Why are 4K Blu-rays still so expensive while 4K digital movies are getting cheaper?


Recommended Posts

It's amazing that on Vudu, GoogePlay and ITunes, they always have a lot of 4K movies on sale that you can buy for as low as $5. And it's great because most 4K TVs are smart TVs so everyone is set up to watch them. However with 4K Blu-ray, they are still about $30 a movie. Maybe $20 if you're lucky. And not to mention you still have to spend another $200 for a player.

So why are 4K Blu-rays still so expensive? Why don't they drop in price like digital movies are?

Let's see: a physical, tangible product that needs to change hands several times in the supply chain before it gets transported to a retail store vs digital. Hmm...🤔

 

 

Well digital movies used to be more expensive. But that seems to be changing as digital movies are starting to drop in price.

 

It makes 4K Blu-ray a tough buy for me since I have to shell out money for a player and then spend inflated prices for movies. I can already stream the 4K content right onto my TV, so I don't see how 4K Blu-rays are going to become successful if this continues.

4 hours ago, DaDude said:

Well digital movies used to be more expensive. But that seems to be changing as digital movies are starting to drop in price.

 

It makes 4K Blu-ray a tough buy for me since I have to shell out money for a player and then spend inflated prices for movies. I can already stream the 4K content right onto my TV, so I don't see how 4K Blu-rays are going to become successful if this continues.

Until your internet goes out and you can't watch a movie.

  • Like 2
20 hours ago, Peresvet said:

Let's see: a physical, tangible product that needs to change hands several times in the supply chain before it gets transported to a retail store

this is the reason price remains a bit higher for physical discs

 

on the digital front encoding processes have improved over the years. Going from x264 encoding to x265 had a MAJOR jump; file sizes got a LOT smaller and easier to stream. I don't do 4K so can't give an exact comparison but using 1080p for example a 1 hour show went from around 6GB to around 500MB. Scale that up to 4K and you can see how that makes a difference for downloading/streaming bandwidth allowing for easier decreases in price.

Just now, Satico Satellite said:

I can't remember the last significant Internet outage... Are you still on DSL or have Comcast? LOL

lol F Comcast. They're like the worst ISP in the US lol

 

I swear they have outages almost weekly across the country causing issues with Credit Card processing and the like.

3 hours ago, Brandon H said:

lol F Comcast. They're like the worst ISP in the US lol

 

I swear they have outages almost weekly across the country causing issues with Credit Card processing and the like.

My parents use Spectrum and they say they always have a couple of outages every month, which is concerning to hear. I really wonder if they are having a router or modem issue because I can't imagine how a cable provider will allow that many frequent outages. That's just unacceptable!

  • 3 weeks later...

I think there is pros and cons to both. I was a big lover of Blu Ray's - Had over 400 to my collection over the years but sold them all last year. I stream some, download some. But then Netflix for example never keeps the same film for long. So having that copy on Blu Ray would be the better option. With today so many streaming services i think Blu Ray will lose out, I can see 8K being more and more expensive and less popular. Streaming will be the new way of film watching.

  • Like 2
On 4/8/2020 at 11:11 PM, DaDude said:

It makes 4K Blu-ray a tough buy for me since I have to shell out money for a player and then spend inflated prices for movies.

So don't!?

On 4/8/2020 at 11:11 PM, DaDude said:

I can already stream the 4K content right onto my TV

So do!?

 

On 4/8/2020 at 11:11 PM, DaDude said:

I don't see how 4K Blu-rays are going to become successful

Become?  August 5, 2015 is when 4K Blu-ray became a thing, and since then they have sold just fine (to the limited market that know what they are buying).

Making 4k UHD BDs aren't like making original FHD BDs, in many cases the 4k versions have more layers, so more complex and it costs time and money to make, and ship them.  Plus retail is going to want it's cut, a piece of that price goes to the retailer.   The other factor is streaming now, more people just stream and don't buy physical media as much anymore.   Look at music for example, streaming way outstrips physical CD sales now.    Movies are following that trend, and have been.  Games also are following that trend, they've been digital download heavy with gaming on the PC for way longer, thanks to steam etc.   

 

While you can make a case that you then don't actually own anything when it's just digital, and I get it, but when you're paying a fraction of the price compared to the physical version, losing access to that, say, 5 years later, isn't going to hit you as hard.   And that is if you even do lose access to it, to date more people just go for the spotify/netflix sub and just stream without actually buying anything, so they don't really care when something is removed from the library in the future.

  • 9 months later...

4k UHD disks are routinely on sale for $10-$15, and they usually come with a digital copy as well... Yeah, new releases are usually $20-$30 at first, but they always seem to go on sale. For example, here's a bunch of films on sale:

https://slickdeals.net/f/14826871-4k-movies-1917-or-top-gun-12-each-john-wick-chapter-2-10-more

 

 

15 minutes ago, Fezmid said:

4k UHD disks are routinely on sale for $10-$15, and they usually come with a digital copy as well... Yeah, new releases are usually $20-$30 at first, but they always seem to go on sale. For example, here's a bunch of films on sale:

https://slickdeals.net/f/14826871-4k-movies-1917-or-top-gun-12-each-john-wick-chapter-2-10-more

Usually when I get a digital copy key included with a bluray it expired three (or more) months ago :p

25 minutes ago, LostCat said:

Usually when I get a digital copy key included with a bluray it expired three (or more) months ago :p

I'd be taking it back to the store and complaining.  

36 minutes ago, LostCat said:

Usually when I get a digital copy key included with a bluray it expired three (or more) months ago :p

Really? I don't think I've seen more than a couple of them expire -- I literally just digitized my entire DVD/BD collection about a year ago and redeemed all of the digital codes in the movies - and they almost all worked, even when they said they expired. Either I'm really lucky or you're really unlucky. :(

Production costs. Plain and simple. We're talking about having to have buildings, machines and people to create the disks, labels, boxes, inserts.. etc.

 

And like others have mentioned, there's a long chain of hands that physical products go thru before they get to yours.

 

Digital is (basically) just one computer system to the next... and even with the costs of that upkeep, it will be far cheaper than the other option.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!