She-Hulk: Attorney at Law (Disney+)


Recommended Posts

Was a little hesitant about this after the first teaser or two...but this trailer looks pretty good.  Enjoyed the banter between the cousins. 

 

Stay for the end of the trailer...Marvel also announced a Daredevil series will be coming in 2024 with Charlie Cox and Vincent D'Onofrio.

 

 

 

Quote

"She-Hulk," a new comedy series coming to Disney+, stars Tatiana Maslany as She-Hulk/Jennifer Walters, a lawyer who specializes in superhuman-oriented legal cases. "She-Hulk" will welcome a host of Marvel characters to the series, including the Hulk, played by Mark Ruffalo, and the Abomination, played by Tim Roth. The series is directed by Kat Coiro and Anu Valia; Jessica Gao is head writer.

August 17

 

Though I didn't create a topic for it ... Ms. Marvel on Disney+ was pretty good.  Recommended.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1419996-she-hulk-attorney-at-law-disney/
Share on other sites

On 24/07/2022 at 16:38, Zathras5 said:

Not sure, looks kind of silly.

 

I wasn't going to bother with Ms. Marvel but ended up watching and quite enjoyed it. Maybe this will be the same for me.

Well, it IS intended to be a comedy... That tends to give shows a bit more leeway...

We'll see.

I'm already put off by the "look how naturally better I am because I'm a woman" crap. He had to go through

years of literal hell trying to be The Hulk, and the trailer shows her just taking to it like a fish to water.

Once again... "The Message". Meh.

On 27/07/2022 at 00:03, McCordRm said:

We'll see.

I'm already put off by the "look how naturally better I am because I'm a woman" crap. He had to go through

years of literal hell trying to be The Hulk, and the trailer shows her just taking to it like a fish to water.

Once again... "The Message". Meh.

Um.. Have you ever read the She-Hulk comics, by any chance?

  • 1 month later...

images.jpg

 

Tried to like it, but after the third episode, I'm out.

 

she-hulk-twerk-she-hulk-megan-thee-stallion.gif

 

On Facebook there was some heated discussion about the above scene, and a lot of feminist's getting triggered over people saying they can't get into the show, and scenes like that make it cringe. It has a 5.1 rating on IMDB after 75K votes. Marvel and Hollyweird just keeps sinking further and further with the crap and side-sh*t-shows they are milking from the franchise, of course I am hardy an authority on all things Marvel, and I fully expect someone to put me in place, because I don't understand sh*t (or something)!

 

I've decided to start watching Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law (8.0 rating on IMDB after 12K votes).

 

004c302f-c548-4ff4-bc1d-2f1ae557de63_text.gif

 

It's great!

 

If you like She-Hulk: Attorney at Law, good luck to you :) 

  • Like 2
On 06/09/2022 at 13:06, Steven P. said:

 

she-hulk-twerk-she-hulk-megan-thee-stallion.gif

 

On Facebook there was some heated discussion about the above scene,

One can debate if the show is good or not but who the hell cares what anyone is saying on Facebook?  We all know there is someone, somewhere triggered about everything.

 

 

On 06/09/2022 at 15:01, SidVicious said:

That twerking scene was so bad I just stopped the episode and moved on to Daredevil S2.

I am questioning you actually watched the show and just read about the twerking on Facebook. It was like a 30 second extra scene during the closing credits so you watched the whole episode.

 

IMO The show is OK and I find it entertaining for what it is which is a light hearted, comedic mini-series based on a more "minor" Marvel character that wasn't always taken seriously even for a superhero comic. We certainly don't need 12 one hour episodes for She-Hulk.

  • Like 3
On 06/09/2022 at 16:49, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

I am questioning you actually watched the show and just read about the twerking on Facebook. It was like a 30 second extra scene during the closing credits so you watched the whole episode.

 

IMO The show is OK and I find it entertaining for what it is which is a light hearted, comedic mini-series based on a more "minor" Marvel character that wasn't always taken seriously even for a superhero comic. We certainly don't need 12 one hour episodes for She-Hulk.

Calm your tits, bot.

I watched the whole episode and that twerking scene was unnecessary and pointless.

On 06/09/2022 at 15:56, SidVicious said:

Calm your tits, bot.

I watched the whole episode and that twerking scene was unnecessary and pointless.

It was just a silly post credit scene for laughs... like the avengers Shawarma scene.

 

I'm just taking the show as a straight up comedy, It's not that bad personally...

Spoiler

Although I'm really only watching for the Daredevil cameo.

.

On 07/09/2022 at 12:13, Zathras5 said:

I'm just taking the show as a straight up comedy, It's not that bad personally...

Yeah, I'm enjoying the show as well. Some parts genuinely made me laugh out loud. I feel sorry for the people saying things like "Disney has destroyed marvel." I mean get a life, it's just a stupid TV show lol.

  • Like 2
On 06/09/2022 at 15:01, SidVicious said:

That twerking scene was so bad I just stopped the episode and moved on to Daredevil S2.

So... let me get this straight... you stopped the last episode available... after the credits? Sounds like you are just parroting what others are saying, and doing a bad job at it lol

On 06/09/2022 at 12:01, SidVicious said:

That twerking scene was so bad I just stopped the episode and moved on to Daredevil S2.

Man, I hear ya.  I got as far as this scene, and I just LOST IT:

 

image.thumb.png.d6401e9676823984d32b938a5ad6a1dd.png

 

I STOPPED IMMEDIATELY, walked out of the theater, complained to the management, demanded a refund, and posted a horrible review on Yelp.

  • Haha 2
On 26/07/2022 at 19:03, McCordRm said:

We'll see.

I'm already put off by the "look how naturally better I am because I'm a woman" crap. He had to go through

years of literal hell trying to be The Hulk, and the trailer shows her just taking to it like a fish to water.

Once again... "The Message". Meh.

I took a look at your YouTube show in your signature... and wow! Amazing acting! I really thought I was looking at 3 mentally disabled humans. Very convincing.

On 07/09/2022 at 18:24, mram said:

Man, I hear ya.  I got as far as this scene, and I just LOST IT:

 

image.thumb.png.d6401e9676823984d32b938a5ad6a1dd.png

 

I STOPPED IMMEDIATELY, walked out of the theater, complained to the management, demanded a refund, and posted a horrible review on Yelp.

BAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!  Well played!

.... Aaaaaaaaanyway.. Back to the show.  Honestly, this isn't even a particularly good comedy.  I hate that they've turned Wong into a comic sidekick, the CGI was pretty sub-par for what they're capable of, the story was weak as f and don't get me started on her "date"...

 

I think I'm done with this trash.

Not done with it...they are short episodes so whatever.  The last episode, the Wong one, was just so...ugh.  I was asking myself why any of that would actually happen (Wong filing suit...just stupid). 

 

Anyway, the story writing in this series has been pretty bad IMO ... the She-Hulk CGI isn't very good (why does she have to be bad-CGI-She-Hulk while in the office/court/etc.)  The whole dating thing was dumb to.

 

Anyway...on to the next episode.  

Frankly, I’m enjoying the series.  Never followed the comics on her, so I can’t compare it to anything.  The CGI is off at times and they could have gotten a real person for some of the far shots of her standing and walking scenes where you can’t see her face.

 

The last episode was a head scratcher, just take the Sling Ring back and be done with it.

Absolute trash - Disney is ruining things as usual and milking the demographic.

Stopped watching after 10mins...

Watched new Thor and was again put off by the obvious same sex desires shown by two actors.

Why?? Does not need it added at any point or any reference to such.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
    • Does anyone remember the time when VSCode was a lightweight solution, just shy of 40 MB? No?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      404
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!