How can I make my Web Server visible to the 'Outside World'?


Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

Apologies for the newbie question......

 

I've setup a Web Server and i can access it it through localhost/index.php?item=2&type=library

 

Now I have my own domain name aide199.co.uk through LCN and I want users to access my Web Server by using http://aide199.co.uk

 

How can I do this?

 

Thanks in advance

If you are certain you want to self-host from home, LCN will need to add your home ip address to its DNS to point the domain to you. If your ip address isn't static they probably won't do it.

 

I would strongly urge you to not put a home server online.

Someone else has advised me to create a free domain on no-ip.com which i have done myserver.ddns.net and forward my domain aide.co.uk to myserver.ddns.net

 

But I still can't get my head around how i make http://aide199.co.uk point to localhost/index.php?item=2&type=library

Use ngrok and be done with it.  
 

Otherwise, you need to open port 80 to the world if you want to host on your machine, set up your web server, point no-ip to your public ip, which is hopefully static else you have to run a service to keep it up to date if your router can’t. You sure that’s something you want to do? You are better off finding a cheap web host. If it’s just to test, see ngrok. 

Edited by adrynalyne

I just looked and LCN does hosting. Just get a basic site there. They will point your domain accordingly. If you can't figure out how to get this going, I doubt there is any likelihood of your home server being secure enough. Do the world a favor and don't run this from home.

4 minutes ago, Biscuits Brown said:

I just looked and LCN does hosting. Just get a basic site there. They will point your domain accordingly. If you can't figure out how to get this going, I doubt there is any likelihood of your home server being secure enough. Do the world a favor and don't run this from home.

Thanks, you just reminded me to close off outside connections to my NAS. I successfully set it up to allow Plex from the internet using ddns.info but I don't actually need it, and it is a giant security risk so I just set my Qnap to only allow connections from the LAN IP range.

On 04/04/2021 at 12:25, ady199 said:

Someone else has advised me to create a free domain on no-ip.com which i have done myserver.ddns.net and forward my domain aide.co.uk to myserver.ddns.net

 

But I still can't get my head around how i make http://aide199.co.uk point to localhost/index.php?item=2&type=library

you don't point to localhost, localhost is a term the computer identifies and redirects to itself.

If you've correctly setup the myserver.ddns.net , all you should need to do is to setup port forwarding on your home router such that all requests to Port 80 are redirected to your Computers LOCAL (intranet) IP. 

 

For a detailed answer check out: 

https://serverfault.com/questions/1058/how-do-i-set-up-a-web-server-out-of-my-home

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • finally [Taskbar] Taskbar customization just got easier. As we continue to make improvements to the Taskbar experience mentioned last month, we've introduced a dedicated Taskbar Size setting, making it simpler to find, understand, and personalize your ideal taskbar experience.
    • Let me get this straight... It was a web interface for Gmail, so if privacy at Google wasn't concerning enough you'd be going through two companies. And their big feature was the very thing that would make people consider dumping Gmail.
    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!