• 0

Are there any equivalent programs to Skype?


Question

I like how Skype has the ringing to alert of an incoming call, and I realize that most of the other programs like it (zoom, WebEx, etc) don't have that feature. I like Skype, but it has its share of minor bugs and annoyances that has me looking for something along the same lines as it. Does anything else exist that has the features I am looking for?

12 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
3 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I like how Skype has the ringing to alert of an incoming call, and I realize that most of the other programs like it (zoom, WebEx, etc) don't have that feature.

Uh, Zoom sure as hell does have that feature.  It's a terrible ringtone and sounds like a child's toy!

  • 0

Have you tried Teams yet? It's available for personal use now and is essentially the successor to Skype at this point.

 

Outside of that I think the usuals support ringing as well:

  • Facebook Messenger
  • Discord
  • Slack (haven't used the calling feature on Slack myself but I believe it supports ringing as well)

 

If none of those suit your needs then please let us know what other features you require from a suite and it should help us out to point you in the right direction :) 

  • 0
27 minutes ago, Dick Montage said:

Uh, Zoom sure as hell does have that feature.  It's a terrible ringtone and sounds like a child's toy!

I wasn't aware of that, how do I enable it?

28 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

Have you tried Teams yet? It's available for personal use now and is essentially the successor to Skype at this point.

 

Outside of that I think the usuals support ringing as well:

  • Facebook Messenger
  • Discord
  • Slack (haven't used the calling feature on Slack myself but I believe it supports ringing as well)

 

If none of those suit your needs then please let us know what other features you require from a suite and it should help us out to point you in the right direction :) 

I have not tried Teams, I forgot about that one, Facebook messenger would mean I have to have a Facebook account, and I don't see that happening! Does Discord and Slack do video chat? That is what I am after, sorry if I didn't make that clear.

  • 0
6 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I have not tried Teams, I forgot about that one, Facebook messenger would mean I have to have a Facebook account, and I don't see that happening! Does Discord and Slack do video chat? That is what I am after, sorry if I didn't make that clear.

Discord does video chat for sure. Slack I'm not sure if video is supported on a free tier server or not as when I was running a Slack server we had the calling feature disabled as it wasn't needed for our use case.

 

Here's a good question for clarification. Will these be group video chats or just individuals contacting you? If this isn't for a group then I'd rule out Slack as any slack use requires a group 'server' be setup.
Discord is closer to Teams and Skype where calls/video can be done on an individual or group/conference basis.

 

Sure Discord is gaming oriented but you don't HAVE to use that portion of it; it's still a great messenger app and has some good codecs for the audio/video calls.

 

edit: I think I'd recommend starting with trying Teams though as it has interconnectivity with Skype contacts now, I believe, so you may not even have to re-setup your friends list if it allows that to be carried over.

  • 0
1 minute ago, Brandon H said:

Discord does video chat for sure. Slack I'm not sure if video is supported on a free tier server or not as when I was running a Slack server we had the calling feature disabled as it wasn't needed for our use case.

 

Here's a good question for clarification. Will these be group video chats or just individuals contacting you? If this isn't for a group then I'd rule out Slack as any slack use requires a group 'server' be setup.
Discord is closer to Teams and Skype where calls/video can be done on an individual or group/conference basis.

 

Sure Discord is gaming oriented but you don't HAVE to use that portion of it; it's still a great messenger app and has some good codecs for the audio/video calls.

Individual use, maybe adding one other person (total of 3) but most of the time, just 1 other.

  • 0

gotta be honest. I haven't touched Zoom so I'm not sure what features/functionality it has. I know they finally caved and added E2E encryption by default but it still leaves a foul taste in my mouth that they thought they could get away without it at first earlier last year ...

  • 0
14 minutes ago, Dick Montage said:

If I am signed into Zoom and someone calls me, it just does it?

IDK, I have only used Zoom once, and it was a PITA to get the other person connected, it first put them in the waiting room and did not notify me until I got an email message telling me they were waiting, and then it took more time once they were in the meeting to get audio and video, it started with video no audio, then the video went away and it was just audio, then the stars aligned just right and I had audio and video!

@Brandon HI just checked Slack and it shows 1 on 1 video under the free plan.

  • 0
4 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

IDK, I have only used Zoom once, and it was a PITA to get the other person connected, it first put them in the waiting room and did not notify me until I got an email message telling me they were waiting, and then it took more time once they were in the meeting to get audio and video, it started with video no audio, then the video went away and it was just audio, then the stars aligned just right and I had audio and video!

If you wanna send me your Zoom id, I can try to call you?

 

  • 0
3 minutes ago, Dick Montage said:

If you wanna send me your Zoom id, I can try to call you?

 

Thanks for the offer, but I have to run and do some chores, but if you are on later, I hit you with a PM and we can try then.

  • 0

whatsapp, signal, telegram - AFAIK they all have mobile and desktop apps, they all have ringtones and all have video calling too.

 

i am not sure why you don't use one of those IMs instead of Zoom - which is more for conferencing clearly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!