Recommended Posts

I'm a power user on Windows and build my own rigs. I use Mac only for video editing and music. Here is what I posted on Macrumors:

 

I currently have an early 2011 MBP with an i7 which I upgraded to 16GB RAM and a 1TB SSD. I use it primarily for Logic pro X and some video editing in Final Cut Pro. I am looking to upgrade since it won't get any new OS updates plus I just bought a new 3rd party battery but it doesn't seem like it will last long.

I have my $1200 stimulus and can probably go an extra $200. Is the i5 powerful enough for what I am doing and is the RAM user upgradeable? I did my MBP RAM upgrade, so I am tech savvy enough to do it if needed. I configured one for $1,499 which would be the i5, 16GB RAM, and 1TB SSD. I'm wondering if I should just get the 8GB version and 512GB SSD and just upgrade the RAM myself later if needed and then use external storage for all my data.

Any advice? My main question is if the i7 is worth the extra $200.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1395280-mac-mini-advice/
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

IIRC, Mac Mini's are dead. MacMinis aren't meant for heavy load like video editing.

 

What GPU does that MBP have?

The new Mac Mini's are pro focused and are certainly geared towards what I'm doing. I was just wondering if 8GB RAM is really good enough and if the $200 upgrade to i7 is really warranted. I think I'll probably want 16GB.

If you're dead set on Mac OS, I'd go with the Mac Mini w/ i7. You can upgrade the RAM, though you need to take it apart. It's fairly easy to do by just watching a YouTube video.

https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/mac-mini/#cpu_and_gpu

 

Price for value - just keep in mind it's an 8th gen Intel CPU. Not that it's a bad thing, just keep in mind it's not the latest/greatest

2 minutes ago, tsupersonic said:

If you're dead set on Mac OS, I'd go with the Mac Mini w/ i7. You can upgrade the RAM, though you need to take it apart. It's fairly easy to do by just watching a YouTube video.

https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/mac-mini/#cpu_and_gpu

 

Price for value - just keep in mind it's an 8th gen Intel CPU. Not that it's a bad thing, just keep in mind it's not the latest/greatest

Thanks for the advice. I had to take apart my MBP too and it wasn't so bad to upgrade the RAM. I think I will go with the i7 and 8GB RAM.

 

I am dead set on Mac OS because I love it for video editing and especially Logic Pro X. I have a nice weighted keyboard hooked up to it for my music and I'm not aware of any Windows software that has all the instruments like Logic Pro does.

How powerful is your main Windows PC? If you need mac specific software you could always try loading MacOS in a VM if you don't want to dabble in Hackintosh

 

Could save you some money if it works well so I'd personally say it's worth a try before purchasing new hardware 🙂

 

I've done it a few times and it runs as good as any other VM anymore once you patch VMWare to unlock the MacOS code

 

https://techsviewer.com/how-to-install-macos-10-15-catalina-on-vmware-on-windows-pc/

21 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

How powerful is your main Windows PC? If you need mac specific software you could always try loading MacOS in a VM if you don't want to dabble in Hackintosh

 

Could save you some money if it works well so I'd personally say it's worth a try before purchasing new hardware 🙂

 

I've done it a few times and it runs as good as any other VM anymore once you patch VMWare to unlock the MacOS code

 

https://techsviewer.com/how-to-install-macos-10-15-catalina-on-vmware-on-windows-pc/

It's pretty powerful. I built it only a couple years ago. Coffee Lake i7, 16GB, 2 m2 drives, various other SSD's and a RAID, 1080 video card. I didn't know you could run MacOS in a VM and I've never looked too far into Hackintosh. Maybe I'll have to look into how to do it in a VM?

36 minutes ago, patseguin said:

It's pretty powerful. I built it only a couple years ago. Coffee Lake i7, 16GB, 2 m2 drives, various other SSD's and a RAID, 1080 video card. I didn't know you could run MacOS in a VM and I've never looked too far into Hackintosh. Maybe I'll have to look into how to do it in a VM?

I did it years ago with VMWare on Leopard. It's damn simple after you watch a few YT videos.

1 hour ago, Mindovermaster said:

IIRC, Mac Mini's are dead. MacMinis aren't meant for heavy load like video editing.

 

What GPU does that MBP have?

Mac Minis just got updated a few months ago with cheaper storage options. And usually have a 2-3 year refresh cycle. Not dead. And their main use typically fall under power users in corporations. I've seen some pretty insane mac mini farms/arrays in datacenters.

 

I've got an i7, 16GB of RAM, end of 2018 version. Runs great under my standard administrator and developer load. Don't do much with graphics, but for the light work I do, I've not had issues with the UHD 630 in it.

 

--

 

Stay away from hackintosh unless you're looking for a constant worry of wondering if the next incremental update will blow up your system. They also never work quite right with one thing or another. It's a constant baby sit. Speaking from experience. 

Edited by shockz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!