Questions about shifting Windows 10 to a New SSD without reinstalling OS.


Recommended Posts

New to this SSD related stuff and recently saved some $ to get a 120GB SSD to shift my OS to that drive than HDD.

I have certain question regarding the shifting process and how its done. Kindly take your time in reading them since I'm new and might potentially get my d**k stuck in a toaster if the instructions aren't clear.

 

1 - What is the efficient way to transfer the OS to HDD without reinstalling everything?

I've read there are certain tools to perform such tasks, Macrium Reflect / AOMEI Backupper / EaseUS. So if I use them to shift files to the new SSD then restart to enter BIOS and change the boot drive to the new SSD, will the system normally boot from the SSD afterwards after i clear the old OS files from HDD? is it that simple or am i missing anything big here?

Also, what is the best safe/free software to perform this? I'm planning to use AOMEI but i need answer from experienced people.

2 - Will all my current settings / changes be there when i change the boot drive?

I've spent months on optimizing my windows 10 for better performance with information from tons of videos/forums/articles/posts etc and I have no intention to do them again because at this current state everything is working fine and I'm not planning on screwing anything up again.

3 - I have all the external (non-OS related) drivers such as Nvidia drivers / other hardware drivers installed in C drive, after i shift the OS to SSD do i need to reinstall everything or those drivers will be there as is?

 

4 - What is this "clone / cloning " i keep reading about? is it a fancy term to replicate the OS files from HDD to SDD? or something serious i should focus about?

 

5 - There are so many tutorials and videos but I can't find anything that actually works, if you have anything please link them.

 

6 - Anything else i should look for?

 

Other Details :

Current OS : Windows 10 Education 64bit

OS Installed on : C drive (100GB Partitioned / only 24.8GB used)

Other specs : Ryzen 3 1200 [no OC] / Palit GTX 1050 2GB GDDR3 / G-skill Aegis 8GB DDR4

Mother-board : Gigabyte A320M HD2 CF

Any help on this is appreciated, thanks for reading.

I highly recommend Macromedia Reflect, I've used it a few times myself and it is free for home use with no catches or crapware getting installed on your PC. https://www.macrium.com/reflectfree

 

Here's a video tutorial on how to clone your Windows disk to the new one

 

 

This video assumes the new disk is bigger, but you should be okay cloning to the smaller disk if the used disk space on the partition(s) are smaller than the new one. You may have to add the partitions manually to the new drive and then resize C:\ yourself so that all of the partitions fit. Just calculate down what you will have to reduce for C:\ in order to fit all of the partitions on the new drive because I am not sure if Macromedia Reflect does this automatically with the "copy selected partitions" link.

Hello,

 

Keep in mind that Windows will not perform as well as it can if you are doing a straight clone of a HDD to a SSD.

 

When Windows is installed initially the setup program checks the drive type and configures the default behavior of some services, most notably the disk defragmentation and file indexing services (and possibly others as well--the system prefetcher seems like it would be a likely candidate).

 

Windows does not check for any differences to the OS drive after the initial install, so these will be left with their original startup values.  Doing a clean install gets around having to look for lists of differences in service startups, registry entry values, etc., and go edit them.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • 2 weeks later...
  On 21/11/2020 at 02:15, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

Keep in mind that Windows will not perform as well as it can if you are doing a straight clone of a HDD to a SSD.

 

When Windows is installed initially the setup program checks the drive type and configures the default behavior of some services, most notably the disk defragmentation and file indexing services (and possibly others as well--the system prefetcher seems like it would be a likely candidate).

 

Windows does not check for any differences to the OS drive after the initial install, so these will be left with their original startup values.

Doing a clean install gets around having to look for lists of differences in service startups, registry entry values, etc., and go edit them.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Expand  

Agreed, I know it's difficult however i would recommend a fresh install. 

 

However after you have cloned windows to the SSD just run a simple check that Win10 has recognized it's now sitting on an SSD and has TRIM enabled, which is important for the performance of your SSD. Without TRIM enabled no garbage collection will be performed and you SSD performance will degrade drastically. 

 

https://www.windowscentral.com/how-ensure-trim-enabled-windows-10-speed-ssd-performance

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
  On 21/11/2020 at 02:15, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

Keep in mind that Windows will not perform as well as it can if you are doing a straight clone of a HDD to a SSD.

 

When Windows is installed initially the setup program checks the drive type and configures the default behavior of some services, most notably the disk defragmentation and file indexing services (and possibly others as well--the system prefetcher seems like it would be a likely candidate).

 

Windows does not check for any differences to the OS drive after the initial install, so these will be left with their original startup values.  Doing a clean install gets around having to look for lists of differences in service startups, registry entry values, etc., and go edit them.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Expand  

 If you install windows to an SSD and clone it to an HDD, it will run like total crap (even worse than just clean installing to an HDD) and if you open "defragment and optimize drives " will still say you are running an SSD.

 

If you do a winsat formal from the command prompt, it re-benchmarks the system and configures itself properly now for an HDD instead of an SSD. if you reopen "defragment and optimize drives " it will now say HDD instead of SSD. After a few reboots, it runs just like HDD clean install. (Probably after it gets the prefetch reconfigured)  Same works both ways I think.

 

Personally I like True Image, not because Macromedia Reflect is bad but because Macromedia Reflects source and destination menu freaks me out. I find True Image to be MUCH simpler. With Macromedia Reflect I'm always terrified I'm going to nuke the wrong drive.

 

 

True Image

 

clone_004.png

 

Macromedia Reflect

 

ximg_599e009199af7.png.pagespeed.gp+jp+j

 

  • Like 3
  On 14/12/2020 at 16:17, warwagon said:

 If you install windows to an SSD and clone it to an HDD, it will run like total crap (even worse than just clean installing to an HDD) and if you open "defragment and optimize drives " will still say you are running an SSD.

 

If you do a winsat formal from the command prompt, it re-benchmarks the system and configures itself properly now for an HDD instead of an SSD. if you reopen "defragment and optimize drives " it will now say HDD instead of SSD. After a few reboots, it runs just like HDD clean install. (Probably after it gets the prefetch reconfigured)  Same works both ways I think.

 

Personally I like True Image, not because Macromedia Reflect is bad but because Macromedia Reflects source and destination menu freaks me out. I find True Image to be MUCH simpler. With Macromedia Reflect I'm always terrified I'm going to nuke the wrong drive.

 

 

True Image

 

clone_004.png

 

Macromedia Reflect

 

ximg_599e009199af7.png.pagespeed.gp+jp+j

 

Expand  

+1 For TrueImage, I had a specific use case a few years ago where I had to clone a HDD to SSD (Usually I wouldn't do this) and it worked great.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This is the reason Microsoft stepped away from Aero for a more subtler transparency. Apple I believe had the perfect balance of transparency and readability, but not with this redesign in its current form. As for people who believe Windows has an 8-bit interface, well, at least you can read stuff.
    • who ever thought this looked good needs to rethink their design credentials.....
    • There's a few here upset Kamala Harris never got the Presidency! lol....
    • Yeah, he identified a whole lot of wasteful spending of US taxpayer money. What's wrong with that? Nothing, unless you had your fingers in the pie of course.
    • How to reduce the annoying Liquid Glass effects on iOS 26 by Aditya Tiwari Apple announced Liquid Glass at WWDC 2025 in all of its glory. It's a new glass-inspired design language from the iPhone-maker making its way to most of its software platforms, including iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS 26, tvOS 26, and watchOS 26. Apple markets Liquid Glass as a new translucent material that "behaves like glass in the real world. Its color is informed by surrounding content and intelligently adapts between light and dark environments." The Cupertino giant isn't wrong. The new glass-inspired design does bring a fresh coat of paint and some beautiful visuals to the iPhone and other Apple-made devices. However, as the dust from the mega arrival settles, people are starting to realize the current drawbacks of having too much glass on their device. There have been reports of users, including those at Neowin, experiencing readability issues, background separation issues, and trouble focusing on the content displayed on the screen due to its transparent nature. While these are small nuances on Apple's part that can be fixed without much hassle, it's degrading the initial experience of what the company calls its biggest visual upgrade since iOS 7. That said, there are some workarounds built into iOS 26 that will help you tone down the shortcomings. If you're running the iOS 25 Developer Beta 1 on your supported iPhone model, you can follow these steps to make things a little better: Go to the Settings app on your iPhone. Scroll down and tap on Accessibility > Display & Text Size. Next, you'll find two toggle options: Reduce Transparency and Increase Contrast. When you enable the Reduce Transparency toggle button, iOS 26 can "improve contrast by reducing transparency and blurs on some backgrounds to increase legibility." The other toggle, Increase Contrast, does what its name suggests. It can "increase color contrast between app foreground and background colors." Enabling each of these toggle buttons individually or simultaneously will have different effects on your iPhone's user interface. Control Center is being criticized for the extra transparency, making the UI look cluttered and difficult to focus. Here, the Reduce Transparency button adds a darker background to make the Control Center UI elements stand out. Liquid Glass transparency issues are also prevalent in the Notification Center and the navigation controls of various apps. In the image above, see how the text of the navigation buttons has become unreadable or hard to focus on with certain backgrounds. It's challenging to determine what can trigger such behavior, as one can have countless color combinations on their device. In the image below, this is how these buttons look when both Reduce Transparency and Increase Contrast are enabled. It's still a hit or miss depending on what colors you are dealing with. Part of the blame also goes to the fact that iOS 26 is still an early beta, and the change doesn't render as intended every time. You can also notice the difference in the look and feel of the Control Center when reduced transparency is turned on. On a side note, you can add the Reduce Transparency and Increase Contrast buttons in the Control Center for quicker access. That said, let's wait to see what changes Apple will implement as it continues to gather feedback through the beta program. Hopefully, the software will become more stable when the first public beta of iOS 26 arrives sometime in July. Interested users can try out the latest iPhone update through the developer beta program, noting that early builds might come with unexpected bugs and issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      greege earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      greege earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      LagFighterZ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      5i3zi1 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      547
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      230
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      166
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      119
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      91
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!