Microsoft should stop with this charade and make Windows 11 a paid upgrade


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

I’ll bet you 100 bucks via PayPal that they won’t. Wanna wager? 🙂

Then why require TPM then if you not going to use bitlocker? If I had the money I would make that bet. I have kids and they take up all the money.

TPM isn't used just for bitlocker.   I think people forget or don't know.   MS will post this in a blog at some point but other things like Windows Hello also use TPM.    There could be other security related features that take advantage of TPM.   Just wait and see what they say.  With all the noise being made about TPM they'll have to address it for sure.

My difficulty is that I have an old PC but it still works well and runs Windows 10 fine, I can still game in 1080p, I can still do everything I need to do on the internet and with MS Office.  I don't have a TPM module of any kind so Windows 11 is a no go for me.  

 

I would have preferred to stay on Windows 7 for another decade but it looks like I am left on Windows 10 and if they only support it for another year after Windows 11 comes around, I will either have to throw away a perfectly serviceable computer or put Linux on it.  

Just now, Batfink said:

...I will either have to throw away a perfectly serviceable computer or put Linux on it.  

If it's serviceable couldn't you put a TPM chip on it? Although Linux is also a perfectly viable option in my mind. ;)

3 minutes ago, Batfink said:

My difficulty is that I have an old PC but it still works well and runs Windows 10 fine, I can still game in 1080p, I can still do everything I need to do on the internet and with MS Office.  I don't have a TPM module of any kind so Windows 11 is a no go for me.  

 

I would have preferred to stay on Windows 7 for another decade but it looks like I am left on Windows 10 and if they only support it for another year after Windows 11 comes around, I will either have to throw away a perfectly serviceable computer or put Linux on it.  

Windows 10 will be supported til mid 2025

3 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

If it's serviceable couldn't you put a TPM chip on it? Although Linux is also a perfectly viable option in my mind. ;)

It's an X58 motherboard without a TPM header unfortunately and no BIOS support.  Linux absolutely is... I just have some struggles gaming with it.

 

3 minutes ago, cacoe said:

Windows 10 will be supported til mid 2025

That is good news, thanks Cacoe!

34 minutes ago, Gotenks98 said:

Then why require TPM then if you not going to use bitlocker? If I had the money I would make that bet. I have kids and they take up all the money.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/information-protection/tpm/tpm-fundamentals

 

Anything crypto related is sped up by offloading to hardware, vs software.

On 28/06/2021 at 04:54, Jim K said:

I'm holding off any real opinion until 11 is released with respect to system requirements as they can change between now and then.

 

However, I'm not sure what one thing has to do with the other...are you implying that if it were a paid upgrade they would drop this TPM "requirement"?  

 

 

That is exactly what I am saying.

 

Microsoft already that with its permission, OEMs can ship Windows 11 PCs without TPM.

 

"Upon approval from Microsoft, OEM systems for special purpose commercial systems, custom order, and customer systems with a custom image are not required to ship with a TPM support enabled."

 

Furthermore, Microsoft also said that Windows 11 can run on virtual machines without meeting the hardware requirements.

 

"while Microsoft recommends that all virtualized instances of the Windows 11 follow the same minimum hardware requirements as described in Section 1.2, the Windows 11 does not apply the hardware-compliance check for virtualized instances either during setup or upgrade."

 

https://download.microsoft.com/download/7/8/8/788bf5ab-0751-4928-a22c-dffdc23c27f2/Minimum Hardware Requirements for Windows 11.pdf

Quote

are you implying that if it were a paid upgrade they would drop this TPM "requirement"?  

 

4 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

That is exactly what I am saying.

I'm trying to think of how I can explain how wrong this idea is...I've literally sat here for at least 30 minutes trying several times to write up why this is wrong, but when the premise is this flimsy it makes any counter-argument difficult to put in to words. It's like trying to have a discussion with the argument being that the dinosaurs didn't exist. Where do you start?

 

I guess I'll start with a question. Could you please explain why you think that Microsoft would drop the TPM requirement if they charged money for the upgrade? I think you're going to say that by releasing the update for free they are losing out on money, and by forcing people to buy new hardware they will get money from the new licences. If that's the case, can you please provide me a breakdown of Microsoft's revenue at the moment, bearing in mind that Windows 11 isn't available yet and Windows 10 was offered as a free upgrade (i.e. used the same model being proposed for Windows 11)?

  • Like 3

A large amount of public opinion revolves around Windows 11 'is this really an upgrade', 'what's the point' & 'I'm not going to pay them money to move the start menu'.

 

 

The majority only leapt for Windows 10 as they were lead to believe the start menu was essential to run a few applications. Windows 11 isn't giving them anything they require

Someone said something interesting to me last night. They said "Wouldn't it be funny if these people started switching to Apple products?" ... its a good question If you have all these people that don't have a supported computer and will have to go out and buy a new computer for for Windows 11 anyway. They may feel burned and switch to a Mac... but little do they know how Apple Burns,.

  • Like 2
8 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Someone said something interesting to me last night. They said "Wouldn't it be funny if these people started switching to Apple products?" ... its a good question If you have all these people that don't have a supported computer and will have to go out and buy a new computer for for Windows 11 anyway. They may feel burned and switch to a Mac... but little do they know how Apple Burns,.

Yeah. If they think the new changes are unreasonable, wait until they get a load of Apple. 

  • Like 2
13 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

Yeah. If they think the new changes are unreasonable, wait until they get a load of Apple. 

Had a customer back in 2011 buy a MacBook Pro and an iMac 2017 inch. By 2013 he was selling them to me at a VERY VERY VEY steep discount ($200 for a fully loaded 2011 27 inch i7 iMac) . ... he just said make an offer and I did...

 

Fast forward last month. They went to replace one of their 2 AIO windows machines, The new one came to my office but the fan sounded HORRIBLE .. so they returned it. 1 week later they informed me they got one of the new iMacs. I asked if it was the M1 he said "it was the newest they had"

 

So there may be a highly discounted M1 iMac in my future.

  • Like 2
On 28/06/2021 at 12:56, Batfink said:

My difficulty is that I have an old PC but it still works well and runs Windows 10 fine, I can still game in 1080p, I can still do everything I need to do on the internet and with MS Office.  I don't have a TPM module of any kind so Windows 11 is a no go for me.  

 

I would have preferred to stay on Windows 7 for another decade but it looks like I am left on Windows 10 and if they only support it for another year after Windows 11 comes around, I will either have to throw away a perfectly serviceable computer or put Linux on it.  

Same situation here with a couple old desktops. 1 has already been switched to Linux although it ran Windows 10 just fine and have been debating about doing the same with the other one. Linux is just so much easier to manage, update and maintain compared to Windows, IMO, that I have really begun to hate on Windows again. It took me a couple years to finally even begin to stomach Windows 10 and although I do some what like Windows 10, the whole Windows thing is just an irritation to me anymore.

 

On wife's computer right now and it's a relatively newer machine but haven't bothered to check if it can run Windows 11 yet. Have no real desire to even look either. Gotten frustrated enough on this thing that I've threatened to put Linux on it and she actually said ok a few days ago, but I haven't yet. 

 

As far as making people pay for the upgrade, I see that as ridiculous after last upgrade was free. People would surely complain about that.

3 hours ago, Nick H. said:

 

I'm trying to think of how I can explain how wrong this idea is...I've literally sat here for at least 30 minutes trying several times to write up why this is wrong, but when the premise is this flimsy it makes any counter-argument difficult to put in to words. It's like trying to have a discussion with the argument being that the dinosaurs didn't exist. Where do you start?

 

I guess I'll start with a question. Could you please explain why you think that Microsoft would drop the TPM requirement if they charged money for the upgrade? I think you're going to say that by releasing the update for free they are losing out on money, and by forcing people to buy new hardware they will get money from the new licences. If that's the case, can you please provide me a breakdown of Microsoft's revenue at the moment, bearing in mind that Windows 11 isn't available yet and Windows 10 was offered as a free upgrade (i.e. used the same model being proposed for Windows 11)?

I am not an accountant.

16 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

I am not an accountant.

That’s not an excuse to not do some homework before inventing a conspiracy theory you want others to buy into. 

  • Like 2
18 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

That’s not an excuse to not do some homework before inventing a conspiracy theory you want others to buy into. 

Do you want me to hire an accountant?

Edited by Mockingbird
28 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

I am not an accountant.

I didn't say that you were. And neither am I, but the numbers are out there. From one site I have seen that Microsoft's revenue from operating systems is less than 10% of their total. It's not their money maker.

 

For people that use Windows, Windows 10 accounts for just under 80% of that usage. Windows 8/8.1 usage is just over 4.5%. A large reason for that migration is that the end user didn't need to do anything. The update was free, and in most cases if the computer ran Windows 8 it would run Windows 10. But for a moment let's assume that it hadn't been the case. Let's assume Microsoft had done what they are doing with Windows 11, and new hardware needed to be bought in order to run Windows 10. Do you think the marketshare would still be 80%?

The answer is that it wouldn't. And the reason is that for the average user, they don't care about being on the latest operating system. But there was a free update and they didn't need to do anything, so they updated. So now, when we take a look at Windows 11, let's think about what the average user is going to do. They are going to be offered an update for free, then they are going to be told that their computer doesn't support it. Are they going to go and buy a new computer? No, they are going to stick with their current computer because it is working perfectly fine on Windows 10 and it is still receiving security updates.

 

I'm willing to bet that Microsoft are well aware of this. They know that the adoption rate won't be as quick as it was with Windows 10 because of their TPM requirement, and they are going to be ok with that. Why are they going to be ok with that? Because they are looking ahead to when people choose to buy a new computer of their own free will, and that new computer will have Windows 11 installed, with the TPM installed and turned on. Why will they want that? For security, which if they are to be believed is their focus. It's a slow-burn tactic to improve overall security down the line.

 

Again, the TPM requirement being a tactic to get money from people is ludicrous.

On 26/06/2021 at 08:25, Mockingbird said:

I get it, Microsoft wants to make money.

 

This new system requirements to get people to buy new PCs is ridiculous.

 

Microsoft should drop this charade and make Windows 11 a paid upgrade.

I think you don't entirely understand the meaning of the word 'charade'.  In this context, it doesn't make sense.  Having higher system requirements isn't a charade, it's just more stringent requirements for security purposes. Plus, why would those requirements change if the OS was sold instead of being offered as a free upgrade? You have some real logic issues with your argument.

On 26/06/2021 at 12:20, Mockingbird said:

1. Certified Windows 10 PCs are required to have TPM, but not necessary turned on be default.

 

2. Even if the processor has built in TPM, it doesn't mean that the motherboard supports the feature or that it can be turned on.

 

3. Even if TPM is present and can be turned on, it might be disabled by default, and the layman would have trouble turning it on.

 

 

To answer your comments, in order:

 

1.  TPM - in any form - originated in servers - not desktops.  (It is part of the same set of features that gave us EFI - and later, UEFI.)  Who brought it to desktops first?  It wasn't Microsoft - but Apple.

2.  TPM could be implemented in either hardware, or software.  (As I pointed out above, only servers, and Apple hardware, made it mandatory.)

3.  TPM was, in fact, heavily resisted and protested against - except for servers.  (Even Apple caught flack for insisting on TPM - and not just from the "Hackintosh" community.)  That is why it was not mandatory, and ALSO why it was disabled by default - which remains the case to today - outside of servers and Apple.

 

If you are handy with a screwdriver - and can read - you can swap in a motherboard/CPU combo that is Windows 11-ready - right now (once the parts arrive).  MicroCenter has several such bundles actually in stock at most locations; my own preference is based on a Core i7 and 32 GB of DDR4, and costs $920USD (including tax).  There are two MicroCenter locations near me (Washington, DC area) - both have the items in stock.

  • Facepalm 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!