American English vs British English


Recommended Posts

This is something I have been wondering for sometime and I tried to ask on Reddit but the post was removed before even getting posted, so I am going to ask here and see if anyone has some insights on it.

 

In American English, we call our underwear underpants/panties but in British English, it is called pants and knickers. In American English pants are what the British refer to as Trousers. I know the list goes on much longer than this but those are the primary examples that I think of. I am wondering what is the reasoning for this, I know that English (language) is a mix of Latin, and many other languages, but is that the reason for the same word to have completely different meanings or is it more like slang?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1410677-american-english-vs-british-english/
Share on other sites

"innernet" instead of internet.

 

Lots of UK place names end up seeingly getting overponounced by Americans (or totally wrong) Derbyshire (Pronounced darby-sh) turns into (der-be-shiyar) Nottinghamshire (pronounced nottingham-sh) turns into noddinghayam-shiyar.

 

Also, not just pants for underwear, I tend to say boxers (or wait for it..... underwear), seeing as I wear boxers, not pants which is something I'd usually expect children to wear lol.

 

So, as you can imagine, trousers reffered to as pants is a little bit cringe with that context.

 

There's also using brand names to describe an action, we have certainly caught up with that though "hoover" being a vacuum cleaner.

 

I don't think anyone refers to a photocopy as a Xerox here but we definitely do Google for things.

 

This is quite relevant -

 

I wouldn't know, English not being my mother tongue and all, but we have that in Spanish as well, things having (sometimes radically) different meanings on the other side of the Atlantic; I'd say they gained those other meanings over time after repeated usage, maybe began as slang. A good place to pose the question however could be the Stack Exchange for English, perhaps you get some good answers there too ;)

 

Your question reminded me of a book on crazy Spanish idioms and their origins, Con dos huevos from Héloïse Guerrier and David Sánchez. It's written in Spanish, English and French (all in the same book) and it names the idiom (with a direct translation to the other two languages), explains what it means and has an illustration accompanying it.

 

Here, two examples in case you find them funny or interesting:


 

Spoiler

condoshuevos1.thumb.jpg.349478b5976c17965fb9aaffc733a6b0.jpg

 

condoshuevos2.thumb.jpg.33541b5006ca4d2614684eb75904f125.jpg

 

On 23/08/2021 at 21:21, InsaneNutter said:

Here is an interesting one for you, what do you call this in America?

 

One thing is for sure, we can't agree on this in the UK! 😅

 

teacake.thumb.png.d04e34003cdcef0064fe04215c006834.png

I'm still convinced that a lot of these are either made up or haven't been used for 100 years or something!

On 23/08/2021 at 21:21, InsaneNutter said:

Here is an interesting one for you, what do you call this in America?

 

One thing is for sure, we can't agree on this in the UK! 😅

 

image snip

Ah man cob! I'm from the East Midlands and when I said cob to my wife from the South she didn't have a clue what I was talking about. I've now lived in the South long enough to start calling it roll. 😂

Back when I was in Uni we ended up having a debate on the correct name for a "Teacake".

 

I called it a Teacake, then got some funny looks. My friend from Nottingham called it a Cob and another friend from Surrey called it a Bap! It then turns out someone else also called it a Barm, just to confuse matters even more 😂

On 24/08/2021 at 04:42, SnoopZ said:

Basically America took our English and ######ed it up, and they talk funny. 🤐

Not really. We used too! It’s still English it’s just non-Rhotic. It kept changing over the years/decades.

There's no such thing as "British" English. There's English and there's American English.  Just tagging "American" in front tells you it's not the same thing. 

 

As for spelling... Well, America decided to go their own way before many spellings for formalised, so they stuck with the "make it up as you go" method. ;)

 

Honestly though, the differences don't really bother me.  What DOES is that though most Brits know the American differences and spellings just fine, the same cannot be said for many Americans!

  • Like 1
On 26/08/2021 at 07:50, FloatingFatMan said:

Honestly though, the differences don't really bother me.  What DOES is that though most Brits know the American differences and spellings just fine, the same cannot be said for many Americans!

I think that depends. Here in Switzerland for example, you have quite a lot of Americans that have moved over. These Americans know the differences without an issue because they have travelled outside of their own continent.

 

Also, think about the amount of American film and tv that gets distributed around the world. The amount of British film and tv distributed is miniscule. Which is a shame, there are some great shows that people end up missing out on - and I don't mean Eastenders, Coronation Street, Hollyoaks and all that rubbish.

  • Thanks 1
On 26/08/2021 at 07:11, Nick H. said:

I think that depends. Here in Switzerland for example, you have quite a lot of Americans that have moved over. These Americans know the differences without an issue because they have travelled outside of their own continent.

 

Also, think about the amount of American film and tv that gets distributed around the world. The amount of British film and tv distributed is miniscule. Which is a shame, there are some great shows that people end up missing out on - and I don't mean Eastenders, Coronation Street, Hollyoaks and all that rubbish.

Movies yes, but there are quite a lot of British shows available in the US...

On 23/08/2021 at 15:21, InsaneNutter said:

Here is an interesting one for you, what do you call this in America?

 

One thing is for sure, we can't agree on this in the UK! 😅

 

teacake.thumb.png.d04e34003cdcef0064fe04215c006834.png

Those are buns...as illustrated.  The North is correct.  :)

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
On 26/08/2021 at 01:50, FloatingFatMan said:

There's no such thing as "British" English. There's English and there's American English.  Just tagging "American" in front tells you it's not the same thing. 

 

As for spelling... Well, America decided to go their own way before many spellings for formalised, so they stuck with the "make it up as you go" method. ;)

 

Honestly though, the differences don't really bother me.  What DOES is that though most Brits know the American differences and spellings just fine, the same cannot be said for many Americans!

So the correct term would be American English (what I speak and spell with) vs "English" which one might argue is the more proper way of speaking/spelling? Is that a fair assessment? Does anyone know when 'American' English took off and became it's own (i.e. dropping the U's)?

On 26/08/2021 at 07:53, jnelsoninjax said:

So the correct term would be American English (what I speak and spell with) vs "English" which one might argue is the more proper way of speaking/spelling? Is that a fair assessment? Does anyone know when 'American' English took off and became it's own (i.e. dropping the U's)?

You can thank Noah Webster...

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Noah-Webster-American-lexicographer

 

Some of his suggestions didn't stick though...like "tung" vs. "tongue" ... thankfully 

https://www.bbcamerica.com/anglophenia/2014/05/america-drop-u-british-spellings

  • Thanks 1
On 26/08/2021 at 08:45, Jim K said:

Those are buns...as illustrated.  The North is correct.  :)

I would also accept roll (but I did live in UK for a while - maybe I picked it up there)

 

Muffin is VERY different and the rest of those name make no sense to me...

On 26/08/2021 at 13:53, jnelsoninjax said:

So the correct term would be American English (what I speak and spell with) vs "English" which one might argue is the more proper way of speaking/spelling? Is that a fair assessment? Does anyone know when 'American' English took off and became it's own (i.e. dropping the U's)?

Friendly jibes about illiterate yanks aside... ;)  I would argue that both are proper English, for each nation individually.  You have your way and we have ours, as it should be.  As long as we can understand each other, and unite against the insipient cretinism that is "leet speak", all is good!

On 26/08/2021 at 14:08, E.Worm Jimmy said:

I would also accept roll (but I did live in UK for a while - maybe I picked it up there)

 

Muffin is VERY different and the rest of those name make no sense to me...

Originally I'm from the Midlands (Nottinghamshire to be exact), and where I grew up, a "cob" is a crusty top roll, and a roll is a soft bread roll...

On 26/08/2021 at 09:09, FloatingFatMan said:

Friendly jibes about illiterate yanks aside... ;)  I would argue that both are proper English, for each nation individually.  You have your way and we have ours, as it should be.  As long as we can understand each other, and unite against the insipient cretinism that is "leet speak", all is good!

Originally I'm from the Midlands (Nottinghamshire to be exact), and where I grew up, a "cob" is a crusty top roll, and a roll is a soft bread roll...

Leet speak - does it even exists?

 

As someone who originally jumped from BBS'es to first AOL dial up CDs with free codes and then started using IRC - l33t speak was all the rage back then...

 

But as far as I can see - it is almost gone now- almost extinct.

I'm from Wigan originally, but have lived in the US for 17 years so far. My kids and wife still complain at me for pronouncing vitamin, garage and yogurt correctly (its the hill I will die on). I do enjoy switching pronunciations of schedule sometimes in the same conversation most people tend not to notice.

  • Like 1
On 24/08/2021 at 08:32, InsaneNutter said:

Back when I was in Uni we ended up having a debate on the correct name for a "Teacake".

 

I called it a Teacake, then got some funny looks. My friend from Nottingham called it a Cob and another friend from Surrey called it a Bap! It then turns out someone else also called it a Barm, just to confuse matters even more 😂

I can accept cob, bap (if I'm feeling cheeky) or roll, but teacake?! GTFO

On 26/08/2021 at 14:41, BritBronco said:

I'm from Wigan originally, but have lived in the US for 17 years so far. My kids and wife still complain at me for pronouncing vitamin, garage and yogurt correctly (its the hill I will die on). I do enjoy switching pronunciations of schedule sometimes in the same conversation most people tend not to notice.

"thigh dah min" "gah raj" "yo gert"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!