Recommended Posts

So I was attempting to reserve DHCP address' for my PoE camera's, and according to the router when I filter the network map to just ethernet, I have a Galaxy-Tab-A-8 connected... well that tablet is my nieces, and it is connected via WiFi, no way to connect it to ethernet ,and it also appears listed as connected via WiFi... Also only one of my PoE camera's shows up,  yet they are both connected and I am viewing them live right now, so I am not sure how it can not be connected.

A map of where mac address are connected from, be it ethernet or wifi doesn't always work correctly - especially on some soho wifi router..

 

You could have a loop, where macs are showing up to the router via its ethernet ports.  A loop could explain some of the really slow performance you were seeing.  Did you ever check your gig speed with iperf?  Or was that someone else?

 

Can you map out how you have everything connected?

 

Your only wifi is on the router, and not some other AP as well? You don't have multiple ports from your switch or other AP connecting into your router?

 

What does where your router think some mac is connected via wireless or wired have to do with setting a dhcp reservation?

3 hours ago, BudMan said:

A map of where mac address are connected from, be it ethernet or wifi doesn't always work correctly - especially on some soho wifi router..

 

You could have a loop, where macs are showing up to the router via its ethernet ports.  A loop could explain some of the really slow performance you were seeing.  Did you ever check your gig speed with iperf?  Or was that someone else?

 

Can you map out how you have everything connected?

 

Your only wifi is on the router, and not some other AP as well? You don't have multiple ports from your switch or other AP connecting into your router?

 

What does where your router think some mac is connected via wireless or wired have to do with setting a dhcp reservation?

No AP's, there is a total of 2 switches plus the PoE one. 1 switch is only being used on BIL PC so he can control his UPS (apparently it is a network/rack grade UPS)

The Mac address issue came up when I was trying to find my cameras, it has nothing to do with DHCP reservation it was simply an oddity that I noticed.

I have not gotten a chance to run iperf yet.

Network.png.d3e8ec669f57b6813d1d66bb9d94eaf7.png

Yeah I don't see how you could have a loop there.. Unless your switches are connected together?  Does any of your say nas/desktops have both wireless and wired interfaces? Or say your laptops/desktop at some point have been wired and wireless at the same time and doing any sort of bridging?

 

Are you running just 1 SSID?  Or do you have say a guest network setup on the wireless?

 

I would guess just some bug/issue/glitch in your routers presentation of where the devices are via mac.  Since they just bridge the wifi to the lan ports its possible its just confused to where the mac address was.

4 hours ago, BudMan said:

Yeah I don't see how you could have a loop there.. Unless your switches are connected together?  Does any of your say nas/desktops have both wireless and wired interfaces? Or say your laptops/desktop at some point have been wired and wireless at the same time and doing any sort of bridging?

 

Are you running just 1 SSID?  Or do you have say a guest network setup on the wireless?

 

I would guess just some bug/issue/glitch in your routers presentation of where the devices are via mac.  Since they just bridge the wifi to the lan ports its possible its just confused to where the mac address was.

We have 2 SSID's one for the 2.4 and one for the 5ghz. No guest network enabled. All 3 of the desktops have the ability to run WiFi, but they are not enabled. Two of he switches are located beside the router, the third is on the back wall next to the other desktop, and I have physically traced the wires and they are all terminate at the router.

Hello,

 

Just to check, do you have any devices on your wireless network which have the option to randomize their MAC address each time they connect?

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

15 hours ago, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

Just to check, do you have any devices on your wireless network which have the option to randomize their MAC address each time they connect?

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

I have no idea, I don't think that it sounds like anything I have ever heard of.

Yeah random mac is very common these days - mostly in mobile devices.  I personally think its solution looking for a problem.. If your that worried about xyz tracking you while your connecting to some network - just don't connect to that network ;) vs creating random mac addresses.. Its a headache for sure for anyone trying to manage their own network while some iphone wants to change its mac every time it connects..

 

Not sure why your router would place this mac - be it random or not on ethernet side vs wifi side..  And the odds of even a random mac produced by say a phone - the odds of it matching up with another mac that was on your wired side are just astronomical.. The random macs are normally always some unregistered mac, the first 3 numbers of any mac are registered to company xyz, etc.  The randoms I have seen are always start with numbers that have not been registered so them matching up to some known device on our wired seems a bit out there for sure.

 

Unless you continue to see this sort of issue where devices are being seen on wired when they are wireless - I would just chalk it up to a glitch/bug/whatever in the routers code placing this mac on this network in its reporting..   If you do notice it more and more - then yeah I would investigate to "why"  just incase you have something that is bridging your wireless to to your wired network that you are not aware of.

10 hours ago, BudMan said:

Yeah random mac is very common these days - mostly in mobile devices.  I personally think its solution looking for a problem.. If your that worried about xyz tracking you while your connecting to some network - just don't connect to that network ;) vs creating random mac addresses.. Its a headache for sure for anyone trying to manage their own network while some iphone wants to change its mac every time it connects..

 

Not sure why your router would place this mac - be it random or not on ethernet side vs wifi side..  And the odds of even a random mac produced by say a phone - the odds of it matching up with another mac that was on your wired side are just astronomical.. The random macs are normally always some unregistered mac, the first 3 numbers of any mac are registered to company xyz, etc.  The randoms I have seen are always start with numbers that have not been registered so them matching up to some known device on our wired seems a bit out there for sure.

 

Unless you continue to see this sort of issue where devices are being seen on wired when they are wireless - I would just chalk it up to a glitch/bug/whatever in the routers code placing this mac on this network in its reporting..   If you do notice it more and more - then yeah I would investigate to "why"  just incase you have something that is bridging your wireless to to your wired network that you are not aware of.

I'll keep an eye on the network and see if this issue persists. Thanks for the help!

  • jnelsoninjax locked this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!