She-Hulk: Attorney at Law (Disney+)

By Jim K
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

+pmrd Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
On 11/09/2022 at 19:24, sava700 said:

Absolute trash - Disney is ruining things as usual and milking the demographic.

Stopped watching after 10mins...

Watched new Thor and was again put off by the obvious same sex desires shown by two actors.

Why?? Does not need it added at any point or any reference to such.

Lol, you pour little sensitive snowflake.

Grand Master

+pmrd Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted (edited)
On 13/09/2022 at 16:36, FloatingFatMan said:

So, someone who doesn't like something that you like, is a snowflake?

 

That tells me much about you. :p

 

What? I'm not the homophobe. Did you even read what he wrote?

Edited by PmRd
Grand Master

FloatingFatMan

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 13/09/2022 at 22:03, PmRd said:

What? I'm not the homophobe. Did you even read what he wrote?

Sure did, and I agree.  There's nothing "snowflake" about being annoyed by filmmakers injecting gratuitous same sex relationships into a plot that serves literally ZERO purpose other than to tick boxes.  The same applies to ANY other kind of relationships too.  If it serves no purpose to further the plot in some way, especially in an action movie, then it's nothing but box ticking.

Grand Master

FloatingFatMan

Posted
Posted
On 14/09/2022 at 09:23, NinjaGinger said:

If a space alien came to earth and watch some telly, I'm sure he [not politically correct btw]  same-sex relationships were the most common thing on Earth.

It all really comes down to this.  If romantic scenes add something tangible to the story the movie is telling then fine, but otherwise?  And if it's called for, and especially when you're using existing fandoms, keep it appropriate to the story you're telling.  If you establish a character as LBGTQ+ from the very start and a romance fits the story then I don't care, but if DC have Lois Lane cuddling up with Supergirl, or Marvel have Peter Parker eloping with Flash Thompson... I'm gonna bleeping well lose my sh**! :p

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Grand Master

Jim K Global Moderator

Posted
  • Author
  • Global Moderator
Posted
On 06/10/2022 at 16:51, Innervisions33 said:

It took a bit longer than it should have, but we finally have a hit episode. 👍

Yea, finally.  I guess one should watch episode 1, skip episodes 2-6 and pick it up again at 7.  Regarding episodes 2-6...they just seem like filler...not sure they've really contained anything worthwhile?

 

 

Proficient

Innervisions33

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 06/10/2022 at 21:46, Jim K said:

Yea, finally.  I guess one should watch episode 1, skip episodes 2-6 and pick it up again at 7.  Regarding episodes 2-6...they just seem like filler...not sure they've really contained anything worthwhile?

 

 

Yeah... bits and pieces of details that lead to what happens in 7 and I assume 8, but mostly filler.  Some filler here and there is fine, and I was good with it through episode 4 but it really dragged with 5 and 6.  

Grand Master

Xenon

Posted
Posted

The one thing that She-Hulk taught me was that you don't have to like or watch all the MCU movies and series. 

 

Bringing in Daredevil was cool (One of my favorite marvel shows and Vincent D'Onofrio as kingpin is still one of my favorite villain's) but I just don't like the story. 

Experienced

Zathras5

Posted
Posted
On 07/10/2022 at 14:30, spacelordmaster said:

I'm sorry but this series is a total flop. Stupid is not even enough to describe this garbage.

It's definitely their weakest show by far. A couple laughs and not much else.

  • spacelordmaster
  • Like 1
Proficient

Innervisions33

Posted
Posted

I'm sure the final episode will get mixed reviews because... the internet!... but I enjoyed it.  Still think the season was up and down but it finished in a way I did not expect and I found myself laughing more often than not during the "twist."  

Grand Master

mudslag

Posted
Posted (edited)

I thought this show was fun and clearly didn't take itself serious. 

 

‘That’s what hulks do. We smash thing. Bruce smashes buildings. I smash fourth walls and bad endings. And sometimes Matt Murdoch.’

 

That's some funny ######. 

 

 

Also loved when she asked about the Xmen

Grand Master

Som

Posted
Posted
On 14/10/2022 at 05:41, mudslag said:

I thought this show was fun and clearly didn't take itself serious. 

 

‘That’s what hulks do. We smash thing. Bruce smashes buildings. I smash fourth walls and bad endings. And sometimes Matt Murdoch.’

 

That's some funny ######. 

 

 

Also loved when she asked about the Xmen

yep, not a great series, but the last two episodes were enjoyable

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Secure Boot

      By +Edouard · Posted

      Hi all. I have a seven year old Acer laptop which according to Acer website can't receive the new MS updates. This device lives in my bedroom and is purely a consumption device. No gaming, no nothing. I have followed online instructions and turned off secure boot which now gives me a green tick in W11 Security. Now, I have MWB Premium now for several years and I'm reasonably careful with my online activity with this laptop. I'm also not a gamer in any way so I'm not asking much from this laptop. Given that, am I safe to continue using this device given I've turned off secure boot? That's it, that's my question.
    • Windows 11 is getting redesigned taskbar settings in new build

      By nekrosoft13 · Posted

      finally [Taskbar] Taskbar customization just got easier. As we continue to make improvements to the Taskbar experience mentioned last month, we've introduced a dedicated Taskbar Size setting, making it simpler to find, understand, and personalize your ideal taskbar experience.
    • Notion is shutting down its email client one year after launch

      By Chugworth · Posted

      Let me get this straight... It was a web interface for Gmail, so if privacy at Google wasn't concerning enough you'd be going through two companies. And their big feature was the very thing that would make people consider dumping Gmail.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Steven P. · Posted

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!