Kurtzman: Expect an expansion on the Star Trek Universe soon


Recommended Posts

Me:

 

I think we can definitely expect a Section 31 show, I can also see some sort of new Borg origins being a possibility (and I mean the new more compact Borg from the Picard show). I wish they would move on from that species. It has served for a number of Star Trek movies and whole season arcs in multiple Trek TV shows as well. How many times has humanity defeated the Borg when millions of other civilizations couldn't?

 

Anyway I hope they don't screw up Trek again like they did with Enterprise.

On 03/05/2022 at 11:51, Steven P. said:

I think we can definitely expect a Section 31 show, I can also see some sort of new Borg origins being a possibility (and I mean the new more compact Borg from the Picard show). I wish they would move on from that species. It has served for a number of Star Trek movies and whole season arcs in multiple Trek TV shows as well. How many times has humanity defeated the Borg when millions of other civilizations couldn't?

 

Anyway I hope they don't screw up Trek again like they did with Enterprise.

Section 31 was still in the plans, and I suspect that they are going to do a Starfleet Academy show with Tilly.

 

I think they closed the book [finally] with the Borg with last weeks episode of Picard and I don't think they were even referenced in the last season of Discovery with who created the DMA.

Rios/Stargazer doing a proper 25th century show would be great, but it would compete with strange new worlds. Interested to see what they come up with. 

On 03/05/2022 at 11:57, primortal said:

Section 31 was still in the plans, and I suspect that they are going to do a Starfleet Academy show with Tilly.

 

I think they closed the book [finally] with the Borg with last weeks episode of Picard and I don't think they were even referenced in the last season of Discovery with who created the DMA.

They were brought up when they talked about 10c and a collective consciousness. 

On 03/05/2022 at 17:57, primortal said:

Section 31 was still in the plans, and I suspect that they are going to do a Starfleet Academy show with Tilly.

 

I think they closed the book [finally] with the Borg with last weeks episode of Picard and I don't think they were even referenced in the last season of Discovery with who created the DMA.

  1. I will not watch any show that has "Tilly" in it
  2. Did you miss how this was a whole new start for the Borg, and actually sets up what appeared in Episode 1 before the Stargazer blew up?

My point is that in the Trek Universe they have literally wiped the slate with the Borg so they can create a bunch of new stories with the new and improved Next Generation Borg 😛 

On 03/05/2022 at 12:09, shockz said:

Rios/Stargazer doing a proper 25th century show would be great, but it would compete with strange new worlds. Interested to see what they come up with. 

How would it compete with Strange New Worlds?  Completely two different stardates.  I'm also wondering if Rios will stay with Ramirez.

 

I'd like to see Raffi and Seven with the Fenris Rangers.

 

On 03/05/2022 at 12:09, shockz said:

They were brought up when they talked about 10c and a collective consciousness. 

Dam, missed that part....

 

On 03/05/2022 at 12:11, Steven P. said:

Did you miss how this was a whole new start for the Borg, and actually sets up what appeared in Episode 1 before the Stargazer blew up?

I didn't miss it and I have many questions around the new start for the Borg.  I don't know if Borg/Legion was something else altogether in the first episode.

On 03/05/2022 at 12:25, primortal said:

How would it compete with Strange New Worlds?  Completely two different stardates. 

They’d both be doing the same thing though. They’ve never had two series competing with the same type of mission. Deep space nine was a bridge to voyager and TNG, but was a very different show than either of them. Voyager was basically another TNG just lost in space and wasn’t airing during TNG, they even used the same sets with a fresh coat of paint. 

On 03/05/2022 at 12:28, shockz said:

They’d both be doing the same thing though. They’ve never had two series competing with the same type of mission. Deep space nine was a bridge to voyager and TNG, but was a very different show than either of them. Voyager was basically another TNG just lost in space and wasn’t airing during TNG. 

True.  But I'd suspect it would be more of a season story arc like Picar/Discovery and less episodic like Strange New Worlds unless the old format blows away ratings in comparison to Picard and Discovery.

On 03/05/2022 at 19:28, shockz said:

They’d both be doing the same thing though. They’ve never had two series competing with the same type of mission. Deep space nine was a bridge to voyager and TNG, but was a very different show than either of them. Voyager was basically another TNG just lost in space and wasn’t airing during TNG, they even used the same sets with a fresh coat of paint. 

It wouldn't really matter and be competition if they're not airing at the same time.   One show ends it's 10-13 eps or whatever and the next one starts, like with how Picard s2 ends and SNW starts.   I don't think the fans will have a problem with jumping back and forth on the timelines.

On 06/05/2022 at 22:25, McCordRm said:

Section 31 would be the darkest Star Trek series ever.

Would it have to?  Sure they've done some dark stuff but it could be more of your typical spy series stuff, just set in the Trek world and scifi.   At the end Section 31 is just their version of the CIA or MI6.

Yup he's dragging the Trek name through the mud with the shoddy and poorly written shows.

I'd watch Voyager 100x better than this, hell, I'd even try to struggle through Enterprise again...

 

These days trek reminds me more of Stargate/Recent Dr Who series for how much the fling around plots, make up new nonsense and have 'extreme' danger only to survive 5 minutes at the end because of 'one person'.

 

I don't care about the 'times it's written for' but the writing better be good and I'd be happy.  I don't see how the future can be more depressing than 'now' but it seems to manage it in this 'Kurtzman' Trek.  Glad we've given up money and in the pursuit of benefitting mankind as a whole, it really shines through in this universe :D

On 07/05/2022 at 23:21, imachip said:

Yup he's dragging the Trek name through the mud with the shoddy and poorly written shows.

I'd watch Voyager 100x better than this, hell, I'd even try to struggle through Enterprise again...

I've seen all seven seasons of Voyager at least 3 times and when I am not watching entire seasons, individual episodes I've rewatched more, some shows are just so good and rewatchable :) It is my favorite of all Trek. I've been meaning to give Enterprise another watch because I originally saw the series in SD on TV when it was airing, I've seen a few episodes in HD since but I've not done whole seasons back to back yet.

 

Another show that is rewatchable is Stargate Universe. I was so sad when that got cancelled, seen that all the way through three times as well.

 

The first episode of ST Strange New Worlds is definitely rewatchable!

On 07/05/2022 at 03:38, George P said:

Would it have to?  Sure they've done some dark stuff but it could be more of your typical spy series stuff, just set in the Trek world and scifi.   At the end Section 31 is just their version of the CIA or MI6.

I would think it would have to be. Section 31 does a lot of shady ######.

On 07/05/2022 at 18:20, Steven P. said:

The first episode of ST Strange New Worlds is definitely rewatchable!

I haven't watched it yet. I do like the actors (Mount, Peck and Romijn) and their chemistry together. I can see why they built a show around them.

I always thought a Starfleet Academy show would get good traction, and indeed is what I was HOPING Picard would largely be... It struck me that, rather than being the Admiral in charge, or one of the teachers etc, he would be retired and fulfilling Boothby's old role...

  • Like 1

I suppose you could do a academy show that's 4 seasons, if people watch, which is as long as the program iirc.  So you'd track a group from start to finish.   But I could also see how it could go south into teen drama just as well.

On 08/05/2022 at 22:51, George P said:

I suppose you could do a academy show that's 4 seasons, if people watch, which is as long as the program iirc.  So you'd track a group from start to finish.   But I could also see how it could go south into teen drama just as well.

I think Star Fleet Academy would be more about lessons learned, the responsibilities of command and other duties. It's stuff we've already touched on with other characters across series like DS9 (Sisko's son, Nog) and TNG (several one-off characters, Wesley). I actually thought the episode in Discovery with the cadets was an interesting one, if not a little too over the top. I like the idea of seeing lots of personalities build a repertoire and become a team. Anyone who makes it about teen drama only would be largely missing the point of what that show should be about. And throwing someone like Picard, or even Riker in as an instructor would have just thrown it over the top, imo.

 

But Kurtzman Trek isn't about personal growth, building a better future, and life lessons. It's more about drama and a lack of hope. I still need to watch Strange New Worlds, so maybe that will be better.

On 07/05/2022 at 02:38, George P said:

Would it have to?  Sure they've done some dark stuff but it could be more of your typical spy series stuff, just set in the Trek world and scifi.   At the end Section 31 is just their version of the CIA or MI6.

Have you paid attention to the kind of shady ###### the CIA and MI6 pull? Yea, it would definitely be dark as hell.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Please no, I beg of you, Exclusive: Star Trek Kelvin Timeline Show In Development

 

I'd rather have a mirror universe series than this.

On 24/08/2022 at 22:16, primortal said:

Please no, I beg of you, Exclusive: Star Trek Kelvin Timeline Show In Development

 

I'd rather have a mirror universe series than this.

If they want to keep the movie side of the universe going I see the thinking behind it.  And work on the 4th movie is going ahead so..   Guess we'll see how it goes?

  • Like 2
On 24/08/2022 at 21:16, primortal said:

Please no, I beg of you, Exclusive: Star Trek Kelvin Timeline Show In Development

 

I'd rather have a mirror universe series than this.

I wouldn't be against a series centered around the events after the return of Voyager.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!