Network traffic effecting my internet speed?


Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I have OBS and a plugin within it called NDI. It allows me to stream and capture gaming audio/video from my a host machine to a client computer on my network instead of draining my main machine resources to capture video AND game at the same time. If noticed that when I'm gaming with this setup running, my ping jumps up to 300-350 ms. If I turn off OBS on both machines, it goes back down to 60-70 ms. I thought that network traffic shouldn't effect my internet speed. It only leads me to believe that I need to toggle a setting within my router, but I'm not sure what to adjust. Can anyone provide assistance with this? I apologize if this falls more into OBS territory...

15 hours ago, mist3rg1ass said:

I thought that network traffic shouldn't effect my internet speed.

Not sure where you got that idea?

 

Your device uses the same nic to talk to this other machine on your network as it uses to talk to the gateway to get to the internet.  If you load up said interface with traffic to something else on your network.. That for sure can have an effect on your "internet" speed for that device.  Or the other device.  Now what it shouldn't do is affect some other device traffic to the internet.

Yeah but that is a bit more difficult than you think if you multihome a box.  Unless you create another connection between the A and B on different network.

 

You can for sure limit an interface to only local without a gateway.  But your one with your gateway can still be used for local traffic, so setting up the metrics right, can get a bit problematic... the way to be SURE would be to use a different interface connected to the other machine on some different network without gateways.

 

Or if you can create vlans, multihome the device so that for internet use interface A that is in a different network than your local network.  So your sure PC would never use "internet" interface for local traffic.  A hacky way to do it is just to run multiple IP ranges on the same L2..  Comes down to what features your router supports, etc.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!