Windows 11 vs. past/present vulnerabilities


Recommended Posts

This is a serious question because I really don't know. Not looking to OS bash. Wanting technical answers. 

 

What past/present vulnerabilities would've been stopped dead in their tracks by a TPM, Secureboot and the explicit cpu requirements for Win11?

Edited by JustGeorge

I don't think anyone knows 100% so I'll through these out as speculation. TPM and secure boot would be a good block against rootkit based infection so requiring these could make a system more secure.  As for CPU generation, the common thought is it has something to do with spectre/meltdown remediations but who knows. 

Well, not directly because of TPM, but if you have a TPM activated you are more likely than not to use Bitlocker drive encryption, which means no problem of data leaks if your laptop or PC gets stolen.

8 minutes ago, Tantawi said:

Well, not directly because of TPM, but if you have a TPM activated you are more likely than not to use Bitlocker drive encryption, which means no problem of data leaks if your laptop or PC gets stolen.

In that case make TPM a requirement if you want to use that feature, instead of forcing everyone to have it.

  • Like 2
12 minutes ago, warwagon said:

In that case make TPM a requirement if you want to use that feature, instead of forcing everyone to have it.

But it is available in all PCs/motherboards shipped since 2015... and what is the percentage of people caring to enable/use it? not much I'd say outside the business environments (heck, believe it or not, even some multi billion $$ companies' IT departments don't bother to encrypt their employees laptops) 

I think it is a step in the right direction, IMHO.

5 hours ago, Tantawi said:

But it is available in all PCs/motherboards shipped since 2015... and what is the percentage of people caring to enable/use it? not much I'd say outside the business environments (heck, believe it or not, even some multi billion $$ companies' IT departments don't bother to encrypt their employees laptops) 

I think it is a step in the right direction, IMHO.

stuck with perfectly fine i7 5930/X99 motherboard with TPM 1.3 Connector :(

 

 

36 minutes ago, JustGeorge said:

What about ransomware? Any additional defenses against that scourge?

Partially, see: https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2017/06/29/windows-10-platform-resilience-against-the-petya-ransomware-attack/?source=mmpc where Secure Boot can help stop the encryption process if the computer rebooted shortly after infection. Plus other measures.

And while such protection is totally possible to have with Windows 10, the keyword here is to "enforce it" with Windows 11.

  • Like 2

Hello,

A couple of attack styles come to mind:

  • Some of the initial round of speculative execution attacks, i.e., first generation of Spectre and Meltdown.
  • malicious software that infects firmware, such as Mebromi and perhaps even Lojax.

Please keep in mind this is strictly off the top of my head.  I was thinking more about types of attacks that might be blocked a completely working set of TPM + SecureBoot + modern processors with fully-patched microcode.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

When it comes to the topic of TPM and Windows everyone talks about bitlocker, but I'm pretty sure that's not the only thing Windows uses/needs TPM for.   Maybe someone should make a detailed list, if MS doesn't have one already.  

1 hour ago, George P said:

When it comes to the topic of TPM and Windows everyone talks about bitlocker, but I'm pretty sure that's not the only thing Windows uses/needs TPM for.   Maybe someone should make a detailed list, if MS doesn't have one already.  

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/information-protection/tpm/trusted-platform-module-overview#practical-applications

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • LOL. Can't even quote and edit a comment correctly. Figures you're a Linux user.
    • I have disabled it, but the app is still taking space. I have a Mac and it is only possible to disable Ai on that, but I think that bit does get rid of the AI components after a while. What we are told is that we agree to all this when we use the devices as it is in the end user agreements, their software, they can do what they like. I doubt that any bill will happen in the U.S, the government there are in league with big tech firms. The E.U maybe, they seem to have some guts when it comes to tech companies. The U.K is not in the E.U, but some things still affect us. Our government is as gutless when it comes to tech companies as the U.s government.
    • WebChangeMonitor 26.06 by Razvan Serea Monitors allows you to quickly check a number of web pages and tracks changes based on the content of the web pages. Allows to monitor several protocols, including HTTP and HTTPS. Allows to view and record differences. Available for Win7/10, Linux and others. WebChangeMonitor features: Allows monitoring of web pages and informs about content changes Indication of states of currently monitored items in the tool and taskbar Reporting as sound and/or email as well as log file or HTML log Several configuration / filter options Support all protocols, e.g. http, https Multi-threaded, running in the background Bulk-import and bulk-export of items (from/to CSV) to monitor Export of results to CSV file for further processing Allows running command on items states and/or showing diff (changes) of content with preferred diff-tool ...and many more! Open Source (C++, wxWidgets) Cross platform for Windows (7/10), Linux, RPi and Mac (if self-compiled) WebChangeMonitor 26.06 release notes: Release 26.06 brings mostly s but updates the underlying core infrastructure. A major compiler is used for both x86/x64 and WoA64 architectures. This also means that all core libraries are re-compiled accordingly which required some changes in the build scripts. One of the core libraries (cURL) has been updated to address vulnerabilities and a nasty linker error that was causing the need for a dedicated patch which could now be eliminated. Download: WebChangeMonitor 64-bit | Setup 64-bit | ~10.0 MB (Open Source) Download: WebChangeMonitor 32-bit | Setup 32-bit View: WebChangeMonitor Website | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      257
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!