She-Hulk: Attorney at Law (Disney+)


Recommended Posts

On 11/09/2022 at 19:24, sava700 said:

Absolute trash - Disney is ruining things as usual and milking the demographic.

Stopped watching after 10mins...

Watched new Thor and was again put off by the obvious same sex desires shown by two actors.

Why?? Does not need it added at any point or any reference to such.

Lol, you pour little sensitive snowflake.

On 13/09/2022 at 16:36, FloatingFatMan said:

So, someone who doesn't like something that you like, is a snowflake?

 

That tells me much about you. :p

 

What? I'm not the homophobe. Did you even read what he wrote?

Edited by PmRd
On 13/09/2022 at 22:03, PmRd said:

What? I'm not the homophobe. Did you even read what he wrote?

Sure did, and I agree.  There's nothing "snowflake" about being annoyed by filmmakers injecting gratuitous same sex relationships into a plot that serves literally ZERO purpose other than to tick boxes.  The same applies to ANY other kind of relationships too.  If it serves no purpose to further the plot in some way, especially in an action movie, then it's nothing but box ticking.

On 14/09/2022 at 09:23, NinjaGinger said:

If a space alien came to earth and watch some telly, I'm sure he [not politically correct btw]  same-sex relationships were the most common thing on Earth.

It all really comes down to this.  If romantic scenes add something tangible to the story the movie is telling then fine, but otherwise?  And if it's called for, and especially when you're using existing fandoms, keep it appropriate to the story you're telling.  If you establish a character as LBGTQ+ from the very start and a romance fits the story then I don't care, but if DC have Lois Lane cuddling up with Supergirl, or Marvel have Peter Parker eloping with Flash Thompson... I'm gonna bleeping well lose my sh**! :p

 

  • 4 weeks later...
On 06/10/2022 at 16:51, Innervisions33 said:

It took a bit longer than it should have, but we finally have a hit episode. 👍

Yea, finally.  I guess one should watch episode 1, skip episodes 2-6 and pick it up again at 7.  Regarding episodes 2-6...they just seem like filler...not sure they've really contained anything worthwhile?

 

 

On 06/10/2022 at 21:46, Jim K said:

Yea, finally.  I guess one should watch episode 1, skip episodes 2-6 and pick it up again at 7.  Regarding episodes 2-6...they just seem like filler...not sure they've really contained anything worthwhile?

 

 

Yeah... bits and pieces of details that lead to what happens in 7 and I assume 8, but mostly filler.  Some filler here and there is fine, and I was good with it through episode 4 but it really dragged with 5 and 6.  

The one thing that She-Hulk taught me was that you don't have to like or watch all the MCU movies and series. 

 

Bringing in Daredevil was cool (One of my favorite marvel shows and Vincent D'Onofrio as kingpin is still one of my favorite villain's) but I just don't like the story. 

On 07/10/2022 at 14:30, spacelordmaster said:

I'm sorry but this series is a total flop. Stupid is not even enough to describe this garbage.

It's definitely their weakest show by far. A couple laughs and not much else.

  • Like 1

I'm sure the final episode will get mixed reviews because... the internet!... but I enjoyed it.  Still think the season was up and down but it finished in a way I did not expect and I found myself laughing more often than not during the "twist."  

I thought this show was fun and clearly didn't take itself serious. 

 

‘That’s what hulks do. We smash thing. Bruce smashes buildings. I smash fourth walls and bad endings. And sometimes Matt Murdoch.’

 

That's some funny ######. 

 

 

Also loved when she asked about the Xmen

On 14/10/2022 at 05:41, mudslag said:

I thought this show was fun and clearly didn't take itself serious. 

 

‘That’s what hulks do. We smash thing. Bruce smashes buildings. I smash fourth walls and bad endings. And sometimes Matt Murdoch.’

 

That's some funny ######. 

 

 

Also loved when she asked about the Xmen

yep, not a great series, but the last two episodes were enjoyable

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 7-Zip 26.02 by Razvan Serea 7-Zip is a open source file archiver with a high compression ratio. The program supports 7z, XZ, BZIP2, GZIP, TAR, ZIP, WIM, ARJ, CAB, CHM, CPIO, CramFS, DEB, DMG, FAT, HFS, ISO, LZH, LZMA, MBR, MSI, NSIS, NTFS, RAR, RPM, SquashFS, UDF, VHD, WIM, XAR, Z. Most of the source code is under the GNU LGPL license. The unRAR code is under a mixed license: GNU LGPL + unRAR restrictions. Check license information here: 7-Zip license. You can use 7-Zip on any computer, including a computer in a commercial organization. You don't need to register or pay for 7-Zip. The main features of 7-Zip are: High compression ratio in 7z format with LZMA compression Compression ratio for ZIP and GZIP formats: 2-10 % better than the ratio provided by PKZip and WinZip Strong AES-256 encryption in 7z and ZIP formats Self-extracting capability for 7z format Integration with Windows Shell Powerful File Manager Powerful command line version Plugin for FAR Manager Localizations for 74 languages 7-Zip 26.02 changelog: Some bugs and vulnerabilities were fixed. Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (64-bit) | 1.6 MB (Open Source) Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (32-bit) | 1.3 MB Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (ARM64) | 1.5 MB View: 7-Zip Website | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Blast from the past.
    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!