Why are 4K Blu-rays still so expensive while 4K digital movies are getting cheaper?


Recommended Posts

It's amazing that on Vudu, GoogePlay and ITunes, they always have a lot of 4K movies on sale that you can buy for as low as $5. And it's great because most 4K TVs are smart TVs so everyone is set up to watch them. However with 4K Blu-ray, they are still about $30 a movie. Maybe $20 if you're lucky. And not to mention you still have to spend another $200 for a player.

So why are 4K Blu-rays still so expensive? Why don't they drop in price like digital movies are?

Let's see: a physical, tangible product that needs to change hands several times in the supply chain before it gets transported to a retail store vs digital. Hmm...🤔

 

 

Well digital movies used to be more expensive. But that seems to be changing as digital movies are starting to drop in price.

 

It makes 4K Blu-ray a tough buy for me since I have to shell out money for a player and then spend inflated prices for movies. I can already stream the 4K content right onto my TV, so I don't see how 4K Blu-rays are going to become successful if this continues.

4 hours ago, DaDude said:

Well digital movies used to be more expensive. But that seems to be changing as digital movies are starting to drop in price.

 

It makes 4K Blu-ray a tough buy for me since I have to shell out money for a player and then spend inflated prices for movies. I can already stream the 4K content right onto my TV, so I don't see how 4K Blu-rays are going to become successful if this continues.

Until your internet goes out and you can't watch a movie.

  • Like 2
20 hours ago, Peresvet said:

Let's see: a physical, tangible product that needs to change hands several times in the supply chain before it gets transported to a retail store

this is the reason price remains a bit higher for physical discs

 

on the digital front encoding processes have improved over the years. Going from x264 encoding to x265 had a MAJOR jump; file sizes got a LOT smaller and easier to stream. I don't do 4K so can't give an exact comparison but using 1080p for example a 1 hour show went from around 6GB to around 500MB. Scale that up to 4K and you can see how that makes a difference for downloading/streaming bandwidth allowing for easier decreases in price.

Just now, Satico Satellite said:

I can't remember the last significant Internet outage... Are you still on DSL or have Comcast? LOL

lol F Comcast. They're like the worst ISP in the US lol

 

I swear they have outages almost weekly across the country causing issues with Credit Card processing and the like.

3 hours ago, Brandon H said:

lol F Comcast. They're like the worst ISP in the US lol

 

I swear they have outages almost weekly across the country causing issues with Credit Card processing and the like.

My parents use Spectrum and they say they always have a couple of outages every month, which is concerning to hear. I really wonder if they are having a router or modem issue because I can't imagine how a cable provider will allow that many frequent outages. That's just unacceptable!

  • 3 weeks later...

I think there is pros and cons to both. I was a big lover of Blu Ray's - Had over 400 to my collection over the years but sold them all last year. I stream some, download some. But then Netflix for example never keeps the same film for long. So having that copy on Blu Ray would be the better option. With today so many streaming services i think Blu Ray will lose out, I can see 8K being more and more expensive and less popular. Streaming will be the new way of film watching.

  • Like 2
On 4/8/2020 at 11:11 PM, DaDude said:

It makes 4K Blu-ray a tough buy for me since I have to shell out money for a player and then spend inflated prices for movies.

So don't!?

On 4/8/2020 at 11:11 PM, DaDude said:

I can already stream the 4K content right onto my TV

So do!?

 

On 4/8/2020 at 11:11 PM, DaDude said:

I don't see how 4K Blu-rays are going to become successful

Become?  August 5, 2015 is when 4K Blu-ray became a thing, and since then they have sold just fine (to the limited market that know what they are buying).

Making 4k UHD BDs aren't like making original FHD BDs, in many cases the 4k versions have more layers, so more complex and it costs time and money to make, and ship them.  Plus retail is going to want it's cut, a piece of that price goes to the retailer.   The other factor is streaming now, more people just stream and don't buy physical media as much anymore.   Look at music for example, streaming way outstrips physical CD sales now.    Movies are following that trend, and have been.  Games also are following that trend, they've been digital download heavy with gaming on the PC for way longer, thanks to steam etc.   

 

While you can make a case that you then don't actually own anything when it's just digital, and I get it, but when you're paying a fraction of the price compared to the physical version, losing access to that, say, 5 years later, isn't going to hit you as hard.   And that is if you even do lose access to it, to date more people just go for the spotify/netflix sub and just stream without actually buying anything, so they don't really care when something is removed from the library in the future.

  • 9 months later...

4k UHD disks are routinely on sale for $10-$15, and they usually come with a digital copy as well... Yeah, new releases are usually $20-$30 at first, but they always seem to go on sale. For example, here's a bunch of films on sale:

https://slickdeals.net/f/14826871-4k-movies-1917-or-top-gun-12-each-john-wick-chapter-2-10-more

 

 

15 minutes ago, Fezmid said:

4k UHD disks are routinely on sale for $10-$15, and they usually come with a digital copy as well... Yeah, new releases are usually $20-$30 at first, but they always seem to go on sale. For example, here's a bunch of films on sale:

https://slickdeals.net/f/14826871-4k-movies-1917-or-top-gun-12-each-john-wick-chapter-2-10-more

Usually when I get a digital copy key included with a bluray it expired three (or more) months ago :p

25 minutes ago, LostCat said:

Usually when I get a digital copy key included with a bluray it expired three (or more) months ago :p

I'd be taking it back to the store and complaining.  

36 minutes ago, LostCat said:

Usually when I get a digital copy key included with a bluray it expired three (or more) months ago :p

Really? I don't think I've seen more than a couple of them expire -- I literally just digitized my entire DVD/BD collection about a year ago and redeemed all of the digital codes in the movies - and they almost all worked, even when they said they expired. Either I'm really lucky or you're really unlucky. :(

Production costs. Plain and simple. We're talking about having to have buildings, machines and people to create the disks, labels, boxes, inserts.. etc.

 

And like others have mentioned, there's a long chain of hands that physical products go thru before they get to yours.

 

Digital is (basically) just one computer system to the next... and even with the costs of that upkeep, it will be far cheaper than the other option.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!