• 0

Best free anti-malware software?


Question

I have a premium version of Malwarebytes on my main PC and I am happy with it, but it is single license (lifetime) that I bought in a deal 9 years ago (lol) and now I want anti-malware for my laptop (HP Pavilion x360 m3 from 2017) but I don't want to pay for it, I don't want to commit to a monthly or yearly subscription for a machine I don't use regularly but I do want it to be protected with the best free one.

 

Right now I am trying bitdefender (recommended in 2020 on Reddit as being good after doing a Google search) but I wonder what experience our Neowin readers have?

 

Here's what they said:  

 

Here's the best free ones:

  • Kaspersky.com
  • BitDefender.com
  • McAfee
  • Panda

Some of the most annoying ones that constantly bug you and are full of baggage installs AVOID IMO:

  • Avast.com
  • AVG
  • Avira
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1406962-best-free-anti-malware-software/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Can we please quit with the arguing, it's clear that Windows Security in Windows 10 encompasses just like Control Panel does for Windows.

 

Also, I was not asking about the baked in solution. Windows native zip is also okay, but it is useless when it comes to .RAR extensions ;) 

  • 0

I have no idea why one would install a third-party anti-virus solution. in my experience, they are more trouble than they are worth and are very intrusive these days. I have used Windows's built-in solution for almost a decade now and it's fine. TBH I have had like one warning from a real-time AV scanner in about 15 years.

 

More importantly, please apply Windows security updates and browser updates in a timely matter and use an ad/content blocker (Firefox + uBlock Origin is the best combo).

  • 0

If they put a gun to my head and say "choose an AV other than Microsoft Defender," I'd choose BitDefender. For now. I am accustomed to changing them. I've been on different AVs before, like:

  • Norton Internet Security (that was before the era of Norton 360)
  • Symantec Antivirus (before the era of Symantec Endpoint Security)
  • Kaspersky Internet Security
  • BitDefender Internet Security
  • ESET NOD32
  • Microsoft Security Essentials
  • Comodo Internet Security
  • PC-cilin
  • ZoneAlarm

 

If they put a gun to my head and say "choose between AVG, Avast, Avira, and McAfee," I'd say "shoot!"

 

I wish the PC security industry moved on to 2nd-generation security software.

  • 0
3 minutes ago, Fleet Command said:

If they put a gun to my head and say "choose an AV other than Microsoft Defender," I'd choose BitDefender. For now. I am accustomed to changing them. I've been on different AVs before, like:

  • Norton Internet Security (that was before the era of Norton 360)
  • Symantec Antivirus (before the era of Symantec Endpoint Security)
  • Kaspersky Internet Security
  • BitDefender Internet Security
  • ESET NOD32
  • Microsoft Security Essentials
  • Comodo Internet Security
  • PC-cilin
  • ZoneAlarm

 

If they put a gun to my head and say "choose between AVG, Avast, Avira, and McAfee," I'd say "shoot!"

 

I wish the PC security industry moved on to 2nd-generation security software.

What is "2nd-generation security software"?

  • 0
1 minute ago, Superuser said:

What is "2nd-generation security software"?

Containerization-based security. Imagine if all apps run inside their own Docker container had no way of knowing what's inside the other container. A malware would run inside its own container and could infect all the nothing within.

 

Android and iOS use this model; that's why they don't have viruses like Adrozek. Their threat landscape is different.

  • 0
3 minutes ago, Fleet Command said:

Containerization-based security. Imagine if all apps run inside their own Docker container had no way of knowing what's inside the other container. A malware would run inside its own container and could infect all the nothing within.

 

Android and iOS use this model; that's why they don't have viruses like Adrozek. Their threat landscape is different.

 

Adrozek did require user involvement which can get you infected on any platform. LOL I believe Windows 10X is supposed to be somewhat container based. Does that also mean no built-in admin/root access like Android and iOS? That is the number one reason for malware infection but I don't want that taken away on Windows. TBH malware hasn't been much of a concern for me on any platform for many years now.

  • 0
36 minutes ago, Superuser said:

Adrozek did require user involvement which can get you infected on any platform.

I seriously thought Adrozek is Windows-specific. And Wikipedia agrees with me. If I am wrong though, please feel free to insert the name of another computer virus there. And can I see a source that says Adrozek is multi-platform, please? (Thanks in advance.) Anyway, the thing is, computer viruses alter the binaries of other apps. 2nd-generation security model stops that. As far as I am concerned, Bromium and Turbo.net were the only attempts (and feeble ones too) to bring a 2nd-gen security model to Windows.

Quote

I believe Windows 10X is supposed to be somewhat container based.

I hope so, although it is the "somewhat" part that frightens me. To be honest, I know zilch about Windows 10X.

  • 0
33 minutes ago, Fleet Command said:

I seriously thought Adrozek is Windows-specific. And Wikipedia agrees with me. If I am wrong though, please feel free to insert the name of another computer virus there. And can I see a source that says Adrozek is multi-platform, please?

I wasn't saying any platform was vulnerable to Adrozek but that it seemed to require some kind of USER INTERACTION. It doesn't matter what OS you are using if the user "clicks" on "OK". LOL

  • Like 1
  • 0

Hello,

Anti-virus and anti-malware software are actually the same thing.  They are marketing terms used to brand a product in order to promote it to a particular market segment.

 

Several years ago, I wrote a guide to evaluating anti-virus software on Reddit's r/sysadmin subreddit.  I have revised it a couple of times since then, mostly recently last month, and it can now be found on the Spiceworks IT community as one of their HOWTO's:  https://community.spiceworks.com/how_to/155722-evaluate-antivirus-software

 

Perhaps you will find it of use.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • 0
On 15/04/2021 at 06:56, Steven P. said:

Also, I was not asking about the baked in solution. Windows native zip is also okay, but it is useless when it comes to .RAR extensions ;) 

Respectfully, why not?  What you present isn't a fair analogy and shouldn't immediately discount built in solutions.  You were asking about free anti-malware, and MDA is free and absolutely protects against anti-malware.  Whether it has the full or additional features you desire is something that has not been disclosed. 

 

For all the arguing in this thread, the point is that many people (like me) use the Windows' built in solution - Microsoft Defender Antivirus - and it's good, and it's anti-malware.  If you want more, then what's that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!