Microsoft should stop with this charade and make Windows 11 a paid upgrade


Recommended Posts

It's telling that you seem to have chosen to not respond to my post about why your theory doesn't make sense. But if you want to continue with this conspiracy then so be it, just don't expect others to go along with it.

Alright, lets say they made it a paid upgrade. Now what? Are you able to install it on any computer you want, or you now going to have customers who dropped cold hard cash on an OS upgrade they are unable to install because their CPU is not supported?

  • Like 2
On 26/06/2021 at 10:45, adrynalyne said:

This doesn’t even make sense. 

I second that.

Nonsense post.

Seems people were just born today. Software always have a hardware requirement. (win95, 2k, XP, 7, ...heck Linux too! ).

Can't expect to have new software on 5+ machines. It's not like Windows 11 will be the go-to tomorrow

10 hours ago, Nick H. said:

It's telling that you seem to have chosen to not respond to my post about why your theory doesn't make sense. But if you want to continue with this conspiracy then so be it, just don't expect others to go along with it.

That's because I am having trouble figuring out what you are really trying to say.

 

I guess that you are implying that if Windows 10 isn't a free update, nobody would pay to upgrade to Windows 10.

 

This is certainly false. While many would not pay to upgrade to Windows 10, some definitely would.

10 hours ago, warwagon said:

Alright, lets say they made it a paid upgrade. Now what? Are you able to install it on any computer you want, or you now going to have customers who dropped cold hard cash on an OS upgrade they are unable to install because their CPU is not supported?

Except that Microsoft allow people to run Windows 11 Dev on their PCs even though their PCs have unsupported processors, so it's clear that having unsupported processors don't preclude the PCs from running Windows 11.

 

Can you truly say that Windows 11 would run better on the Coffee Lake 2C/2T Celeron G4900T (which Windows 11 supports) than on the Kaby Lake 4C/8T Core i7-7700K (which Windows 11 doesn't support)?

21 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Except that Microsoft allow people to run Windows 11 Dev on their PCs even though their PCs have unsupported processors, so it's clear that having unsupported processors don't preclude the PCs from running Windows 11.

 

Can you truly say that Windows 11 would run better on the Coffee Lake 2C/2T Celeron G4900T (which Windows 11 supports) than on the Kaby Lake 4C/8T Core i7-7700K (which Windows 11 doesn't support)?

I don't disagree and I think it should run on everything windows 10 runs on. But I think even though you can install it on old hardware on the dev, once it gets released and gets locked down (unless MS changes their mind) it would ###### consumers off who purchase windows 11 for their current computer and then find out they can't install it because their processor isn't supported.

I know a lot of People are saying it's a free upgrade with the right hardware, but most seem to have forgotten Windows 10 was not a free upgrade. Like Windows 10, 11 is free as long as you give up your privacy. 11 is not free, it's like 10.

15 minutes ago, NinjaGinger said:

I know a lot of People are saying it's a free upgrade with the right hardware, but most seem to have forgotten Windows 10 was not a free upgrade. Like Windows 10, 11 is free as long as you give up your privacy. 11 is not free, it's like 10.

Ah this old chestnut. 

5 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

That's because I am having trouble figuring out what you are really trying to say.

 

I guess that you are implying that if Windows 10 isn't a free update, nobody would pay to upgrade to Windows 10.

 

This is certainly false. While many would not pay to upgrade to Windows 10, some definitely would.

I had to go and re-read my own post, because I couldn't understand how you got that from what I wrote. I didn't say that no one would pay for it. I am saying that the update to Windows 10 saw a high adoption because it was free and the customer didn't have to do anything special like buy a new computer. If it had cost money, or if people needed to buy a new computer, the adoption rate would have been lower and most people would have stuck with Windows 8 and Windows 7 because it worked for them.

 

Windows 11 will not see the same adoption rate as Windows 10 because there are going to be many people that don't meet the requirements and they will not buy a new computer just to have the latest operating system. They will be content staying with Windows 10. The same result would happen if you removed the TPM requirements but made it a paid upgrade. Microsoft know this and it doesn't bother them because they are not trying to get everyone to buy a new computer to run Windows 11 when it releases. Instead, when people inevitably buy a new computer later on that computer will have TPM enabled which will make it more secure.

 

If you still don't understand then perhaps someone else can do a better job of explaining it. There seem to be quite a few people that understood what I was saying so perhaps they can help. But I also appreciate that you seem to want to believe that Microsoft are doing this as some sort of money-making ploy, and if you refuse to look at all the evidence to the contrary there's not a lot anyone can do to convince you otherwise. :/

2 hours ago, Steven P. said:

I'd happily pay $199 for them to shut off all the telemetry crap and creepy tracking in Windows.

And to think people paid for Windows 7, which also had telemetry. 

6 minutes ago, revodo said:

No where near as bad as Windows 8 / 10, and you know that. Also, very few people knew about that back in the Windows 7 era.

Can you specifically identify what its sending? An example? Anything at all?

 

This is all too often a criticism of MS, but I've yet to see anyone pull up what the data actually is.

 

 

6 hours ago, Nick H. said:

I had to go and re-read my own post, because I couldn't understand how you got that from what I wrote. I didn't say that no one would pay for it. I am saying that the update to Windows 10 saw a high adoption because it was free and the customer didn't have to do anything special like buy a new computer. If it had cost money, or if people needed to buy a new computer, the adoption rate would have been lower and most people would have stuck with Windows 8 and Windows 7 because it worked for them.

Could you get to the point?

 

Okay, so some people wouldn't upgrade. So what?

 

6 hours ago, Nick H. said:

Windows 11 will not see the same adoption rate as Windows 10 because there are going to be many people that don't meet the requirements and they will not buy a new computer just to have the latest operating system.

That's just stating the obvious.

 

6 hours ago, Nick H. said:

The same result would happen if you removed the TPM requirements but made it a paid upgrade. Microsoft know this and it doesn't bother them because they are not trying to get everyone to buy a new computer to run Windows 11 when it releases. Instead, when people inevitably buy a new computer later on that computer will have TPM enabled which will make it more secure.

First, the hardware restrictions is not just TPM. There are also processor restrictions. Microsoft doesn't allow any processors older than Coffee Lake or Zen+ to run Windows 11.

 

Second, if Windows 11 is a paid upgrade, why would prevent people from upgrading their existing PCs to Windows 11?

 

Why would it matter if people are running Windows 11 on Skylake and without TPM or whatever so as long as Microsoft makes $?

4 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Could you get to the point?

 

Okay, so some people wouldn't upgrade. So what?

 

That's just stating the obvious.

 

First, the hardware restrictions is not just TPM. There are also processor restrictions. Microsoft doesn't allow any processors older than Coffee Lake or Zen+ to run Windows 11.

 

Second, if Windows 11 is a paid upgrade, why would prevent people from upgrading their existing PCs to Windows 11?

 

Why would it matter if people are running Windows 11 on Skylake and without TPM or whatever so as long as Microsoft makes $?

Support calls due to performance problems for one.

http://borec.ch/the-potential-performance-impact-of-device-guard-hvci/

10 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

Support calls due to performance problems for one.

http://borec.ch/the-potential-performance-impact-of-device-guard-hvci/

That's not even a new feature.

 

It's already in Windows 10.

1 minute ago, Mockingbird said:

That's not even a new feature.

 

It's already in Windows 10.

And turned off by default.

 

Not to mention, it is being heavily encouraged in Windows 11.

I never said it was a new feature.

13 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Could you get to the point?

*Sigh* Ok: You're wrong, and the conspiracy is a daft one. That's the long and short of it.

Quote

Second, if Windows 11 is a paid upgrade, why would prevent people from upgrading their existing PCs to Windows 11?

It wouldn't prevent people from upgrading to Windows 11. Most just wouldn't choose to do it. Unlike tech enthusiasts, your average person doesn't care about having the latest OS, and if it will cost them money to do so they'll just wait until they get a new computer.

Quote

Why would it matter if people are running Windows 11 on Skylake and without TPM or whatever so as long as Microsoft makes $?

You're focused on the idea that Microsoft is doing it to make money. That's not why the requirements are there.

  • Like 2
Just now, adrynalyne said:

And turned off by default.

 

Not to mention, it is being heavily encouraged in Windows 11.

I never said it was a new feature.

Turn it or or turn it off. Whatever. There is a switch.

1 minute ago, Nick H. said:

Most just wouldn't choose to do it. Unlike tech enthusiasts, your average person doesn't care about having the latest OS, and if it will cost them money to do so they'll just wait until they get a new computer.

A lot of them don't even know what version of Windows they already have

 

Me : What version of Windows do you have

Them : I think I have windows 10

.... I log in ...

 

Me  ... You have window 7.

  • Like 2
1 minute ago, Mockingbird said:

Turn it or or turn it off. Whatever. There is a switch.

And that is exactly where you lost the plot.

 

MS is heavily emphasizing security. They don't want people to need to turn it off for performance issues, it is counterproductive.

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

It wouldn't prevent people from upgrading to Windows 11. Most just wouldn't choose to do it. Unlike tech enthusiasts, your average person doesn't care about having the latest OS, and if it will cost them money to do so they'll just wait until they get a new computer.

...and why is this any relevant? The option is there. It doesn't matter if they upgrade or not.

 

4 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

 

You're focused on the idea that Microsoft is doing it to make money. That's not why the requirements are there.

Okay, so why is it there?

3 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

Precisely!

It's funny, they always ask me "How can I tell".

 

in my mind i'm always thinking to my self "Just look at the god damn screen" ... thinking everyone can tell just by looking at the UI like we can.

1 minute ago, Mockingbird said:

...and why is this any relevant? The option is there. It doesn't matter if they upgrade or not.

 

Okay, so why is it there?

Its been explained. You are thick. I am done.

 

Get that last word in buddy, you will need it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.1 stable launch looms as Linus Torvalds releases the final release candidate by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds has just released what’s expected to be the final release candidate of Linux 7.1, rc7. The Linux founder said that this RC is not small, but smaller than recent releases, which is a good sign because he expects the stable version to drop next week if things continue on this trajectory. Linux kernels see a merge window for the first two weeks of their life, where developers add new features, then there are about seven or eight weeks of release candidates before the stable version. Typically, there are seven release candidates, but if more time is needed, then an eighth release candidate is released too. This week’s RC’s biggest area of fixes was for GPUs, with networking just behind. Torvalds said that the rest of the release was “pretty random and spread out” with some architecture fixes, driver fixes, filesystem improvements, and build fixes for more unusual configs. In terms of specific pieces of hardware receiving improvements in this update, we had more AMD Zen6 models supported and fixes for AMD SDMA 7.1 and GFX11. Hardware that got improvements includes Lenovo laptops, HONOR laptops, and MSI laptops. Here are the changelogs for those: ASoC: amd: acp: Add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15ASH11 Input: atkbd - add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Air 14 (83QK) Input: atkbd - skip deactivate for HONOR BCC-N's internal keyboard ASoC: amd: yc: Add MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG to quirk table ASoC: amd: yc: Enable internal mic on MSI Bravo 17 C7VF When the stable Linux 7.1 is released, it will be up to distribution maintainers, such as Canonical and Red Hat, to release the update to their users via the update manager. Some versions of Linux will get it before others, and some will never get it at all. Fedora and Arch-based distros will be among the first to get it, though. If you don’t get it, the security fixes will be backported to your system’s kernel, so you won’t be at risk, but you won’t get newer hardware support, which is fine if your computer works now.
    • Ideally, the algorithm is smart enough to see the real sender ID and non-spoofed address to block it. Ideally.
    • Helium Browser 0.13.1.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.1.1 changelog: Helium Windows e13ddd4 update: helium 0.13.1.1 (#285) 77ee94b helium/windows: winsparkle updater (built-in auto-update support on Windows) e501e98 helium/windows: refresh updater patches for m149 008faee helium/win: move versioning patches to separate file e114701 helium/updater: implement system install update notifications c9e3cda helium/winsparkle: verboser errors b8f787c helium/windows: more version migrations cd376ed ci: sign update helper with different description 5d2383a build: wire up winsparkle envs 3ff28ff helium/updater: init ca58f6f helium/change-branding: use helium version in more internal places 75b2625 .gitignore: add resources/generated abe78f2 downloads: add winsparkle dep 4ed4429 build: build mini_installer again fabf8e9 update: helium 0.13.1.1 Helium-Chromium 5bf45fed merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.53 (#1857) 3bbe6a3c revision: reset to 1 e3525bb6 helium/zen: reorder patch hunks d48bc496 deps: update ublock to 1.71.0 (#1875) d4e58802 helium/ui: redesign infobar, optimize and rename zen (#1868) c20175cf helium/ui/infobar: redesign, draw proper borders, fix webview relations e8a1bfc1 helium/zen: rename Zen to Frameless in UI, remove feature gates bf560c6a helium/layout: optimize zen top reveal, move out of experiment dir 34ef5f26 patches/brave/chrome-importer: remove os_crypt-related dead code 99cef46c helium/ui: clean up patches, fix accidental string OS gates 5b7dd06c devutils/i18n: add clean command (#1869) 7a32267e helium/updater: add win scaffolding, tighten arch conditions (#1866) d856d800 ci: complete cirrus port to github actions (#1867) c362740d patches: update for chromium 149.0.7827.53 b8a66095 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.53 a3a5471d Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.53 c6a41202 helium/updates: decouple update url from helium services + reformat (#1827) 94344c47 Update to Chromium 148.0.7778.215 95f6fe1c Port CirrusCI jobs to github actions (#3776) Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!