She-Hulk: Attorney at Law (Disney+)


Recommended Posts

On 11/09/2022 at 19:24, sava700 said:

Absolute trash - Disney is ruining things as usual and milking the demographic.

Stopped watching after 10mins...

Watched new Thor and was again put off by the obvious same sex desires shown by two actors.

Why?? Does not need it added at any point or any reference to such.

Lol, you pour little sensitive snowflake.

On 13/09/2022 at 16:36, FloatingFatMan said:

So, someone who doesn't like something that you like, is a snowflake?

 

That tells me much about you. :p

 

What? I'm not the homophobe. Did you even read what he wrote?

Edited by PmRd
On 13/09/2022 at 22:03, PmRd said:

What? I'm not the homophobe. Did you even read what he wrote?

Sure did, and I agree.  There's nothing "snowflake" about being annoyed by filmmakers injecting gratuitous same sex relationships into a plot that serves literally ZERO purpose other than to tick boxes.  The same applies to ANY other kind of relationships too.  If it serves no purpose to further the plot in some way, especially in an action movie, then it's nothing but box ticking.

On 14/09/2022 at 09:23, NinjaGinger said:

If a space alien came to earth and watch some telly, I'm sure he [not politically correct btw]  same-sex relationships were the most common thing on Earth.

It all really comes down to this.  If romantic scenes add something tangible to the story the movie is telling then fine, but otherwise?  And if it's called for, and especially when you're using existing fandoms, keep it appropriate to the story you're telling.  If you establish a character as LBGTQ+ from the very start and a romance fits the story then I don't care, but if DC have Lois Lane cuddling up with Supergirl, or Marvel have Peter Parker eloping with Flash Thompson... I'm gonna bleeping well lose my sh**! :p

 

  • 4 weeks later...
On 06/10/2022 at 16:51, Innervisions33 said:

It took a bit longer than it should have, but we finally have a hit episode. 👍

Yea, finally.  I guess one should watch episode 1, skip episodes 2-6 and pick it up again at 7.  Regarding episodes 2-6...they just seem like filler...not sure they've really contained anything worthwhile?

 

 

On 06/10/2022 at 21:46, Jim K said:

Yea, finally.  I guess one should watch episode 1, skip episodes 2-6 and pick it up again at 7.  Regarding episodes 2-6...they just seem like filler...not sure they've really contained anything worthwhile?

 

 

Yeah... bits and pieces of details that lead to what happens in 7 and I assume 8, but mostly filler.  Some filler here and there is fine, and I was good with it through episode 4 but it really dragged with 5 and 6.  

The one thing that She-Hulk taught me was that you don't have to like or watch all the MCU movies and series. 

 

Bringing in Daredevil was cool (One of my favorite marvel shows and Vincent D'Onofrio as kingpin is still one of my favorite villain's) but I just don't like the story. 

On 07/10/2022 at 14:30, spacelordmaster said:

I'm sorry but this series is a total flop. Stupid is not even enough to describe this garbage.

It's definitely their weakest show by far. A couple laughs and not much else.

  • Like 1

I'm sure the final episode will get mixed reviews because... the internet!... but I enjoyed it.  Still think the season was up and down but it finished in a way I did not expect and I found myself laughing more often than not during the "twist."  

I thought this show was fun and clearly didn't take itself serious. 

 

‘That’s what hulks do. We smash thing. Bruce smashes buildings. I smash fourth walls and bad endings. And sometimes Matt Murdoch.’

 

That's some funny ######. 

 

 

Also loved when she asked about the Xmen

On 14/10/2022 at 05:41, mudslag said:

I thought this show was fun and clearly didn't take itself serious. 

 

‘That’s what hulks do. We smash thing. Bruce smashes buildings. I smash fourth walls and bad endings. And sometimes Matt Murdoch.’

 

That's some funny ######. 

 

 

Also loved when she asked about the Xmen

yep, not a great series, but the last two episodes were enjoyable

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We had no idea as kids how much time and energy it took to be an adult 😅
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
    • When Windows 7 was released I created an AutoHotkey script that uses Alt+` as a keyboard shortcut to move a window across monitors. I have been using that script for over 15 years and this is the first time I have come across another app that uses the same shortcut!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!