Internal connection between two PCs seems to max at 50 MB/s


Recommended Posts

PC (wired)

  • On-board Realtek RTL8111H Gigabit NIC (2014 model)
  • Wired directly to a BT Smart Hub 1 802.11ac wireless router
  • Windows Settings shows a link speed of 1000/1000 Mbps

 

Server (wireless)

  • Addon XWP3000R 802.11ax wireless NIC
  • Latest Intel AX200 drivers (v22.40.0, dated March 2021)
  • Wirelessly connected to the BT Smart Hub 1 wireless router

  • Windows Settings shows a link speed of 866/866 Mbps
  • Appears to have full wireless signal strength

 

When I transfer files from the PC to the server, the speed varies between roughly 30 MB/s and 70 MB/s (very variable, even during the same transfer).

 

When I transfer files from the server to the PC, I get a constant 47 MB/s transfer speed. I was expecting (hoping?) for around 120 MB/s (Gigabit).

 

Any ideas?

Edited by Elliot B.
1 minute ago, Elliot B. said:

PC (wired)

  • On-board Realtek RTL8111H Gigabit NIC (2014 model)
  • Connected directly to a BT Smart Hub 802.11ac wireless router
  • Windows Settings shows a link speed of 1000/1000 Mbps

 

Server (wireless)

  • Addon XWP3000R 802.11ax wireless NIC
  • Latest Intel AX200 drivers (v22.40.0, dated March 2021)
  • Windows Settings shows a link speed of 866/866 Mbps
  • Appears to have full wireless signal strength

 

When I transfer files from the PC to the server, the speed varies between roughly 30 MB/s and 70 MB/s (very variable, even during the same transfer).

 

When I transfer files from the server to the PC, I get a constant 47 MB/s transfer speed. I was expecting (hoping?) for around 120 MB/s (Gigabit).

 

Any ideas?

You are getting what I would expect over WiFi. 

5 hours ago, Elliot B. said:

120 MB/s (Gigabit)

Even wired gig wouldn't give you that.. More like 113 to maybe 115.. 

 

Keep in mind there is overhead..  Even gig is more like low to mid 900's - 940ish I would say it best you could possible see..  Just like you don't see 100, or even 10..

 

Just some advice, would never run a "server" wireless.. Not like servers move about much ;)

 

This is good advice "Always do wired unless you can't"..  Unless the device is mobile, if it has a wired interface, you should do everything you can to wire it..

 

>Windows Settings shows a link speed of 866/866 Mbps

 

While that is a good PHY connection, real world is not close to that.. Best say 60% of that - normally more in the 50% range.. So lets call it 400ish - so 400/8 = 50MBps.. So yeah if your seeing 50ish over wireless 867 PHY.. that is good performance and expecting any more than that is pretty much dreaming..

 

This is pretty much pegging a 1gig connection

 

peg.png.0d02a2b03c08c00d56238fad15588348.png

 

That is s 2.something gig file.. pulling from my nas to my pc over 1gig wired..   You can see its pretty flat line at like 113MBps

 

Now here is the same file from the same nas to the same PC via 2.5gig connection.. So clearly the HDD and the SSD involved where not a bottle neck limiting it to 113..

 

I see upwards of 280MBps via this connection.. Quite possible someone streaming something off plex at the moment..

2gig.png.236ed7e2e3fa4c770686f23732ea9f6d.png

 

Oh yeah - 3 people streaming, movies they watching could be off the same volume I was pulling the test file from, etc..

 

stream.png.c844a2889467fc03080b10e865502dad.png

 

But yeah gig is going to be about 113MB.. If your seeing over 100MB I would see your normal..  Pretty much any sort of somewhat recent hardware should be able to do 100MBps over gig.. But 120.. No not really possible..

 

  • Thanks 1

read\write limitation?

do you have an Antivirus?

Cache disabled?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!