Windows 11 vs. past/present vulnerabilities


Recommended Posts

This is a serious question because I really don't know. Not looking to OS bash. Wanting technical answers. 

 

What past/present vulnerabilities would've been stopped dead in their tracks by a TPM, Secureboot and the explicit cpu requirements for Win11?

Edited by JustGeorge

I don't think anyone knows 100% so I'll through these out as speculation. TPM and secure boot would be a good block against rootkit based infection so requiring these could make a system more secure.  As for CPU generation, the common thought is it has something to do with spectre/meltdown remediations but who knows. 

Well, not directly because of TPM, but if you have a TPM activated you are more likely than not to use Bitlocker drive encryption, which means no problem of data leaks if your laptop or PC gets stolen.

8 minutes ago, Tantawi said:

Well, not directly because of TPM, but if you have a TPM activated you are more likely than not to use Bitlocker drive encryption, which means no problem of data leaks if your laptop or PC gets stolen.

In that case make TPM a requirement if you want to use that feature, instead of forcing everyone to have it.

  • Like 2
12 minutes ago, warwagon said:

In that case make TPM a requirement if you want to use that feature, instead of forcing everyone to have it.

But it is available in all PCs/motherboards shipped since 2015... and what is the percentage of people caring to enable/use it? not much I'd say outside the business environments (heck, believe it or not, even some multi billion $$ companies' IT departments don't bother to encrypt their employees laptops) 

I think it is a step in the right direction, IMHO.

5 hours ago, Tantawi said:

But it is available in all PCs/motherboards shipped since 2015... and what is the percentage of people caring to enable/use it? not much I'd say outside the business environments (heck, believe it or not, even some multi billion $$ companies' IT departments don't bother to encrypt their employees laptops) 

I think it is a step in the right direction, IMHO.

stuck with perfectly fine i7 5930/X99 motherboard with TPM 1.3 Connector :(

 

 

36 minutes ago, JustGeorge said:

What about ransomware? Any additional defenses against that scourge?

Partially, see: https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2017/06/29/windows-10-platform-resilience-against-the-petya-ransomware-attack/?source=mmpc where Secure Boot can help stop the encryption process if the computer rebooted shortly after infection. Plus other measures.

And while such protection is totally possible to have with Windows 10, the keyword here is to "enforce it" with Windows 11.

  • Like 2

Hello,

A couple of attack styles come to mind:

  • Some of the initial round of speculative execution attacks, i.e., first generation of Spectre and Meltdown.
  • malicious software that infects firmware, such as Mebromi and perhaps even Lojax.

Please keep in mind this is strictly off the top of my head.  I was thinking more about types of attacks that might be blocked a completely working set of TPM + SecureBoot + modern processors with fully-patched microcode.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

When it comes to the topic of TPM and Windows everyone talks about bitlocker, but I'm pretty sure that's not the only thing Windows uses/needs TPM for.   Maybe someone should make a detailed list, if MS doesn't have one already.  

1 hour ago, George P said:

When it comes to the topic of TPM and Windows everyone talks about bitlocker, but I'm pretty sure that's not the only thing Windows uses/needs TPM for.   Maybe someone should make a detailed list, if MS doesn't have one already.  

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/information-protection/tpm/trusted-platform-module-overview#practical-applications

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have updated my Series 9 Watch so I assume there is either a mistake in what was said, or as suggested - the new AI feature set isn’t supported on anything other than those listed above.
    • WhatsApp slams Isreali firm, NSO Group, for trying to spy on its users by David Uzondu WhatsApp has come out accusing Israeli cyber-intelligence firm, NSO Group, of deploying a fresh wave of highly targeted "spear phishing" attacks against users, which its security teams successfully thwarted. The Israeli firm, according to WhatsApp, ran this operation like its usual one-click phishing campaigns, trying to get people to click malicious links that lead them to external sites. To coordinate the campaign, the spyware vendor created fake test accounts and groups on the messaging app. WhatsApp said it is sharing the specific malicious domains, ikhwancast[.]com, ghazacast[.]com, and fr24cast[.]com, because potential victims need this data to check if they were targeted across other messaging systems or email platforms. The NSO Group is infamous for creating and selling Pegasus, a military-grade commercial spyware capable of silently compromising smartphones simply by sending a message or placing a missed call via apps like WhatsApp or iMessage. Users do not even have to interact with the incoming notification before the infection takes hold. Once Pegasus manages to break in, the spyware harvests private data, letting operators read private messages, emails, photos, and documents. It also tracks precise GPS locations, records keystrokes, activates the device's camera, and monitors live microphone audio. Independent investigations by cybersecurity watchdogs like The Citizen Lab and human rights organizations like Amnesty International have proven that governments use this software to track humanitarian workers, journalists, diplomats, and political dissidents. These findings directly contradict NSO Group claims that clients use the technology to spy on criminals and terrorists only. In late 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce added the firm to its Entity List, effectively banning the vendor from buying hardware and software from American tech companies. WhatsApp said in its blog post that the spyware vendor violated a permanent court injunction with this new spear-phishing campaign. This injunction, which took effect in 2025, strictly prohibited NSO Group from targeting WhatsApp and its users. The platform is now asking a federal court to hold the firm in contempt.
    • It would be surprising if even 3 year old Apple Watches (and not SE models at that) cannot run watchOS 27. Granted, it doesn't mean it would work as well. We'll see.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!