• 0

Teams for personal use - "use your phone"?


Question

Hi guys,

 

With a possible interview coming up, I've been informed that they would use Teams for the video calling. Wanting to have everything set up in case I get to that stage, I tried to install the Teams application on my laptop and I was asked how I planned on using the application. I selected, "personal use" and was told to install the app on my phone.

If I install the app on my phone and sign in, do I then get the ability to sign in to the desktop application? Or are Microsoft suggesting that the only way to use Teams for personal use is to use it on my phone? If it is the latter then it doesn't make any sense to me. I thought Microsoft is trying to push Teams in an attempt to rival Zoom, but when I was asked to install the app on my phone my first thought was, "screw this, I wonder if they will let us hold a Zoom meeting instead?"

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have it installed on my desktop and laptop and you can use it fine. When you join a meeting set up by a corporate user they just have to admit you as a guest. I use it to join most of my work Teams calls.

  • 0
1 minute ago, conan_2000 said:

I have it installed on my desktop and laptop and you can use it fine. When you join a meeting set up by a corporate user they just have to admit you as a guest. I use it to join most of my work Teams calls.

Can you remember how you set it up? Did you have to install the app on the phone as well, or do you receive an email invitation that logs you into their meeting?

  • 0

I dont know if it helps but for stability i always sign in on Teams using the web browser version as i found the app approach a little convoluted, i did this on macOS Catalina + Google Chrome for maximum compatibility, it seemed more seamless than the app approach.

 

If you wanted a backup then if you have a tablet have the app + link ready to go on that also. I tend to do this to keep my options open, ensure your internet and WIFI is top notch too, i.e. make sure the signal is really strong on WiFi. 

 

However the main thing is to remain calm, ive done plenty of interviews and have been interviewed over Zoom & Teams and work in IT, we all understand there are problems sometimes with joining, the worst is panicking, just calmly work through the problem and youll get there. Ive never marked anyone down for having a problem with Zoom/Teams (if they do i dont know if i would want to work for them). 

 

Sorry if this is off at a tangent please feel free to ignore, 

 

Make sure the background is as clear as possible / professional as possible, blank wall is perfect, however clean with not too many things in the background is always good. The virtual backgrounds are good if you have a problem with this. 

 

Make sure your face gets plenty of light (not blinding sharp light), make sure the light source is not behind you, dark rooms, lighting from behind will make the video more blocky/noisy hard to see as the DSP tries to keep up. 

 

Having a blank background with nothing moving is also useful if you have low bandwidth (especially upload speed).

 

A good cheap microphone from amazon is really worth the purchase unless your laptop has a really really good microphone, ive found that many of these come across as rather tinny. Of course a nice set of headphones with microphone is also a big win here. 

 

Keep pets/family distractions out of the room to help you concentrate. 

 

Try and get the camera up to face/eye level, having the camera low shooting up your nose is not the end of the world, but camera's up high lends itself to a professional look. Also try to keep eye contact on the camera and not on the screen so much, of course you will need to read the screen to read as much body language, however trying to keep your eyes on the camera looks great from the other side as youre looking straight at us instead of looking off at the side, again this is not the end of the world, just a little extra pro touch. 

 

Keep a glass of water with you, its easy to forget this as with interviews you always get that offer as you walk through the door, however remote it's up to you to remember. 

 

Hope you get it, good luck!

  • 0
20 minutes ago, REM2000 said:

Hope you get it, good luck!

Many thanks for the advice and luck! I'm getting a bit ahead of myself since it isn't confirmed that I will get an interview, but I saw that it would be conducted through Teams if it happens and I wanted to be sure.

 

Yeah, I've had meetings through Zoom and Teams before so it was more about the sign-in on my personal machine, but I'm glad your other advice covers the various factors I'd been thinking about. (Y)

  • 0

from my understanding of teams you don't even need an account if they send you an invite link. it will allow you to log into the meeting as a guest and then you can go either through the web browser or it will give you a link to launch the app and continue as a guest.

  • Like 2
  • 0
54 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

from my understanding of teams you don't even need an account if they send you an invite link. it will allow you to log into the meeting as a guest and then you can go either through the web browser or it will give you a link to launch the app and continue as a guest.

Yup, that is how it works at my org. The email usually contains a link that works in the browser or a toll free number to dial in.

  • 0

We've interviewed people over Teams where the candidate doesn't have Teams. As said above, they just use the web-based version. I think there are a few limitations, but it'll suffice. if you want the pre-requisites installed or want to test it out, DM me and I can send you a link to join me on a call.

  • 0

Teams is a multi-headed application.  You can use it at the same time in multiple locations.  It will detect and ask accordingly.

 

The issue will largely be in which device / app "owns" audio and video, and again, it should ask you appropriately -- as in "we see you're already in the meeting over there, do you want to use audio here?"  And if that doesn't make sense, sometimes I call into meetings using audio on my phone while using web or desktop client for viewing shared data.  No big deal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!