue with this as most of the updates are minor or fix very specific things.

 

I agree for the most part with the rest of the people in this thread as well; most driver utilities suck and don't do their job properly. There's ONE utility I've found that actually does things right for driver scans and updates, and that's IObit Driver Booster. No need to pay for the PRO version, the basic version scans critical drivers and shows which ones have new versions and allows you to install them 1 by 1. I have not had any issue using this on my laptop since I got it a few months ago. The same can't be said for other driver scanners.

Don’t fix what isn’t broke. I rarely go searching for newer drivers or bios versions unless I’m having a specific issue. 
 

Most of the time I wipe a factory imaged laptop and install my own instance of windows. Windows update usually does a pretty good job at installing any missing drivers. If there is one that it can’t find, then I go to oem website. 
 

Updating drivers for the sake of updating is just silly to me.  

OK, good advice here, thank you.

 

I had used Iobit Drive Booster free version like Brandon said, they are a Chinese company which did not inspire me too much trust but their software is one of the most downloaded in Majorgeeks.

Edited by fastcat
21 hours ago, shockz said:

Don’t fix what isn’t broke. I rarely go searching for newer drivers or bios versions unless I’m having a specific issue. 
 

Most of the time I wipe a factory imaged laptop and install my own instance of windows. Windows update usually does a pretty good job at installing any missing drivers. If there is one that it can’t find, then I go to oem website. 
 

Updating drivers for the sake of updating is just silly to me.  

Couldn't agree with that more! As Brandon says though, updating graphic drivers may be important for gamers, which I'm not, but those drivers are the ONLY one's I've ever had screw up a machine, so I rarely purposely go looking for those either.

If you had done a clean install of Windows ... I would have just gone to the notebook manufactures website (like Dell) and grab the latest drivers.  I avoid 3rd party driver update utilities.  With that said, drivers or BIOS updates don't scare me ... I keep my crap up to date.

26 minutes ago, Jim K said:

If you had done a clean install of Windows ... I would have just gone to the notebook manufactures website (like Dell) and grab the latest drivers.  I avoid 3rd party driver update utilities.  With that said, drivers or BIOS updates don't scare me ... I keep my crap up to date.

gone are the days of doing a bios update from floppy disks!

1 minute ago, TrekRich said:

i never did, always had to make sure you did a full format of the floppy first. none of that quick format rubbish!

No me neither. Even when I took a risk once of replacing a Packard Bell BIOS back in the late 90s with the generic Gigabyte one (the board was a Gigabyte) to unlock some features PB had restricted. That being said, I advise to never do this.

Hello,

 

Generally speaking, laptops are going to ship with whatever the manufacturer has determined to be compatible, working software on them (device drivers, manufacturer and machine-specific software, etc.).  If the manufacturer provides some sort of system-specific update software (I know Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Lenovo do, and probably others as well), then running that to get the latest drivers and software should work.  You can also try using Windows Update to download drivers, or visiting the silicon vendor's support site (AMD, Intel, Nvidia, Realtek, etc.) to see what sort of device drivers they offer.  One thing to keep in mind is that drivers from the latter tend not to update (or even disable) and manufacturer-specific customizations.

 

Regards,


Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!