Difference in performance on USB-C from an USB-hub; connection via adapter USB3.1-to-USB-C or direct connection


Recommended Posts

I'm having an Anker 4-port USB 3.0 Ultra Slim Data Hub (USB 3.1) (causing interference with my mouse).

 

I can connect the USB-hub to an adapter USB3.1 to USB-C (see pic with the 'B') and plug it in my computer, and have the USB-dongle for my mouse be in the generic USB 3.1 port.

 

My question performance wise (and maybe even also 'power wise'): is it better to have a "native" USB-C type usb-hub? Or can I also use an adapter from USB-C to USB 3.1 and have the same performance?

I would like to have this USB-hub powerless/no power supply.

 

In case of a direct connection a new USB-hub has to be bought by me (like e.g. this Satechi as attached)

USBC.jpg

USBC1.jpg

The difference is negligible as long as the adapter is the same speed/usb version as what is plugging into it. 
 

 

  On 30/07/2021 at 14:52, adrynalyne said:

The difference is negligible as long as the adapter is the same speed/usb version as what is plugging into it. 
 

 

Expand  

OK. So USB3.1 device/hub into this adapter still brings it (down) to USB3.1. I get that ;)

So, technically it's better to have a 100% USB-C usb-hub, like e.g. the Satechi I posted here).

The devices connected to, determine the actual speed/throughput. But USB-C has a higher bandwidth, so technically my connected HDD and running device (when connected) can operate on full speed.... 

USB-C doesn’t have a higher bandwidth if it’s backed by the same tech as the USB-A ports. It’s just a different connector at that point. 

  On 30/07/2021 at 14:58, adrynalyne said:

USB-C doesn’t have a higher bandwidth if it’s backed by the same tech as the USB-A ports. It’s just a different connector at that point. 

Expand  

I see that "A USB-C port equipped with Thunderbolt 3 can push data speeds to a theoretical limit of 40Gbps. To show how far we've come, that's four times faster than USB 3.1"

 

So, maybe even when connecting USB3.1 (10Gbps) the 'internals' of the USB-hub are I guess "more equipped" to handle these speeds.

("simplified": 4 USB 3.1 devices of 10Gbps = 40 Gbps; instead of a USB3.1 USB-hub which gives more or less 2.5 Gbps (maybe maxed out to 5Gbps) if not all are on full load per port (10Gbps/4 ports is this 2.5Gbps)

 

Or does this kinda tech in usb-hubs work differently?

  On 30/07/2021 at 15:17, kiddingguy said:

I see that "A USB-C port equipped with Thunderbolt 3 can push data speeds to a theoretical limit of 40Gbps. To show how far we've come, that's four times faster than USB 3.1"

 

So, maybe even when connecting USB3.1 (10Gbps) the 'internals' of the USB-hub are I guess "more equipped" to handle these speeds.

("simplified": 4 USB 3.1 devices of 10Gbps = 40 Gbps; instead of a USB3.1 USB-hub which gives more or less 2.5 Gbps (maybe maxed out to 5Gbps) if not all are on full load per port (10Gbps/4 ports is this 2.5Gbps)

 

Or does this kinda tech in usb-hubs work differently?

Expand  

Nah.

 

The controller is what matters here. If all of your controllers are USB 3.1, you get the same bandwidth regardless of connector type. If your USB-C is Thunderbolt, then thats different.

  On 30/07/2021 at 15:34, adrynalyne said:

Nah.

 

The controller is what matters here. If all of your controllers are USB 3.1, you get the same bandwidth regardless of connector type. If your USB-C is Thunderbolt, then thats different.

Expand  

The specs on Satechi's site lists: "CONNECTOR TYPE Type-C, Thunderbolt 3 Compatible"
Than the question... is my notebook Thunderbolt 3 Compatible?! Have to look that one up ;)

  On 30/07/2021 at 15:40, kiddingguy said:

The specs on Satechi's site lists: "CONNECTOR TYPE Type-C, Thunderbolt 3 Compatible"
Than the question... is my notebook Thunderbolt 3 Compatible?! Have to look that one up ;)

Expand  

Not from what I saw.

  On 30/07/2021 at 15:42, adrynalyne said:

Not from what I saw.

Expand  

You're right on that one. The manual states: USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C, transfer rate up to 10 Gbps.

So... I can just use this adapter than?! And safe myself almost a 100 bucks.

  On 30/07/2021 at 15:46, kiddingguy said:

You're right on that one. The manual states: USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C, transfer rate up to 10 Gbps.

So... I can just use this adapter than?! And safe me almost a 100 bucks.

Expand  

You can; but if you run out of power for the devices or see malfunctions due to lower power, you will know why.

  On 30/07/2021 at 15:47, adrynalyne said:

You can; but if you run out of power for the devices or see malfunctions due to lower power, you will know why.

Expand  

Yeah I know (mouse issues). But this one is not on the same USB-ports input on my mobo.

So, (hopefully) the internal power relay to these USB ports (type A & type C) are different... and therefore causing -probably- less issues.

Regarding your mouse interference ... nothing to do with the power on the A or C ports. 5 and 10 Gbps USB speeds  generate a lot of RF energy in the 2.4GHz spectrum. Poor shielding on devices or having these 5/10Gbps devices operating very close to a 2.4GHz receiver will cause issues. Physically separate them.

 

https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/usb3-frequency-interference-papers.pdf

  On 30/07/2021 at 16:01, jasondefaoite said:
Expand  

Thx.

So, my assumption could be correct as the 2.4Ghz dongle is place next to the USB-port of the USB-hub, and hence the interference.

And... using a completely different (USB-C) port on another side of the notebook making the distance larger and, therefore, causing less interference due to the distance between the plugged in 2.4Ghz receiver and the via USB-connected usb-hub.

 

Image taken from page 9 of this white paper. 

USBC2.jpg

  • Like 1

When I had my Logitech unifier wireless dongle, it never worked correctly in the back port, so what I did is I got a 6ft USB extension cable, plugged it in the same port and then ran the wire and taped it to the back of my screen, mouse and keyboard worked great after that.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

I looked up an overview of this Asus GL731V notebook, and came across this video.

The image a still from it.

 

Looks like the connectors are wired to a different part of/on the motherboard, so with the usb-hub plugged into the USB-C port (above in picture), and the mouse-dongle in the 'regular' USB (part of the port-of-3) (right-side op picture)  I think I'm better off...

ASUS-GL731.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think that the last game I bought on day-one was something like Ghost of Tsushima. I've come to realise that I don't have enough time (or sometimes inclination) to game as much as I used to, and I've got plenty of games to keep me occupied if I do decide to play. So I don't see the need to buy a game when it first releases - I wait until it goes on sale. If I'm really excited about a game and the price is under £50 then I would consider it, but anything over that price point gets ignored until the price comes down.
    • For the foreseeable that is your choice. I'm interested tom try one, my wife was very pleased because one she is anti-social and driver chat annoys her and two more seriously there is a long history of drivers abusing women, it's rare, but it happens and more than it should. Sometimes she needs to get a late taxi and she says it may make her feel safer.
    • 5800x3d was chopped because it was too good, why bother releasing a new mid range.
    • Was it bad, sure, but I got it on PC so it was nowhere near as bad as the PS4/XBO versions. Besides, I spent around 200hrs in there and have yet to play the expansion for it. All in all I think I got my monies worth. Maybe I was lucky and didn't run into anything game breaking like others. Either way, $60 is my limit for a game, the point is I'm not going over that no matter what the title is or how much I want to play it. Thank god I don't suffer from FOMO.
    • spwave 0.9.0-1 by Razvan Serea spwave is a cross-platform audio editor designed for research and advanced analysis. It supports a wide range of audio formats, including WAV, AIFF, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, ALAC, raw PCM, and more via plug-ins. spwave offers precise editing tools such as zoom, crop, fade in/out, gain adjustment, and region extraction. It enables detailed spectral and phase analysis and supports unlimited undo/redo. Users can drag and drop files, edit metadata, save labeled regions, and view multiple synchronized waveforms. Internally, spwave processes audio in 64-bit precision, ensuring high accuracy. It runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a reliable and flexible tool for audio research and editing. spwave has following features: Support for multiple platforms: Windows, macOS, Linux (Motif, gtk), etc. Support for WAV, AIFF, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, ALAC, raw, and text files by using plug-ins. Support for many bits/samples: 8bits, 16bits, 24bits, 32bits, 32bits float, 64bits double. Converting the sampling frequency and the bits/sample of a file. Playing, zooming, cropping, deleting, extracting, etc. of a selected region. Fade-in, fade-out, gain adjustment, channel swapping, etc of a selected region. Editing file information that supports comments of WAV and AIFF, and ID3 tag of MP3. Analysis of a selected region using several analysis types, e.g. spectrum, smoothed spectrum, phase, unwrapped phase and group delay. Undoing and redoing without limitation of the number of times. Waveform extraction by drag & drop. Opening files by drag & drop. Autosaving of selected regions (you can do this by drag & drop also). Saving positions and regions as labels. Viewing some waveforms and setting regions synchronously. Almost all processing is 64 bits processing internally. Supported Formats: Read/Write: WAV, AIFF, AIFC, CAF, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, ALAC (.caf, .mp4), WMA (Windows), APE, AU/SND, PARIS, NIST, IRCAM, raw PCM, text. Read-only: MPEG-2 Layer 3 MP3, RMP files with VBR support. With 64-bit internal processing, autosave capabilities, and synchronized multi-view waveform editing, spwave is a solid tool for anyone handling complex audio editing or acoustic research. spwave 0.9.0-1 changelog: Implemented CQT spectrum and CQT spectrogram (beta version). Implemented piano-key display for spectrum/spectrogram view. Implemented indication of musical note name in cursor information for spectrum/spectrogram view. Fixed a bug that spectrogram view after zoom-in with large factor sometimes freezes. Fixed a bug that scroll and zoom-out in spectrogram view after zoom-in with large factor do not work correctly. Fixed a bug that spectrogram view provides sometimes wrong time information. Fixed a bug that plugin errors sometimes cause a crash. Fixed a bug that the color of grid lines is wrong in printing. Optimized layout of spectrogram view for printing. Enhanced the function of waveform cropping from label information. Fixed a bug that some items in the preference dialog related to labels do not work. Added some items related to the region label in the preference dialog. Fixed a bug that drawing selected region in the log-frequency axis does not work correctly. Added partial support for the dark mode of Windows (the menu bar and the menus). Fixed a bug that the cursor to indicate current calculation position of spectrogram is sometimes not shown. Changed drawing of cursor information into that with white background so as to make the information legible. Fixed a bug that moving to the head by scrolling the overview display sometimes fails. Added feature of alignment of the view region between spectrum view and spectrogram view. Download: spwave 64-bit | spwave 32-bit | ~3.0 MB (Freeware) Download: spwave ARM64 | 2.9 MB Links: spwave Home page | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      bukro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Wulle earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Wulle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Simmo3D earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      595
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      181
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      148
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      111
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!